Page 1 of 3
Other News Topics
Posted:
Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:23 pmby sydney-dog
Just a few things that have got my attention, obviously interested in peoples thoughts.
1. Didak bump, given Roo's suspension couple weeks ago I am a little confused by what is a legal bump and what is an illegal bump.
2. Plenty of talk today that Cats senior playerrs have registered a "no confidence" vote for Bomber
3. Ben Hart, should he play on, my view our defence is strong and have options to cover the loss of Hart over the next year or two, given Ben's last two seasons, his age I think we should free up a spot on the list for a young talent, not sure if the club will make that decision though
Posted:
Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:09 pmby MW
1. Didak should of got a week
2. Bomber will not coach Geelong next year
3. Ben Hart should be given one more year for nothing else but in recognition of his service to the Adelaide Footy Club over the journey
Posted:
Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:17 pmby sydney-dog
MW
But do we want to see Ben go around again if he can't make the best 22
I think he will struggle
Too many champions go that 1 year too long, Smart was a good example
Posted:
Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:19 pmby MW
true hard call has to be made i suppose
Posted:
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:20 pmby Maddogmike
Veterens list - then he doesnt take up room on the list. Im sure he is prob already on it!!
He hasnt played that much footy in the past 12-18 months, I reckon he will play on next year.
Hmmm strange how the Crows have started losing games/players since I deposited a large bet on them to win the GF *shrugs*
Posted:
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:27 pmby magpie in the 80's
with the injuries he has had i think he should pull up stumps and get into an official capacity with in the club if he hasnt already. agree with smart comment. hart should go out on a good note and that hopefully is with another G/F medal
Posted:
Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:51 pmby sydney-dog
my understanding is that you are only allowed two players to be listed as veterans, Roo would be one, so this leaves Hart, Goodwin, Edwards and Macca who would all be over 30 next year,
Posted:
Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:22 pmby Rik E Boy
MW wrote:1. Didak should of got a week
2. Bomber will not coach Geelong next year
3. Ben Hart should be given one more year for nothing else but in recognition of his service to the Adelaide Footy Club over the journey
Yep
Yep
Bollocks to that.
Problem solvered.
regards,
REB
Posted:
Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:38 pmby Dutchy
sydney-dog wrote:my understanding is that you are only allowed two players to be listed as veterans, Roo would be one, so this leaves Hart, Goodwin, Edwards and Macca who would all be over 30 next year,
the veterans list doesnt give you extra spots on the list so they still take the position of a younger player....all the veterans list does is show only half their salary in the cap, therfore allowing you flexability to pay the others on your list.
Posted:
Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:41 pmby magpie in the 80's
i think some people lose the plot when we suggest we give a player an extra year due to his service to the AFC. IMO he's had a fantastic career thanks to the AFC. but agree with REB bollocks. bring in some new blood hart can be covered easily we've been doing it the last 2 years
Posted:
Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:48 pmby sydney-dog
magpie in the 80's
agree
Posted:
Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:50 pmby sydney-dog
magpie in the 80's
agree
Posted:
Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:40 pmby sydney-dog
other footy talking points
Aka - demons and bombers seem to be the front runners for his services
Hawks, sign 5 year deal to play games in Tassie, but the deal also includes naming rights, not sure how hawks members feel about being called the Tassie Hawks
Posted:
Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:23 amby mal
sydney-dog wrote:other footy talking points
Aka - demons and bombers seem to be the front runners for his services
Hawks, sign 5 year deal to play games in Tassie, but the deal also includes naming rights, not sure how hawks members feel about being called the Tassie Hawks
Another 5 years of misery.
Posted:
Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:20 amby MatteeG
The Hawthorn "Tassie" Hawks?
We dont call Port the Port Adelaide Vodafone Power do we? Just a sponsor lads.
Play on...
Posted:
Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:29 amby Punk Rooster
MatteeG wrote:The Hawthorn "Tassie" Hawks?
We dont call Port the Port Adelaide Vodafone Power do we? Just a sponsor lads.
Play on...
Nup, just Port Power!
Posted:
Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:32 amby Booney
Punk Rooster wrote:MatteeG wrote:The Hawthorn "Tassie" Hawks?
We dont call Port the Port Adelaide Vodafone Power do we? Just a sponsor lads.
Play on...
Nup, just Port Power!
Posted:
Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:54 pmby sydney-dog
Pagan to be axed and end up at Geelong, Barry Mitchell or Silvani to get the Carlton gig
Interesting how a club can claim to be broke and need afl assistance but then pay out 2 years remaining on a coaches contract
Memo to AFL, Place some stronger guidelines when it comes to handing out rescue packages
Memo to Melb based clubs, time you boys start getting your shite together
Posted:
Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:50 pmby Punk Rooster
I doubt Pagan will go, won't be surprised that Bomber does.
Posted:
Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:44 pmby Dutchy
sydney-dog wrote:Pagan to be axed and end up at Geelong, Barry Mitchell or Silvani to get the Carlton gig
Interesting how a club can claim to be broke and need afl assistance but then pay out 2 years remaining on a coaches contract
Memo to AFL, Place some stronger guidelines when it comes to handing out rescue packages
Memo to Melb based clubs, time you boys start getting your shite together
Part of the equalisaton payment they get comes after the AFL viewing their business plan and cash flows and I can assure you that paying out Pagan for 2 years ($1.2m - he left the Roos as we would only pay him $500k p.a.) wouldnt be in their budgets/plans.
Pagan isnt the problem...he was handed a dog trying to run in a horse race...doesnt matter who you are if you dont have the cattle you cant expect performances, they need to think long term....Pagan will coach them next year for many many resons.