by Rushby Hinds » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:40 am
by Rik E Boy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:24 pm
by Booney » Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:26 pm
by blink » Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:28 pm
by blink » Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:29 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:See our blokes wouldn't do that..you'd have to show fight first.
regards,
REB
by sydney-dog » Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:24 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:46 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by MW » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:19 pm
by GWW » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:42 pm
MW wrote: would rather Ben Johnson misses
by smac » Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:33 am
by Rik E Boy » Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:32 am
smac wrote:Spineless tactics off the field implies they can't handle themselves in a real fight - another indication that the AFL has softened the players. Stand toe-to-toe and fight like men!!!
by Punk Rooster » Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:10 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by MightyEagles » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:17 am
by Punk Rooster » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:41 am
maybe that's one reason why you're not in charge of an AFL club...MightyEagles wrote:According to Mick, if your a new player and did the same thing, they would miss games, but if it's the older players, that it's allright to those things and that all clubs would do the same thing. Sorry to say this mick, but not if I was in charge of an AFL club, all players should be treated the same.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Rik E Boy » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:54 am
Punk Rooster wrote:maybe that's one reason why you're not in charge of an AFL club...
All Malthouse has done, is admit what all clubs think anyway...
by am Bays » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:55 am
Punk Rooster wrote:maybe that's one reason why you're not in charge of an AFL club...MightyEagles wrote:According to Mick, if your a new player and did the same thing, they would miss games, but if it's the older players, that it's allright to those things and that all clubs would do the same thing. Sorry to say this mick, but not if I was in charge of an AFL club, all players should be treated the same.
All Malthouse has done, is admit what all clubs think anyway...
by am Bays » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:58 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:maybe that's one reason why you're not in charge of an AFL club...
All Malthouse has done, is admit what all clubs think anyway...
Ha ha. That's what I thought when I read that. Despite my mellow line before, you wouldn't expect any bloke to cop it sweet if someone comes after you. After all, as Kenny (Rogers, not G Booney LOL) said 'sometimes you gotta fight, when you're a man'.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:06 am
by am Bays » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:49 am
Rik E Boy wrote:So that is why West Coast suspended Gardiner when Cox was injured and they had a weak inexperienced ruck division...
No, West Coast suspended Gardiner because he is a repeat offender and a goose of the highest order. I don't think you can compare the Collingwood lads to this geniear5e.
by blink » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:49 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |