AFL Round 15

[Brodlach]

Look above.

Everyone saw it. Crows had plenty of chances but Collingwood got a leg up all day from the umpiring.

Yep agree, as I said above too many missed opportunities


I’m as salty as ####

[Wedgie]

Absolutely the Crows were robbed.
Right in front of me.
Right in front of me!

[woodublieve12]

Look above.

Everyone saw it. Crows had plenty of chances but Collingwood got a leg up all day from the umpiring.

Yep agree, as I said above too many missed opportunities


I’m as salty as ####

Stevic has form at the g

[whufc]

I guess the umps were getting some payback for their display earlier in the year at AO between the two sides.

Collingwood were able to overcome poor umpiring earlier in the year. The Crows weren't yesterday.

[Brodlach]

Still salty

[Booney]

Still?

[tigerpie]

Still salty

You'll get over it eventually
Lots to like about your game style and you'll at least be around the mark in September.

[Brodlach]

Still?

Suggesting I’m always salty?

[Booney]

Still?

Suggesting I’m always salty?

Not at all. You're in the 24 hour window so it's ok.

John Cahill had that as a rule for his players, you get 24 hours to have the sads after a loss then you get back on with it. Good philosophy but hardly surprising that Cahill put something in place that works.

[FlyingHigh]

Stocker's tackle last night escapes any sanction from the MRO, absolutely disgusting that he gets nothing while Sicily gets 3.
I want to hear from the AFL over this one. So basically their crackdown comes down to luck, not the act, whether its deliberate or accidental doesnt matter. it only matters if they hit their head. If this is the case Rohan should be suspended as clearly its the result that matters not how it happens.

Yep, you should be ******* filthy.

[FlyingHigh]

Stand rule sucks

Yep. Another legacy from that shit stain Steven Hocking.

Think it also has to be considered in the debacle that is play-on. Sometimes only need to blink sideways and it gets called play on.

[woodublieve12]

Well done Collingwood

2016: +12 Western Bulldogs 20 — Sydney Swans 8

[am Bays]

2016: +12 Western Bulldogs 20 — Sydney Swans 8

[mots02]

Well done Collingwood

2016: +12 Western Bulldogs 20 — Sydney Swans 8

[Brodlach]

Still?

Suggesting I’m always salty?

Not at all. You're in the 24 hour window so it's ok.

John Cahill had that as a rule for his players, you get 24 hours to have the sads after a loss then you get back on with it. Good philosophy but hardly surprising that Cahill put something in place that works.

I’m in the 24 hour zone, Wubbzy is in the 24 years zone

[woodublieve12]

Still?

Suggesting I’m always salty?

Not at all. You're in the 24 hour window so it's ok.

John Cahill had that as a rule for his players, you get 24 hours to have the sads after a loss then you get back on with it. Good philosophy but hardly surprising that Cahill put something in place that works.

I’m in the 24 hour zone, Wubbzy is in the 24 years zone

if it cost you a flag there is no expiry date

[Armchair expert]

Stand rule sucks

Yep. Another legacy from that shit stain Steven Hocking.

Think it also has to be considered in the debacle that is play-on. Sometimes only need to blink sideways and it gets called play on.

Unless you are having a shot at goal then your "natural arc" can have you standing right next to the guy on mark, its a farce.

[carey]

Do people actually think that Umpire's go out and purposely try to cheat to favour a side?

[tigerpie]

Do people actually think that Umpire's go out and purposely try to cheat to favour a side?

Yep, they're out there and walking among us.
They can have a certain bias against certain players however.

[woodublieve12]

Do people actually think that Umpire's go out and purposely try to cheat to favour a side?

nope. but just like players. umpires have stinkers too