Page 1 of 2
Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 5:40 pm
by sapaul
Post away.

Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 5:41 pm
by sapaul
3 - B.Reilly
2 - M.Jaensch
1 - K.Tippett
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 6:08 pm
by NFC
3. Jaensch
2. Tippett
1. Schmidt
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 6:17 pm
by Interceptor
3. Jaensch
2. Tippett
1. Sloane
Many bad players.
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 6:25 pm
by tiger07andbeyond
Sloane? Is that a joke. Like the kid but only battled today mate, wasnt Robinson Crusoe tho.
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 6:35 pm
by Interceptor
tiger07andbeyond wrote:Sloane? Is that a joke. Like the kid but only battled today mate, wasnt Robinson Crusoe tho.
Not it's not a joke
Didn't have a heap of possessions, but put in a decent effort, tacked well and was reasonably effective in what he did.
Schmidt wasn't bad and could've got a vote as well.
Lets see your votes expert

Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 6:44 pm
by tiger07andbeyond
Jeansch
Radar
VB
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 7:03 pm
by Interceptor
tiger07andbeyond wrote:Jeansch
Radar
VB
Both Reilly and VB are very average players.
They were in the top 6 today, I'll give them that, but for the experience they have now, neither is tough enough in the contest, are tackled too easily and frequently have ordinary disposal. Thompson should've been captain ahead of VB.
GC will break even or win the clearances next week because we have a weak midfield with players who aren't putting in the effort required and/or poor skills.
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 7:05 pm
by tiger07andbeyond
they had a few friends who werent tough enough at the contest.
especially TW

Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 8:41 pm
by Gingernuts
3 - Tippett
2 - Reilly
1 - Johncock
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 8:52 pm
by 200 Killer Wasps
3- Johncock
2- Tippett
1- Jaensch
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 8:52 pm
by Gingernuts
Interceptor wrote:tiger07andbeyond wrote:Sloane? Is that a joke. Like the kid but only battled today mate, wasnt Robinson Crusoe tho.
Not it's not a joke
Didn't have a heap of possessions, but put in a decent effort, tacked well and was reasonably effective in what he did.
Schmidt wasn't bad and could've got a vote as well.
Lets see your votes expert

In all seriousness tiger, is there a chance you might post something after a win one of these days? I think I've only ever seen you spew vitriol after losses, it's not a good look mate.
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 9:14 pm
by bloods08
3 Tippett
2 Reilly
1 Johncock
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 9:26 pm
by tiger07andbeyond
Gingernuts wrote:Interceptor wrote:tiger07andbeyond wrote:Sloane? Is that a joke. Like the kid but only battled today mate, wasnt Robinson Crusoe tho.
Not it's not a joke
Didn't have a heap of possessions, but put in a decent effort, tacked well and was reasonably effective in what he did.
Schmidt wasn't bad and could've got a vote as well.
Lets see your votes expert

In all seriousness tiger, is there a chance you might post something after a win one of these days? I think I've only ever seen you spew vitriol after losses, it's not a good look mate.
Sorry Ginge, I will put a note in my diary to post next week after beating the gold coast suns by 5 goals and let you all know how TW, Craigy and the boys are all champions and match winners.
I might even post that 'the gold coast were blown away by a powerful side' or 'this is the most exciting list ever at the crows'.
Hang on I better not say that I might get asked to coach.
Do you not think my points are valid ginge? Not many posatives to gloat about at the moment mate. Oh but we have the suns this week

Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 9:38 pm
by sapaul
We'll beat Gold Coast by more than 5 goals.
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 9:46 pm
by Gingernuts
Why is it that you never have anything to say after a win mate? That's all I'm asking.
You are a prolific poster after a loss, but I have never seen you post anything after a win. We've had a couple of good ones this year, surely there was something to take out of those games?
It's easy to jump on an internet forum and snipe away at coaches and players, and IMO that's all you do. In some kind of macbre way I think you like it when the Crows lose, because then you can stalk your way around the online world under the cover of anonimity and make yourself feel like a legend by slagging off every man and his dog. I could be completely wrong, but that's the way it appears to me.
I admire your passion tiger, I just question why we don't see it when the team has a positive result.
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 9:50 pm
by Interceptor
Gingernuts wrote:I admire your passion tiger, I just question why we don't see it when the team has a positive result.
Another case of someone who just wants to sink the boot in to Craig after a loss.
He'd fit right in over on the Adelaide forum of Big Footy.
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 10:08 pm
by tiger07andbeyond
Interceptor wrote:Gingernuts wrote:I admire your passion tiger, I just question why we don't see it when the team has a positive result.
Another case of someone who just wants to sink the boot in to Craig after a loss.
He'd fit right in over on the Adelaide forum of Big Footy.
Sorry, only posatives to be mentioned on footy SA.
We are a powerful side and this is the most exciting crows sqaud ever. Maric is the best ruckman in the AFL.
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Sun May 08, 2011 11:14 pm
by Tassie Blues
3 votes for the melbourne media for pumping up the dees this week. also didnt help that the crows looked like the just wanted a weekend away in melbourne rather than 4 prem points
Re: Votes vs Melbourne

Posted:
Mon May 09, 2011 10:00 am
by hawks21
3. Tippett
2. Reilly
1. Jaensch