by Q. » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:32 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:23 am
by Jase » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:24 am
Q. wrote:It's got to be one of two things.
Team was using OTC type supplements. Sometimes these contain compounds that are prohibited by WADA, ie. DMAA or yohimbine. If this is this case, we are looking at a storm in a teacup.
The other scenario is that they were systematically doping. Perhaps growth hormone compounds or exogeneous Testosterone, but only enough to fall under the prescribed limits set by WADA.
by Q. » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:31 am
Jase wrote:Q. wrote:It's got to be one of two things.
Team was using OTC type supplements. Sometimes these contain compounds that are prohibited by WADA, ie. DMAA or yohimbine. If this is this case, we are looking at a storm in a teacup.
The other scenario is that they were systematically doping. Perhaps growth hormone compounds or exogeneous Testosterone, but only enough to fall under the prescribed limits set by WADA.
So if they are prohibited and they know they are prohibited, then that's systematic breaking of the rules and therefore not a storm in a teacup...
the "Pharmacist" surely would have had to have known this...
Not being argumentative, just think that if there are banned substances in the supplements and these are known about then they should get the same punishment dopers...
IMHO...
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:36 am
by Jim05 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:41 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:could the players book into rehab to escape any potential ban?? or did that loophole get closed?
by Johno6 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:47 am
by cossi11 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:15 am
by Brodlach » Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:27 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by scoob » Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:28 am
Johno6 wrote:afl will lose too much money if they ban the team or the players
maybe a fine and then everything back to normal....
by Brodlach » Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:30 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by LaughingKookaburra » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:01 am
by Hondo » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:06 am
by JK » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:06 am
Jim05 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:could the players book into rehab to escape any potential ban?? or did that loophole get closed?
That only applies to recreational drugs.
PED's dont fall under this banner, reckon we will cop 2 years ban
by Johno6 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:08 am
by Banker » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:09 am
by Johno6 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:13 am
by Footy Smart » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:14 am
Banker wrote:But its the ASADA/WADA conducting the investigation.
The AFL cant neatly sweep this under the carpet like they usually do.
by cossi11 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:27 am
Footy Smart wrote:Banker wrote:But its the ASADA/WADA conducting the investigation.
The AFL cant neatly sweep this under the carpet like they usually do.
Yep, and theyd determine the sanctions dont they?
A VFL player copped an 18 month ban recently for using/importing a pre work out product.
These guys are in trouble! Monfries at port could be in some strife to
by CoverKing » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:37 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |