When does Craig become responsable?
Is his job on the line?
It's time for a change, sorry.
Time to look to 2011.

by Dog_ger » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:34 pm
by tiger07andbeyond » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:36 pm
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by Turbo » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:46 pm
tiger07andbeyond wrote:No , Craigy will be fine . He has a free pass. The game plan is great, Our rucks are the best in the comp and the 4 oldies are dominating! We rock! We will still finish top 4 and still win the flag!
by southee » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:47 pm
by The Dark Knight » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:56 pm
by stampy » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:58 pm
by Baron Greenback » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:45 pm
by The Dark Knight » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:47 pm
Chuck Norris wrote:Bickley to take over mid-season.
Finally a bloke with a footy brain in charge.
by whufc » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:49 pm
by Dog_ger » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:51 pm
whufc wrote:Crows 2010 season over,
can't make top 4 now
can't win premiership from outside top 4 under current finals format.
by southee » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:04 pm
Chuck Norris wrote:Bickley to take over mid-season.
Finally a bloke with a footy brain in charge.
by Columbo » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:11 pm
by whufc » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:11 pm
Dog_ger wrote:whufc wrote:Crows 2010 season over,
can't make top 4 now
can't win premiership from outside top 4 under current finals format.
I don't think we have ever been in a position to win a flag under Craig?
by dedja » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:16 pm
by stampy » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:37 pm
Columbo wrote: With so many injuries of late does it mean the training methods need to be questioned?
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:39 pm
Columbo wrote:Had they not lost Bock and Danger today, fair chance they would have held on
by Columbo » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:59 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Columbo wrote:Had they not lost Bock and Danger today, fair chance they would have held on
Good sides over come injuries during games, AND BEAT LAST YEARS WOODEN SPOONERS. Take a look at St Kilda for example. Makes McDermotts article about Mark Harvey look even dumber. Crows have under achieved in the last few years, and are about to spend a couple of seasons at the foot of the table.
by Gingernuts » Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:04 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Columbo wrote:Had they not lost Bock and Danger today, fair chance they would have held on
Good sides over come injuries during games, AND BEAT LAST YEARS WOODEN SPOONERS. Take a look at St Kilda for example. Makes McDermotts article about Mark Harvey look even dumber. Crows have under achieved in the last few years, and are about to spend a couple of seasons at the foot of the table.
by Ruben Carter » Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:12 pm
Gingernuts wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Columbo wrote:Had they not lost Bock and Danger today, fair chance they would have held on
Good sides over come injuries during games, AND BEAT LAST YEARS WOODEN SPOONERS. Take a look at St Kilda for example. Makes McDermotts article about Mark Harvey look even dumber. Crows have under achieved in the last few years, and are about to spend a couple of seasons at the foot of the table.
I'm actually wondering now whether the Crows have actually overachieved in the last couple of years and given everyone a false sense of how good they actually are.
Really really disappointed with the result today, only watched to half time and thought they were playing well enough to close it out fairly well but was shocked to get home and see that scoreboard.
Don't even know what to think at the moment to be honest. Shattered.
by catchisthecry » Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:12 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |