SA Footy

Dislike

They should only replace the existing one if its an improvement but this one isnt, its quite average.

whats the old one again?

Looks shit.

Had prob the best logo, why change it?

whats wrong with the new one i even have my glasses on at looks good

gossipgirl wrote:whats wrong with the new one i even have my glasses on at looks good

Its got a tiger on it!

The more I look at it, the more I like it.
So long as they don't put it on the guernsey like we did.

I like the concept but the face looks to happy. Needs to look angrier.

The new one has more artistic style but lacks the aggression of the old one.
I don't feel strongly either way..

Although not formally trained in the art of reading big cat body language, I would suggest the "new" logo represents an inquisitive tiger as opposed to the "old" logo where the tiger appears to be demonstrating some form of aggression.

Thoughts Psyber?

I reckon the chest and the way it holds it's head is meant to represent a certain pride, but agree with D14 and Pysber that it's facial epxression could be more aggressive

I like the new one. Bolder. The old one looks 'messy'.

Well it hasn't made like Richmond anymore than before. I guess the real test will be after the first 6 games next year when the memberships start getting cut up. Some might think twice with the new logo.

auto wrote:Had prob the best logo, why change it?

Prob because the eyes on the old one were looking at '9' oclock, must've been considered a bad omen....

New one looks like a nagging female tiger.
Old one wasnt good but was better than the new one.
Only decent "tiger" emblem Ive seen is the Bengals in the NFL but thats mainly because their colours are more like a tigers and less like a bumble bee.

Looks unfinished...

It works quite well I reckon. The new Tiger is quite obviously looking up longingly from 9th position, a very good representation IMO.

Magpiespower wrote:Looks unfinished...

Exactly what I was thinking, Times New Roman....