**SPOILER** From PhilG
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:32 pm..
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:32 pmPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:35 pmboring...bad luck Scott West
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:39 pmThought you would have learnt ....
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:45 pmCongrats to Goodes
Obviously Goodes had no team mates pinching votes of him, unfortunately for Judd, he has Cousins, Kerr and Cox to compete with while West had Johnson to compete with
this was the difference in the end
Obviously Goodes had no team mates pinching votes of him, unfortunately for Judd, he has Cousins, Kerr and Cox to compete with while West had Johnson to compete with
this was the difference in the end
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:48 pm..
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:04 amDiss beat me to it but why do you think????
Sure post the winner but give those who don't want to know the chance to, "look away now"
Sure post the winner but give those who don't want to know the chance to, "look away now"
Re: **SPOILER** From PhilG
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:25 amPhilG wrote:Adam Goodes wins his second Brownlow - well done!
My "least preferred" winner
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:25 am..
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:32 amYou might not but there are others that believe it so we need to respect their wishes.
FWIW, I want to know the result so I like to find out but I know that not everyone shares my view hence why I didn't post after rd 8 last night.....
FWIW, I want to know the result so I like to find out but I know that not everyone shares my view hence why I didn't post after rd 8 last night.....
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:37 amI made it a spoiler because just because someone is on here, it doesn't mean they want to know who won. And because of that, anything in the HEADING of a topic shouldn't give it away. I know a few people who were watching it and on the PC but didn't want to know.
Makes sense, doesn't it ?
Makes sense, doesn't it ?
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:25 pm..
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:29 pmWell, it's our site - deal with it 
Even if you don't agree, I fail to see how it doesn't make sense to you.
But eh, each to their own.
Even if you don't agree, I fail to see how it doesn't make sense to you.
But eh, each to their own.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:32 pm..
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:32 pmFair effort by Goodes. West stiff, again, but life can be cruel.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:30 pmPhilG wrote:Once it's shown - it's not a spoiler. That's the way I see it, and anything that contradicts that doesn't make sense to me.
But like I said - let's not argue about it.
Correct.
But at that point, it wasn't shown.
Not in Adelaide.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:49 am..
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:04 amPhilG wrote:HUH? I thought it was live in Adelaide!!!! Starting at 7.30 (8.00 in Melbourne)!!!
No ....
It was live on SEN online in Adelaide, and delayed on TV, so you posted it here before it had been completed.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:43 pm..
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:25 pmPhilG wrote:OK - I apologise. I had no idea it was on delay to Adelaide. I wouldn't have posted at all if I'd known that.
Tha'ts cool.
To be honest, it suprised me that you said it didn't make sense - if you knew!!
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:32 pmPhilG wrote:OK - I apologise. I had no idea it was on delay to Adelaide. I wouldn't have posted at all if I'd known that.
Sorry i thought you knew too, i should have explained it in my first post.