Port Adelaide 2016

Talk on the national game

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby Booney » Tue May 17, 2016 9:32 pm

How's he had a crack at Port crowds this time?

Should still support his own club....no time, busy trolling Port crowds. Sad. :lol:
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58493
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7518 times
Been liked: 10813 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby MW » Wed May 18, 2016 1:30 pm

Rucci suggesting today that Port and more into Neale than Crows.
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13100
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2633 times
Been liked: 1862 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby bennymacca » Wed May 18, 2016 1:34 pm

MW wrote:Rucci suggesting today that Port and more into Neale than Crows.


Pretty misleading headline, the article mentions Neale possibly wanting to go to Victoria. So if that's the case why bother chasing him.

So not really sure how port gets included in that article other than for clickbait reasons
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby MW » Wed May 18, 2016 1:35 pm

bennymacca wrote:
MW wrote:Rucci suggesting today that Port and more into Neale than Crows.


Pretty misleading headline, the article mentions Neale possibly wanting to go to Victoria. So if that's the case why bother chasing him.

So not really sure how port gets included in that article other than for clickbait reasons


I think it was more a chance to mention "out of contract" Brad Crouch to be honest. Watch for this to be dropped in every article until that contract is signed
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13100
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2633 times
Been liked: 1862 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby bennymacca » Wed May 18, 2016 1:37 pm

There is no way he goes imo. Would be a massive risk for other clubs. And his brother is here.

He would just wait to sign because his contract would be shite now compared to maybe playing half a season of good footy
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby hawks21 » Wed May 18, 2016 1:44 pm

MW wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
MW wrote:Rucci suggesting today that Port and more into Neale than Crows.


Pretty misleading headline, the article mentions Neale possibly wanting to go to Victoria. So if that's the case why bother chasing him.

So not really sure how port gets included in that article other than for clickbait reasons


I think it was more a chance to mention "out of contract" Brad Crouch to be honest. Watch for this to be dropped in every article until that contract is signed

Yeah, great journalism again by Rucci :roll:
The Club and Brad would be silly to entertain a deal at this minute, too risky for both parties.

Rumours in Melbourne suggest Neale wants to go to a Melbourne Club. No doubt Carlton, Richmond, St Kilda throwing massive offers at him.
If he wanted to return to SA then the Crows would be in the box seat with our draft pick selection and salary cap room.
Port no doubt interested but resigned to the fact they would not be able to satisfy Freo's demands or Neale's salary.
User avatar
hawks21
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 85 times
Been liked: 37 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby Booney » Wed May 18, 2016 1:49 pm

bennymacca wrote:There is no way he goes imo. Would be a massive risk for other clubs. And his brother is here.

He would just wait to sign because his contract would be shite now compared to maybe playing half a season of good footy


You guys talk about this in the umpire whinge thread, please? :D
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58493
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7518 times
Been liked: 10813 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby bennymacca » Wed May 18, 2016 1:50 pm

Yeah that's the other good point. Would be a first rounder I would think. Which port don't have (?)

And we would have a fair chunk of room in the cap.

100% the crows would throw a huge offer in front of him. Whether he decides to go to Melbourne is a different matter
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby bennymacca » Wed May 18, 2016 1:51 pm

Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:There is no way he goes imo. Would be a massive risk for other clubs. And his brother is here.

He would just wait to sign because his contract would be shite now compared to maybe playing half a season of good footy


You guys talk about this in the umpire whinge thread, please? :D


He's an important puzzle piece. :)
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby Booney » Wed May 18, 2016 1:59 pm

bennymacca wrote:Yeah that's the other good point. Would be a first rounder I would think. Which port don't have (?)

And we would have a fair chunk of room in the cap.

100% the crows would throw a huge offer in front of him. Whether he decides to go to Melbourne is a different matter


Port will only pay 50% of Ryder and Monfries this year, which means we can pay over the cap next year, yes? I believe you can pay overs the following year if you paid under the TPP in any given year.

Be some money left over from Schulz ( whom I suspect won't go on ) and whatever we're wasting on Butcher.

Having said that, we'll be after youth in the next couple of drafts to sure up whats coming behind this current group and won't,I suspect, trade away 1st rounders in the next year or two. ( We still owe Gold Coast a 2nd rounder for Dixon )
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58493
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7518 times
Been liked: 10813 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby MW » Wed May 18, 2016 2:15 pm

They'll tear the place down if they trade the first rounder again
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13100
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2633 times
Been liked: 1862 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby Booney » Wed May 18, 2016 2:21 pm

MW wrote:They'll tear the place down if they trade the first rounder again


Not "they", I'll do it.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58493
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7518 times
Been liked: 10813 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby valleys07 » Wed May 18, 2016 2:58 pm

Booney wrote:
MW wrote:They'll tear the place down if they trade the first rounder again


Not "they", I'll do it.


Most supporters are all for trading another first rounder :roll:

If they do, Boon- i'll join you.
“Think of me like Yoda, but instead of being little and green I wear suits and I'm awesome. I'm your bro—I'm Broda!”

HOGG Shield 2015 Division I Premiers.
HOGG Shield 2017 Premier League Premiers.
User avatar
valleys07
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9159
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: From a place much more pure than yours
Has liked: 768 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby hawks21 » Wed May 18, 2016 3:10 pm

valleys07 wrote:
Booney wrote:
MW wrote:They'll tear the place down if they trade the first rounder again


Not "they", I'll do it.


Most supporters are all for trading another first rounder :roll:

If they do, Boon- i'll join you.

The place is safe!
Clubs must make at least two first-round selections in each four-year period. If they don't, they will face restrictions from trading any further first-round draft picks.
User avatar
hawks21
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 85 times
Been liked: 37 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby Grahaml » Thu May 19, 2016 12:53 am

Facing restrictions isn't the same thing as will be restricted. AFL just doesn't want to see clubs trading away first rounders for a few years in a row to stay up the top and then fall in an epic hole after. It's hard enough when Melbourne and Carlton do is WITH good picks, let alone without them.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby stan » Thu May 19, 2016 10:40 am

Grahaml wrote:Facing restrictions isn't the same thing as will be restricted. AFL just doesn't want to see clubs trading away first rounders for a few years in a row to stay up the top and then fall in an epic hole after. It's hard enough when Melbourne and Carlton do is WITH good picks, let alone without them.

Bingo, based on how some clubs have gone the AFL sees a need to protect them from there own stupidity.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15244
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1255 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby Booney » Thu May 19, 2016 11:34 am

stan wrote:
Grahaml wrote:Facing restrictions isn't the same thing as will be restricted. AFL just doesn't want to see clubs trading away first rounders for a few years in a row to stay up the top and then fall in an epic hole after. It's hard enough when Melbourne and Carlton do is WITH good picks, let alone without them.

Bingo, based on how some clubs have gone the AFL sees a need to protect them from there own stupidity and greed.


Fixed.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58493
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7518 times
Been liked: 10813 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby GWW » Thu May 19, 2016 1:54 pm

Assuming we finish 9-13, and get a top 10 pick (after taking into account the Academy picks), I think we'll try and target someone like Jonty Scharenberg, who would appear to be compatible with what we need.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15674
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 816 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby hollywood7477 » Thu May 19, 2016 2:16 pm

GWW wrote:Assuming we finish 9-13, and get a top 10 pick (after taking into account the Academy picks), I think we'll try and target someone like Jonty Scharenberg, who would appear to be compatible with what we need.


What another inside mid????
hollywood7477
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:42 pm
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Postby valleys07 » Thu May 19, 2016 2:25 pm

Have paid nil attention to the next crop of youngsters, GWW, not to mention I have not seen a ball kicked in anger in the SANFL this season.

Jonty is a bays player, yeah?

Position, attributes?
“Think of me like Yoda, but instead of being little and green I wear suits and I'm awesome. I'm your bro—I'm Broda!”

HOGG Shield 2015 Division I Premiers.
HOGG Shield 2017 Premier League Premiers.
User avatar
valleys07
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9159
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: From a place much more pure than yours
Has liked: 768 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |