SA Footy

http://www.afc.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Three players suspended

Three Adelaide players have been suspended from the AFL for one week.

Bernie Vince, Matthew Jaensch and Graham Johncock will not be available for AFL selection this week.

The suspensions - for breaching training and preparation standards - were recommended by the senior leadership group and endorsed by the senior coach and selection committee.

All three players will be available to play in the SANFL. If Johncock is not fit to play this weekend, his suspension will be held over until he is available.
afc.com.au

I wonder if they went to Bali on a holiday with the Thunderbirds....

**** me. The place is going to the dogs.

Very silly Jaenschy, Princess Voice will give you a clip next time she sees you. Come to think of it you'll probably enjoy that

Sturt and the Eagles will be very happy.
cant really Comment until people Know what happens.
not too smart by Matthew Jaensch, he almost didnt get drafted because of his off field troubles before the under 18s

Voice wrote:Very silly Jaenschy, Princess Voice will give you a clip next time she sees you. Come to think of it you'll probably enjoy that

Is this Jaensch second offence of this nature since he was 17.

Sometimes talent can only take you so far.

Will add >please don't avoid the swear filter< Vince will probably for the Eagles now this week.

not surprised Johncock was involved and his commitment has to be questioned after several sightings of him on the gas. He seems to get away with a lot.
Wouldnt worry me if they left him out for good. It would be 5 less turnovers in the backline.

what happened to his 2008 'lifestyle programme' ?

Whats the point in suspending players from AFL duty but still letting them play SANFL.

bulldog2004 wrote:Whats the point in suspending players from AFL duty but still letting them play SANFL.

Not sure, but I don't have a problem with it given Norwood have the bye.

whufc wrote:

Voice wrote:Very silly Jaenschy, Princess Voice will give you a clip next time she sees you. Come to think of it you'll probably enjoy that

Is this Jaensch second offence of this nature since he was 17.

Sometimes talent can only take you so far.

Have to agree have known Janeschy for a little while and thought he had lernt his lesson got a golden oppertunity and has now pissed it up the wall

bulldog2004 wrote:Whats the point in suspending players from AFL duty but still letting them play SANFL.

Because they wouldn't be guarenteed to be straight back in the week after their suspension. If they go back to their SANFL team and show the application they require then that would justify them being selected following the suspension. If they don't play then surely they wouldn't be a walk up start in the week following (thus effectively becoming a longer than one week suspesion in essence) as they wouldn't have been able to prove that they have the commitment to show they should be back in.

**** 'em. Glad they're down and out. The amount of shit I've had flung at me re the Blues being crap & Fev being a dickhead etc, it's great !

And where is Gossip Girl. How's your captain fairing now ?

SJABC wrote:**** 'em. Glad they're down and out. The amount of **** I've had flung at me re the Blues being crap & Fev being a dickhead etc, it's great !

And where is Gossip Girl. How's your captain fairing now ?

GG isn't posting much these days

Voice wrote:

bulldog2004 wrote:Whats the point in suspending players from AFL duty but still letting them play SANFL.

Because they wouldn't be guarenteed to be straight back in the week after their suspension. If they go back to their SANFL team and show the application they require then that would justify them being selected following the suspension. If they don't play then surely they wouldn't be a walk up start in the week following (thus effectively becoming a longer than one week suspesion in essence) as they wouldn't have been able to prove that they have the commitment to show they should be back in.

Wouldn't not playing at all make it even harder for them to get back into the side.
Punishment seems a tad soft imho. Especially considering the Crows are only playing for pride. I think they had a chance here to set a really good standard to the rest of the squad but 1 week pfft, especially after such an insipid performace, these 3 as well aren't especially on fire at the moment and should probably be trying to do all the right things to avoid being dropped.

They should of suspended the 19 who werent out doing whatever it was the 3 were doing... maybe they were trying a new training regime..god knows what they are doing ATM isnt working!

The thing is that none of us know what they've actually done so we have no idea what the punishment should or shouldn't be. Everybody has been assuming it's alcohol related (including the media) when the noises that are filtering through to me are that it wasn't.
Not sure we should be speculating this much until we know exactly what the players have done.

Who cares what they've done. I blame Goodwin.

Voice wrote:The thing is that none of us know what they've actually done so we have no idea what the punishment should or shouldn't be. Everybody has been assuming it's alcohol related (including the media) when the noises that are filtering through to me are that it wasn't.
Not sure we should be speculating this much until we know exactly what the players have done.

True,

but have heard from a family member who live in Melbourne it was DEFINATLY alcohol related.

silly boys wold have given them more than a week