by duncs7 » Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:27 am
by Booney » Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:38 am
by blink » Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:25 am
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:35 am
by blink » Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:51 am
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:23 pm
blink wrote:If you had no intention of being treated, then why go to the hospital in the first place??
Like I said, it is probably just a coincidence that the guy decided to rob Gary Ablett when it could have been anyone (and I hope this is what truly occurred) - but when you factor in Gary's past it does make you wonder, REB....
Then again, you shouldn't always judge someone based on their past indiscretions either.
by Booney » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:48 pm
MW wrote:No doubt he deserved it. The guy is a knob.
by Blue Boy » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:49 pm
MW wrote:No doubt he deserved it. The guy is a knob.
by MW » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:49 pm
Booney wrote:MW wrote:No doubt he deserved it. The guy is a knob.
Know him well MW or just judging from afar?
by MW » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:51 pm
Blue Boy wrote:MW wrote:No doubt he deserved it. The guy is a knob.
No one deserves to be robbed / bashed - no one
Please think before you type and post hey !!!
by Booney » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:58 pm
MW wrote:Blue Boy wrote:MW wrote:No doubt he deserved it. The guy is a knob.
No one deserves to be robbed / bashed - no one
Please think before you type and post hey !!!
No one deserves to die from taking drugs given to them from another person...allegedly
by MW » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:59 pm
Booney wrote:MW wrote:Blue Boy wrote:MW wrote:No doubt he deserved it. The guy is a knob.
No one deserves to be robbed / bashed - no one
Please think before you type and post hey !!!
No one deserves to die from taking drugs given to them from another person...allegedly
Im trying to think of something to say here,like,you found him guilty but a coroners inquiry didnt,or,you have obviously had all the facts laid out in front of you,or,STRIKE ME PINK!
by Booney » Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:03 pm
by MW » Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:04 pm
Booney wrote:Well that clears it all up then. Allegedly takes your liability away,not your intent.
by Booney » Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:11 pm
MW wrote:Booney wrote:Well that clears it all up then. Allegedly takes your liability away,not your intent.
Did I name anyone? You've been watching too much Law and Order Booney
by RustyCage » Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:39 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Even a one eyed Catter such as myself would agree that he is certainly no angel and his part in the death of his younger female compainion was less than heroic to say the least.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:44 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Even a one eyed Catter such as myself would agree that he is certainly no angel and his part in the death of his younger female compainion was less than heroic to say the least.
She was a much to blame as he was. For some reason people feel sorry for her. Its her fault shes dead, not his.
by Mr66 » Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:45 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |