SA Footy

Brodlach wrote:Does that mean he isn’t a fan of Buckley?

I'm sure if it was the real Daisy Thomas he'd spell Collingwood correctly.

Brodlach wrote:Does that mean he isn’t a fan of Buckley?

A very poor attempt at humour I'd say.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Does that mean he isn’t a fan of Buckley?

I'm sure if it was the real Daisy Thomas he'd spell Collingwood correctly.

Apparently it was the real one. He apologised for the tweet and took it down.

I occasionally see Thomas do PointsBet promos/odds - I’m certain he isn’t the full quid.

Spargo wrote:I occasionally see Thomas do PointsBet promos/odds - I’m certain he isn’t the full quid.

May have lost a few quid to pointsbet over the years...

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk

amber_fluid wrote:

E3ECC3E0-AE4C-46FA-922D-0706501E604C.jpeg

She is 43 believe it or not!!!!

One thing that is pleasing is there hasn't been the standard pile on kicking a bloke when he's down as we normally see with coaches getting sacked.

Buckley on field cannot be anything but admired, played the game as it should be played and off field he's calm, measured and did everything he could to get Collingwood another flag.

Good to see.

I'm not sure "sacked" is applicable.
From what I'm gathering it was a truly mutual conversation that if he couldn't commit to 3-5 years then it was time for change.

Robbo was sickening on 360 last night sucking up to him something fierce.
He even got a bit snarly when Gerard took the piss ( pun intended) out of him trying to get a question across at the presser.

tigerpie wrote:I'm not sure "sacked" is applicable.
From what I'm gathering it was a truly mutual conversation that if he couldn't commit to 3-5 years then it was time for change.

Robbo was sickening on 360 last night sucking up to him something fierce.
He even got a bit snarly when Gerard took the piss ( pun intended) out of him trying to get a question across at the presser.

Yeah, mutual means sacked.

absolutely he was sacked. The only thing Bucks had control of was his last day at Collingwood which he decided was this weekend.

Booney wrote:

tigerpie wrote:I'm not sure "sacked" is applicable.
From what I'm gathering it was a truly mutual conversation that if he couldn't commit to 3-5 years then it was time for change.

Robbo was sickening on 360 last night sucking up to him something fierce.
He even got a bit snarly when Gerard took the piss ( pun intended) out of him trying to get a question across at the presser.

Yeah, mutual means sacked.

Potatoes tomato's nobody cares.
He may well end up coaching your mob one day.

Thank god Buckley has gone. Collingwood have been the worst team to watch all season long. They freed up a little against Melbourne and wouldn't you know it, they won a game! But the first half was more unwatchable Buckleyball that got his arse marched. Adios FIGJAM.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy wrote:Thank god Buckley has gone. Collingwood have been the worst team to watch all season long. They freed up a little against Melbourne and wouldn't you know it, they won a game! But the first half was more unwatchable Buckleyball that got his arse marched. Adios FIGJAM.

regards,

REB

Totally with you REB
He still wont admit that HIS game plan is shite.
You should hear Mrs. Jimmy when they lapse back into it

He only kept his job because he agreed to change the plan and we ended up in a GF. Suddenly he's a genius.

Levi Greenwood has retired due to ongoing concussion issues.

Don Pyke in the mix for the main job???

If we finish the season off well, could Harvey get the job?
I'm still for chasing clarko at 100, but I don't think we'll get him.

Pyke...no
Voss....maybe.
Lyon....no

tigerpie wrote:If we finish the season off well, could Harvey get the job?
I'm still for chasing clarko at 100, but I don't think we'll get him.

Pyke...no
Voss....maybe.
Lyon....no

I bet Port are getting a bit worried about next week.

tigerpie wrote:If we finish the season off well, could Harvey get the job?
I'm still for chasing clarko at 100, but I don't think we'll get him.

Pyke...no
Voss....maybe.
Lyon....no

Why the No's for Pyke and Lyon out of interest?

Bum Crack wrote:

tigerpie wrote:If we finish the season off well, could Harvey get the job?
I'm still for chasing clarko at 100, but I don't think we'll get him.

Pyke...no
Voss....maybe.
Lyon....no

I bet Port are getting a bit worried about next week.

We'll lose one week at a time thank you

tigerpie wrote:If we finish the season off well, could Harvey get the job?
I'm still for chasing clarko at 100, but I don't think we'll get him.

Pyke...no
Voss....maybe.
Lyon....no

Choco… ?