SA Footy • View topic

by **Squawk** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:09 pm

Andrew Demeeeeeeeeeeeetriouuuuuuuuuuuuu is calling the names out as if the field has turned for the home straight in the Melbourne Cup!

by **NFC** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:16 pm

I hate that man. He is ruining it. :twisted:

by **heater31** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:18 pm

have any ladies taken their puppies for a walk tonite????? :wink:

by **Squawk** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:20 pm

Haven't seen any puppies yet and no camel's toes either so far......

I mean, Demetriou is just caning the call of the card tonight. Too many interjections from fluffy bit-parts.

by **Brad** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:25 am

The funniest part was Hirds and Voss having their kids on stage, it was good to actually get the count live from Victoria, rather than delayed like in Adelaide.

by **Booney** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:56 am

Are you blokes seriously complaining about AD reading too fast? Cripes,it takes 3 hours now,imagine if little Max did it for 8 games per round for 22 rounds.YAAAAWN..

by **Rik E Boy** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:28 am

At least you blokes got to watch it. It started at 11.30 in the land of the Northern scrum. I had to watch WLF for updates and Fox Footy will be gone this time next week.

regards,

REB

by JK » Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:59 am

If the votes are secured by Armaguard, then one would imagine they haven't been seen prior to the call (or thats the message the AFL tries to imply) ... IF that were the case, how do they know which order to read them in over the final rounds, so as to ensure maximum excitement/drama??

by **Dissident** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:07 am

Constance_Perm wrote:If the votes are secured by Armaguard, then one would imagine they haven't been seen prior to the call (or thats the message the AFL tries to imply) ... IF that were the case, how do they know which order to read them in over the final rounds, so as to ensure maximum excitement/drama??

Some quick thinking by Andrew D?
(Oxymoron, I know)

by **Rik E Boy** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:26 pm

NFC wrote:I hate that man. He is ruining it.

The Brownlow count or the AFL?

regards,

REB

by **another grub** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:22 pm

Coverage was OK..... isnt Sandra Sullt a sour b##ch..... shes the worst going around.....her game show is the worst I have ever seen....
Qauters did OK.... Tim Lane is a d##khead still and Hutchy is just a suckhole.....

by **heater31** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:14 pm

another grub wrote:Coverage was OK..... isnt Sandra Sullt a sour b##ch..... shes the worst going around.....her game show is the worst I have ever seen....

Ive heard she has an interesting tatoo in an intersting place and likes horizontal dancing too :wink:

by **Squawk** » Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:32 am

heater31 wrote:
another grub wrote:Coverage was OK..... isnt Sandra Sullt a sour b##ch..... shes the worst going around.....her game show is the worst I have ever seen....

Ive heard she has an interesting tatoo in an intersting place and likes horizontal dancing too

Got any more information about the above, H31?

by **Leaping Lindner** » Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:57 am

Why was it on 1/2 an hour delay in SA??? My wife was watching in Victoria and texted me the result thinking SA was getting it live as well. Top work Channel Ten. :finga:

BTW Mattner 11 votes???? Were these umpires doing votes from games they umpired???? :-k

by **Brad** » Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:10 pm

Leaping Lindner wrote:Why was it on 1/2 an hour delay in SA??? My wife was watching in Victoria and texted me the result thinking SA was getting it live as well. Top work Channel Ten.
BTW Mattner 11 votes???? Were these umpires doing votes from games they umpired????

So they could show that fu^&ed show Idol.

by **Zorro** » Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:33 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:If the votes are secured by Armaguard, then one would imagine they haven't been seen prior to the call (or thats the message the AFL tries to imply) ... IF that were the case, how do they know which order to read them in over the final rounds, so as to ensure maximum excitement/drama??

I'm assuming they shuffle the order of the games they read out depending on how the leaderboard looks at the time. Those 15 people sitting on that table had to do something of use.

by **Rik E Boy** » Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:23 pm

Zorro wrote:
I'm assuming they shuffle the order of the games they read out depending on how the leaderboard looks at the time. Those 15 people sitting on that table had to do something of use.

Maybe they were having a circle jerk.

regards,

REB

by **blink** » Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:50 pm

heater31 wrote:
Ive heard she has an interesting tatoo in an intersting place and likes horizontal dancing too

I have heard that too heater!!

The interesting tatoo describes how she wants the person to act whilst she is dancing vertically with them... :wink:

by **Booney** » Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:52 pm

blink wrote:
heater31 wrote:
Ive heard she has an interesting tatoo in an intersting place and likes horizontal dancing too

I have heard that too heater!!

The interesting tatoo describes how she wants the person to act whilst she is dancing vertically with them...

Staticly?

by **blink** » Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:56 pm

I would say more along the lines of vigorously!!

Brownlow telecast

Brownlow telecast

Who is online

Around the place

Brownlow telecast

Brownlow telecast

Who is online

Around the place

Join us