Page 1 of 1
Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:57 pm
by sapaul
3 - S.Thompson
2 - R.Sloane
1 - J.Petrenko
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:05 am
by Interceptor
3. Jacobs
2. Thompson
1. Sloane
Johncock obviously BOG until injured.
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:00 am
by fuzz
3. Thompson
2.Sloane
1. Johncock (Still gets a vote despite only playing 1 1/2 quarters. Considered giving him 3 anyway. Once Johncock went off the game turned immediately)
Others in best were Petrenko, Jacobs, Jaensch, Tippett
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:49 am
by NFC
3. Thompson
2. Jacobs
1. Sloane
Johncock and Jaensch would've easily been on the list if they played full games, as they were both dominating.
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:27 am
by bloods08
3 Sloane
2 Thompson
1 Petrenko
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:12 pm
by tiger07andbeyond
sapaul wrote:3 - S.Thompson
2 - R.Sloane
1 - J.Petrenko
as above
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:09 am
by Sorry Dude
3.Petrenko
2.Jacobs
1.Johncock
VB, Reilly very dishonourable mentions and non existent in the game. Actually I take that back. They were noticable but, only for the mistakes and non efforts they put in.
On a side note. Are the AFC regretting the choice to give VB the captaincy?
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:30 am
by Psyber
SD, I think you are looking at VB with a jaundiced eye, or a short memory.
There have been times this season when he has taken crucial contested marks and been a very productive player.
Johncock and others have been patchy, too, and Thompson has probably been our most consistent, though, I agree, clanger prone..
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:49 am
by Gingernuts
I agree Psyber. I think VB will make a fine captain with time.
Votes for me:
3. Petrenko
2. Jacobs
1. Sloane
Otten, Thompson, Talia all receive honorable mentions.
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:51 am
by Sorry Dude
Psyber wrote:SD, I think you are looking at VB with a jaundiced eye, or a short memory.
There have been times this season when he has taken crucial contested marks and been a very productive player.
Johncock and others have been patchy, too, and Thompson has probably been our most consistent, though, I agree, clanger prone..
But as a leader to be making silly decisions I feel can be prevented out weighs the positive. Don't get me wrong he has done some very good things but they are not sitting in my short memory
Yes Johncock has been patchy but, his positives have outweighted his negatives.
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:11 pm
by bloods08
Sorry Dude wrote:Psyber wrote:SD, I think you are looking at VB with a jaundiced eye, or a short memory.
There have been times this season when he has taken crucial contested marks and been a very productive player.
Johncock and others have been patchy, too, and Thompson has probably been our most consistent, though, I agree, clanger prone..
But as a leader to be making silly decisions I feel can be prevented out weighs the positive. Don't get me wrong he has done some very good things but they are not sitting in my short memory
Yes Johncock has been patchy but, his positives have outweighted his negatives.
I reckon if Johncock hadn't played this year, we would be very lucky to have won a game. Saved our arses many a time.
Re: Votes vs Essendon

Posted:
Fri Jul 22, 2011 9:19 pm
by sapaul
Final votes
16 - S.Thompson (3)
12 - R.Sloane (2)
9 - J.Petrenko (1)
9 - S.Jacobs
2 - G.Johncock
Petrenko got the 1 vote on countback.
Petrenko(3, 3, 1, 1, 1)
Jacobs (3, 2, 2, 2)