Brownlow telecast
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:09 pmAndrew Demeeeeeeeeeeeetriouuuuuuuuuuuuu is calling the names out as if the field has turned for the home straight in the Melbourne Cup!
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:09 pmPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:16 pmI hate that man. He is ruining it.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:18 pmhave any ladies taken their puppies for a walk tonite????? 
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:20 pmHaven't seen any puppies yet and no camel's toes either so far...... 
I mean, Demetriou is just caning the call of the card tonight. Too many interjections from fluffy bit-parts.
I mean, Demetriou is just caning the call of the card tonight. Too many interjections from fluffy bit-parts.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:25 amThe funniest part was Hirds and Voss having their kids on stage, it was good to actually get the count live from Victoria, rather than delayed like in Adelaide.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:56 amAre you blokes seriously complaining about AD reading too fast? Cripes,it takes 3 hours now,imagine if little Max did it for 8 games per round for 22 rounds.YAAAAWN..
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:28 amAt least you blokes got to watch it. It started at 11.30 in the land of the Northern scrum. I had to watch WLF for updates and Fox Footy will be gone this time next week.
regards,
REB
regards,
REB
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:59 amIf the votes are secured by Armaguard, then one would imagine they haven't been seen prior to the call (or thats the message the AFL tries to imply) ... IF that were the case, how do they know which order to read them in over the final rounds, so as to ensure maximum excitement/drama??
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:07 amConstance_Perm wrote:If the votes are secured by Armaguard, then one would imagine they haven't been seen prior to the call (or thats the message the AFL tries to imply) ... IF that were the case, how do they know which order to read them in over the final rounds, so as to ensure maximum excitement/drama??
Some quick thinking by Andrew D?
(Oxymoron, I know)
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:26 pmNFC wrote:I hate that man. He is ruining it.
The Brownlow count or the AFL?
regards,
REB
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:22 pmCoverage was OK..... isnt Sandra Sullt a sour b##ch..... shes the worst going around.....her game show is the worst I have ever seen....
Qauters did OK.... Tim Lane is a d##khead still and Hutchy is just a suckhole.....
Qauters did OK.... Tim Lane is a d##khead still and Hutchy is just a suckhole.....
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:14 pmanother grub wrote:Coverage was OK..... isnt Sandra Sullt a sour b##ch..... shes the worst going around.....her game show is the worst I have ever seen....
Ive heard she has an interesting tatoo in an intersting place and likes horizontal dancing too
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:32 amheater31 wrote:another grub wrote:Coverage was OK..... isnt Sandra Sullt a sour b##ch..... shes the worst going around.....her game show is the worst I have ever seen....
Ive heard she has an interesting tatoo in an intersting place and likes horizontal dancing too
Got any more information about the above, H31?
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:57 amWhy was it on 1/2 an hour delay in SA??? My wife was watching in Victoria and texted me the result thinking SA was getting it live as well. Top work Channel Ten. 
BTW Mattner 11 votes???? Were these umpires doing votes from games they umpired????
BTW Mattner 11 votes???? Were these umpires doing votes from games they umpired????
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:10 pmLeaping Lindner wrote:Why was it on 1/2 an hour delay in SA??? My wife was watching in Victoria and texted me the result thinking SA was getting it live as well. Top work Channel Ten.
BTW Mattner 11 votes???? Were these umpires doing votes from games they umpired????
So they could show that fu^&ed show Idol.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:33 pmConstance_Perm wrote:If the votes are secured by Armaguard, then one would imagine they haven't been seen prior to the call (or thats the message the AFL tries to imply) ... IF that were the case, how do they know which order to read them in over the final rounds, so as to ensure maximum excitement/drama??
I'm assuming they shuffle the order of the games they read out depending on how the leaderboard looks at the time. Those 15 people sitting on that table had to do something of use.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:23 pmZorro wrote:
I'm assuming they shuffle the order of the games they read out depending on how the leaderboard looks at the time. Those 15 people sitting on that table had to do something of use.
Maybe they were having a circle jerk.
regards,
REB
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:50 pmheater31 wrote:
Ive heard she has an interesting tatoo in an intersting place and likes horizontal dancing too
I have heard that too heater!!
The interesting tatoo describes how she wants the person to act whilst she is dancing vertically with them...
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:52 pmblink wrote:heater31 wrote:
Ive heard she has an interesting tatoo in an intersting place and likes horizontal dancing too
I have heard that too heater!!
The interesting tatoo describes how she wants the person to act whilst she is dancing vertically with them...
Staticly?
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:56 pmI would say more along the lines of vigorously!!