by Dutchy » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:12 am
by Psyber » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:29 am
by Gingernuts » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:32 pm
by Sojourner » Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:14 pm
by Dutchy » Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:15 pm
Gingernuts wrote:
That said, I think the club has done pretty well to sign the 'key' players of the clubs future. In the past 2 or 3 months they've signed Vince, Talia, McKernan, Walker, MacKay, Porps, Otten and a host of others. Many of these had huge speculation surrounding them regarding interstate moves. Gunston & Davis are definitely ones that got away (Maric & Armstrong not so much) but if you look at the bigger picture I think the list managers have worked their butts off to make sure KPP's and key midfielders have stayed.
by heater31 » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:49 pm
by Gingernuts » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:16 pm
Dutchy wrote:Gingernuts wrote:
That said, I think the club has done pretty well to sign the 'key' players of the clubs future. In the past 2 or 3 months they've signed Vince, Talia, McKernan, Walker, MacKay, Porps, Otten and a host of others. Many of these had huge speculation surrounding them regarding interstate moves. Gunston & Davis are definitely ones that got away (Maric & Armstrong not so much) but if you look at the bigger picture I think the list managers have worked their butts off to make sure KPP's and key midfielders have stayed.
Yet all of the above players played SANFL footy at some stage in 2011, and Porps played a few in 2010.
Amazing how it turns, only a month ago we were talking about Port not being able to sign their kids, yet they have and the Crows are losing them.
by Dutchy » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:29 pm
by heater31 » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:05 pm
Dutchy wrote:Talia, Vince, Walker & Porps all played SANFL cause they couldnt make the 22, short memory...
by catchisthecry » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:37 pm
by Hondo » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:20 pm
by Pat Malone » Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:40 am
by Media Park » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:50 am
Pat Malone wrote:Davis is a traitor, end of story.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by stan » Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:00 am
Hondo wrote:Davis was poached by huge dollars from GWS so I think that case has to be treated as somewhat isolated. If you read too much into it then you have to do the same with all the GC and GWS recruits. Does Geelong have deep rooted problems because Ablett walked out? Do Melbourne with Scully? Bulldogs with Ward?
Maric has clearly lost the number one ruck job to Jacobs and some other clubs are badly short in their ruck stocks. Griffin at Freo is a similar case. When you aren't getting the opportunities at your current club and another club offers you those same opportunities then you look at them. He is 26 next year and far from a "kid". He needs to find a number 1 rick gig quick smart before his career ends and he won't find it at Adelaide. Good luck to him actually - I'd like to see him get a starting job and us get something decent in return.
However, losing Gunston and Armstrong is disappointing in that both are promising players who seeming have good opportunities at Adelaide and are choosing to go elsewhere. Not that I am completely sold on Armstrong but I'd prefer we kept him. That said, we'll get a draft pick or another kid in return so as one door closes another opens.
We have more key kids signed than not and honestly I could only see Davis and Gunston being key players in our next premiership threat. Losing Davis really sucks TBH.
by Gingernuts » Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:46 am
stan wrote:Hondo wrote:Davis was poached by huge dollars from GWS so I think that case has to be treated as somewhat isolated. If you read too much into it then you have to do the same with all the GC and GWS recruits. Does Geelong have deep rooted problems because Ablett walked out? Do Melbourne with Scully? Bulldogs with Ward?
Maric has clearly lost the number one ruck job to Jacobs and some other clubs are badly short in their ruck stocks. Griffin at Freo is a similar case. When you aren't getting the opportunities at your current club and another club offers you those same opportunities then you look at them. He is 26 next year and far from a "kid". He needs to find a number 1 rick gig quick smart before his career ends and he won't find it at Adelaide. Good luck to him actually - I'd like to see him get a starting job and us get something decent in return.
