Poll on Advertiser website
Posted:
Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:19 amby RustyCage
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,20471994-21543,00.html
How about an option for "Beaten by a better team?"
Or are they too busy finding excuses and cant consider the fact that there may be a team better than their beloved Crows?
Posted:
Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:30 amby am Bays
Spot on PAFC better team won, we had the ability to win if all the players worked together for the full 120 min but ultimately West Coast's class shone through.
I think you'll find the club is doing that, let the crapertiser worry about the external factors....
Posted:
Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:50 amby Rik E Boy
LMAO. Nothing has changed in old Adelaide town it appears! What an embarrassment to objective Crows fans everywhere. Mind you, the Geelong Advertiser is hardly a beacon of objective comment when it comes to assessing Geelong's 'performances'.
regards,
REB
Posted:
Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:21 amby PortAdelaideProud
REB,
Your right, The Advertiser hasn't changed one single bit. Two straight years, the Crows have lost the pre-lim, and two straight years, the Advertiser reads 'We're so proud of you'.
When Port Adelaide lost two pre-lims finals in a row, the Advertiser read 'CHOKERS' both those years.
Now, if anyone says that The Advertiser isn't biased, they need to be smacked in the head.
Posted:
Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:48 pmby Ian
The Advertiser wrote:Vote Now!
What was the main reason for the Crows' loss to West Coast in the preliminary final?
Add your vote!
*Umpiring decisions
*Biglands injury
*Coaching error
*Players without match fitness
*Unavailable players
Should have been a couple more options, looks like they are the only answers that they want to make public
