Re: Fox Footy- History Month
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 3:17 pm
It's described it as his fishy smelling substance
LaughingKookaburra wrote:I'll have to try to find it, every time I see my mate he brings it up.
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Back on subject- Watching these games I reckon the game was a better standard 93-96 than it was 97-99?
JK wrote:Leigh Colbert one of the best ever non-paid marks?
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:JK wrote:Leigh Colbert one of the best ever non-paid marks?
Get ****** JK
FFS
I'm still trying to wipe that from my ******* memory
Jim05 wrote:Ablett/Salmon shoot out on tonight. Mid 80's-90's was a much better era to watch than the junk served up now
Spargo wrote:Jim05 wrote:Ablett/Salmon shoot out on tonight. Mid 80's-90's was a much better era to watch than the junk served up now
How'd the previous game shown go Jim?
BZB27 wrote:And why the hell would you put Hird on Ablett
BZB27 wrote:And why the hell would you put Hird on Ablett
BZB27 wrote:What a game ablett got 12.7 still in the 3rd and Salmon has 9.4
Magellan wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Back on subject- Watching these games I reckon the game was a better standard 93-96 than it was 97-99?
Yeah, I'm not sure. I can recall some pretty high quality and high scoring games in the 97-99 period.
Why leads you to believe there's a change in the standard?
I guess one reason might be that the late 90s heralded the genesis of the professionalism that we're seeing today, whereas the early to mid 90s was to my mind a continuation of the style employed in the 1980s.
LaughingKookaburra wrote:I look at both the grand finalists from 93-96 compared to 97-99 and I think the teams from the earlier games are of a better standard. If anything the league was better depth wise in the late 90's but the top end tallent I don't think was as strong.