However, losing Gunston and Armstrong is disappointing in that both are promising players who seeming have good opportunities at Adelaide and are choosing to go elsewhere. Not that I am completely sold on Armstrong but I'd prefer we kept him. That said, we'll get a draft pick or another kid in return so as one door closes another opens.
We have more key kids signed than not and honestly I could only see Davis and Gunston being key players in our next premiership threat. Losing Davis really sucks TBH.
Yeah, but they are imploding anyway at the moment.
Honestly I dont think there are any real major issues down at the Crows. A new coach will freshen them up abit me thinks and I believe they will have a reason season next year.
As for Losing Gunston - well crap look at who we lost because had to cry himself to sleep because he wasent in VictoriaOnly kidding there, Im not that bitter. On a serious note you'll always tend to lose one player to homesickness at some stage, Davis took an offer that is considered out of the norm, and well Maric is not in your best 22 if you have tippett in the side. However if you traded tipett then Maric would be there as the 2nd ruck man. As for Armstrong, well he played some good football towards the end of the season and if he wants to leave I'm not sure this is a huge loss.
by The Dark Knight » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:16 am
Media Park wrote:Pat Malone wrote:Davis is a traitor, end of story.
I've been struggling to put this into perspective. For us blokes who play/did play country footy on a saturday for the love of a club, if we were offered a bit of coin to play for an opposition club, then I could cop the traitor tag.
However, Phil Davis is a football player- that is his profession.
It would be like a rival retailer in my town offering me more money to go and do the same work for them, for more money.
It's going to benefit me financially, and help me set up for my future.
Just because he (Davis) is a football player, is it any different?
by Gingernuts » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:21 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Media Park wrote:Pat Malone wrote:Davis is a traitor, end of story.
I've been struggling to put this into perspective. For us blokes who play/did play country footy on a saturday for the love of a club, if we were offered a bit of coin to play for an opposition club, then I could cop the traitor tag.
However, Phil Davis is a football player- that is his profession.
It would be like a rival retailer in my town offering me more money to go and do the same work for them, for more money.
It's going to benefit me financially, and help me set up for my future.
Just because he (Davis) is a football player, is it any different?
Spot on.
by JK » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:48 am
Sojourner wrote:
Personally I thing Stephen Triggs tenure at the AFC needs to be ended.
by Gingernuts » Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:35 am
JK wrote:Sojourner wrote:
Personally I thing Stephen Triggs tenure at the AFC needs to be ended.
X2
by Psyber » Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:42 am
I'm not a Trigg fan either, but after seeing what behaviour caused Norwood to implode late in Neil Balme's tenure there, and the similar events at Melbourne, I wouldn't be all that keen on recruiting him.Sojourner wrote:Think its no coincidence that the Crows have taken a tumble down the ladder since John Reid retired from the club, I would agree that JR would likely have dealt with isses a lot better than the way it has been left since.
Personally I thing Stephen Triggs tenure at the AFC needs to be ended, I do think the club can do much better and that his performance has been one of the weaker links in the chain. Triggs failure to accept that Craig could no longer do the job to the standard required and to simply stand there looking like a deer caught in the headlights when challenged by the media over it was unacceptable and a clear indicator that he too no longer has the capacity to do the job to the standard that would be required at Collingwood, Geelong or any other top four side in the AFL. Its not good enough at the AFC just to keep someone because they have been there for a long time, the person needs to be there because they are the best person for the job.
My suggestion is that the AFC need to do whatever it takes to get Neil Balme back to SA, he is across the SANFL situation and has performed over and above at Collingwood and Geelong. Think he is the kind of man that along with Sanderson will lead the AFC back up the ladder and back to being seriously competitive at this level.
Think also that the game is changing and the "go home" factor to Melbourne will continue to be an issue at the AFC. Whilst they have to do due dillagence to picking the best player available they also need to give more consideration to lads from SA so that the investment made into there careers pays good dividends to the club. Whilst a player may be a good short term pick, the longer term must be considered more carefully and I do think the AFC have fallen down in this area also.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |