Page 1 of 1
players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:09 amby best on hill
it is in my opinion that if a player is hurt injured and is in the hands of the trainers they should be left alone. in the match between geelong st kilda jimmy bartel was hurt and in the hands of the trainers making his way of the ground when a cowardly st player tried to hit were he was injured. this is not the first time it had happen. richmond v hawthorne this year, and the most publicised was brisbane v st kilda a few years back. comments please!
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:44 amby Barto
The players are supposed to leave an opposition bloke alone if he's actually with the trainers, the trainer does have a right to tell players to move away if the situation warrants it. With the Riewoldt incident against Brisbane I dont recall the trainers being with him at the time.
Which quarter did this happen? I haven't seen the game and want to have a look.
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:49 amby Bum Crack
Barto wrote:The players are supposed to leave an opposition bloke alone if he's actually with the trainers, the trainer does have a right to tell players to move away if the situation warrants it. With the Riewoldt incident against Brisbane I dont recall the trainers being with him at the time.
Which quarter did this happen? I haven't seen the game and want to have a look.
Last quarter. Just to watch the elbow from Stevie J on Baker is worth it. They will both be getting a rest for a couple of weeks I think.
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:19 pmby best on hill
Barto wrote:The players are supposed to leave an opposition bloke alone if he's actually with the trainers, the trainer does have a right to tell players to move away if the situation warrants it. With the Riewoldt incident against Brisbane I dont recall the trainers being with him at the time.
Which quarter did this happen? I haven't seen the game and want to have a look.
it was only about 5 mins to go in the last qtr. jimmy was on his way to the bench at the time.
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:09 pmby CUTTERMAN
Baker deserved it, hand slapping wanker at best. Play footy and leave the hand holding to milne.
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:11 pmby The Dark Knight
CUTTERMAN wrote:Baker deserved it, hand slapping wanker at best. Play footy and leave the hand holding to milne.
That was absolutely hilarious. It did work though, he made Johnson crack.
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:36 amby Rik E Boy
best on hill wrote:it is in my opinion that if a player is hurt injured and is in the hands of the trainers they should be left alone. in the match between geelong st kilda jimmy bartel was hurt and in the hands of the trainers making his way of the ground when a cowardly st player tried to hit were he was injured. this is not the first time it had happen. richmond v hawthorne this year, and the most publicised was brisbane v st kilda a few years back. comments please!
The one with Nick a few years back is a bit different to what happened with Bartel but not Johnson. St Nick and Dog stayed on the field but Bartel was trying to leave the field and as such should not have been considered 'fair game'.
regards,
REB
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:37 amby Rik E Boy
The Dark Knight wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Baker deserved it, hand slapping wanker at best. Play footy and leave the hand holding to milne.
That was absolutely hilarious. It did work though, he made Johnson crack.
Johnson was injured and was going to miss matches so he thought he might as well make it worth his while. But he'll tell the mrp that he cracked.
regards,
REB
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:58 amby Booney
After seeing the Bartel incident, what a storm in a tea cup this is. Nothing in it and barely worth commenting on.
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:29 amby Rik E Boy
Booney wrote:After seeing the Bartel incident, what a storm in a tea cup this is. Nothing in it and barely worth commenting on.
I prefer a hand in a D Cup.....
although, Booney you have just commented on it....barely.
regards,
REB
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:38 amby Bum Crack
Rik E Boy wrote:Booney wrote:After seeing the Bartel incident, what a storm in a tea cup this is. Nothing in it and barely worth commenting on.
I prefer a hand in a D Cup.....
although, Booney you have just commented on it....barely.
regards,
REB
All hell would have broken loose if it was a Power Puff Cake though
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:25 pmby Barto
Booney wrote:After seeing the Bartel incident, what a storm in a tea cup this is. Nothing in it and barely worth commenting on.
I've seen it now and agree. Nothing in it.
I got the impression the St Kilda player was concentrating on what was happening up ground when Bartel and the doc/physio crossed his path.
Re: players who are in the hands of trainers
Posted:
Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:31 pmby Barto
Called it:
In other incidents, Saint Sam Fisher was cleared of making unnecessary contact with an injured Jimmy Bartel as he left the field hyper-extending his elbow.
"From all available vision that was viewed, including vision that was not broadcast during the match telecast, the play downfield then moved at the time that Bartel moves into Fisher’s path to begin leaving the ground," the panel said in a statement.
"Fisher has his eyes on the play down the ground and steps forward and minor contact is made by Fisher to Bartel. The panel said that Fisher’s focus was play at the end of the ground and the contact was not deemed unreasonable in the circumstances."
http://sportal.com.au/afl-news-display/ ... ozen-93936