SA Footy • View topic

by **Brad** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:41 pm

They would have to travel interstate two weeks in a row! :roll:

They never hardly travel interstate and two weeks in a row would be far too much. :lol:

by **sydney-dog** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:50 pm

not to mention they are the laziest side in the top 8, front runners

by **GWW** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:30 pm

"Loser" club!!

by **Punk Rooster** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:13 am

GWW wrote:"Loser" club!!

This "loser" club severely dented Port Chokers chances 2 years in a row- sending them off to a slow painful death the 1st year (beating them at Football Park, what's your excuse for that?), & going in for the kill the 2nd.
The only way you could win a flag was by us not making the 8, & we weren't the best side going around in either of those years.
Now who's the loser club?

by **GWW** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:50 am

Punk Rooster wrote:
GWW wrote:"Loser" club!!

This "loser" club severely dented Port Chokers chances 2 years in a row- sending them off to a slow painful death the 1st year (beating them at Football Park, what's your excuse for that?), & going in for the kill the 2nd.
The only way you could win a flag was by us not making the 8, & we weren't the best side going around in either of those years.
Now who's the loser club?

All i've got to say is 1, yes i'll repeat 1, spelt ONE.....premiership in 50 years!!!! Thats a joke in anyones language!! Perhaps it should have been the club to merge with West Torrens, given their similar records

Port won a premiership after 8 years in the competition, not a bad record you'd have to say!!

Collingwood is all hype, if it was judged solely on performance, it would have been relegated to the VFA years ago. Port Adelaide is a winning club, its had down times, but that is certainly a small minority of instances. Collingwood has failed at crucial times throughout its history to stamp itself as a great club ON THE FIELD. It certainly doesn't deserve the amount of adulation/hype that it gets. Indeed the Collingwood football club is all superficial media "puff" with no substance, just like its number 1 supporter

by **Punk Rooster** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:46 am

1 premiership out 3, taking into account draft tampering= chokers

by **GWW** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:15 am

Punk Rooster wrote:1 premiership out 3, taking into account draft tampering= chokers

Go back and peruse Collingwood's finals performances in the last 50 years and you'll realise who the TRUE chokers are

They arent the Wobbles for no reason. They remain the biggest joke in Australian sport, Queensland in the Sheffield shield has moved out of Collingwood's league, and so has Centrals. You're on your own now Collingwood, how about doing something on the field, or if not maybe watch the 04 premiership on tape to see how to beat the Lions in a GF

by **Punk Rooster** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:22 am

GWW wrote: maybe watch the 04 premiership on tape to see how to beat the Lions in a GF

I'm sure game-hunters also get a thrill out of killing a lame animal...

by **Booney** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:52 am

Q:Why cant Collingwood win the flag?

A: It's not their turn until 2024.

by **Punk Rooster** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:08 am

GWW wrote:All i've got to say is 1, yes i'll repeat 1, spelt ONE.....premiership in 50 years!!!!

Um, 2 in 48, making it 1 in 24 years...

Collingwood reached the 2002 & 2003 GF's despite being 4th or 5th best in the comp in those years.
Over-achievers, not under-achievers...

by **am Bays** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:21 am

Adelaide Crows 2 in 16 years..... :lol:

by **Leaping Lindner** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:24 am

Punk Rooster wrote:
GWW wrote:All i've got to say is 1, yes i'll repeat 1, spelt ONE.....premiership in 50 years!!!!

Um, 2 in 48, making it 1 in 24 years...

Collingwood reached the 2002 & 2003 GF's despite being 4th or 5th best in the comp in those years.
Over-achievers, not under-achievers...

Collingwood are possibly the greatest over achievers in the history of the VFL/AFL. They also over achieved in 1960,64,66,77,79,80 and 81. Mind you I think there greatest over achievement must be 1970. That was the over achievement to beat all over achievements.

by **Punk Rooster** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:26 am

Leaping Lindner wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:
GWW wrote:All i've got to say is 1, yes i'll repeat 1, spelt ONE.....premiership in 50 years!!!!

Um, 2 in 48, making it 1 in 24 years...

Collingwood reached the 2002 & 2003 GF's despite being 4th or 5th best in the comp in those years.
Over-achievers, not under-achievers...

Collingwood are possibly the greatest over achievers in the history of the VFL/AFL. They also over achieved in 1960,64,66,77,79,80 and 81. Mind you I think there greatest over achievement must be 1970. That was the over achievement to beat all over achievements.

Haven't you got micro-films to look at?

by **Leaping Lindner** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:29 am

Punk Rooster wrote:
Leaping Lindner wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:
GWW wrote:All i've got to say is 1, yes i'll repeat 1, spelt ONE.....premiership in 50 years!!!!

Um, 2 in 48, making it 1 in 24 years...

Collingwood reached the 2002 & 2003 GF's despite being 4th or 5th best in the comp in those years.
Over-achievers, not under-achievers...

Collingwood are possibly the greatest over achievers in the history of the VFL/AFL. They also over achieved in 1960,64,66,77,79,80 and 81. Mind you I think there greatest over achievement must be 1970. That was the over achievement to beat all over achievements.

Haven't you got micro-films to look at?

PS - See you sometime in September!

by **THE CHIEF** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:53 pm

Collingwood is all hype, if it was judged solely on performance, it would have been relegated to the VFA years ago. Port Adelaide is a winning club, its had down times, but that is certainly a small minority of instances. Collingwood has failed at crucial times throughout its history to stamp itself as a great club ON THE FIELD. It certainly doesn't deserve the amount of adulation/hype that it gets. Indeed the Collingwood football club is all superficial media "puff" with no substance, just like its number 1 supporter

[/quote]

so why start a thread all about collingwood? collingwood are the most talked about club because ppl like you love talking about us. you can call us chokers but port adelaide has finished runnuers up 35 times! but conveniently port power fans cant recall that fact when spouting off about their "success".

by **Booney** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:17 pm

Shoo troll !

Its time for you to leave..

by **am Bays** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:35 pm

ROTFLMAO reading Port Power and Collingwood supporters diatribe on which club is more pathetic, IMHO both equally as pathetic......

*Incoming!!!*

by **Booney** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:41 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:ROTFLMAO reading Port Power and Collingwood supporters diatribe on which club is more pathetic, IMHO both equally as pathetic......

*Incoming!!!*

Oh Tassie,I agree the argument is futile,your club is clearly the most pathetic of all.....well,South,but they aren't really a club.Oh,and West. :wink:

by **sydney-dog** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:55 pm

the AFL is giving them every opportunity to win the flag, buckley and didak escape suspemsions in the past two weeks, given that players have gone for lesser offences in the past I am a bit confused

by **magpie in the 80's** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:21 pm

even with the help from the AFL i couldnt see collingwood or any team from 5th down to win the flag. top 4 teams are in good form

Why Collingwood couldn't win the flag

Why Collingwood couldn't win the flag

Who is online

Around the place

Why Collingwood couldn't win the flag

Why Collingwood couldn't win the flag

Who is online

Around the place

Join us