Page 1 of 3

Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:29 am
by The Sleeping Giant
Has to be the most laughable Top 50 list ever.

Bernie Vince at 10.
Luke Ball at 19. Still plays for St kilda apparently.
Robbie Gray at 47.

But the biggest laugh was Nic Naitanui at 48.

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:52 pm
by CK
From reading the article, the criteria appeared to be the Top 50 players for delivering entertainment value, rather than the criteria Mike Sheahan uses for the Top 50 best players at a given time. This might alter the perception in that case.

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:10 pm
by The Dark Knight
Yeah very laughable indeed. The top 5 looks good carn't say much about the rest though. Carn't believe Dom Cassisi isn't in there he would be in my top 50 before Robbie Gray any day of the week. Keen to see Mark Ricciutos Top 50 on Monday

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:36 pm
by JK
The Dark Knight wrote:Keen to see Mark Ricciutos Top 50 on Monday


1. Goodwin
2. Goodwin
3. Goodwin
4. Goodwin
5. Goodwin
etc, etc. ;)

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 3:18 pm
by The Dark Knight
Constance_Perm wrote:
The Dark Knight wrote:Keen to see Mark Ricciutos Top 50 on Monday


1. Goodwin
2. Goodwin
3. Goodwin
4. Goodwin
5. Goodwin
etc, etc. ;)


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:00 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
CK wrote:From reading the article, the criteria appeared to be the Top 50 players for delivering entertainment value, rather than the criteria Mike Sheahan uses for the Top 50 best players at a given time. This might alter the perception in that case.


So using Rucci's criteria, Mark Jackson and Warwick Capper must have been the two greatest players of all time.

Still doesn't explain Bernie Vince at 10.

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:46 pm
by goraw
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
CK wrote:From reading the article, the criteria appeared to be the Top 50 players for delivering entertainment value, rather than the criteria Mike Sheahan uses for the Top 50 best players at a given time. This might alter the perception in that case.


So using Rucci's criteria, Mark Jackson and Warwick Capper must have been the two greatest players of all time.

Still doesn't explain Bernie Vince at 10.


:lol: :lol:

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 am
by stan
Rucci's top 50 always has a few controversal selections. Last year he did the same thing. This year is no different, and also to the Advertiser, if your that hard up for something to write in the sport section, then heck leave it blank, more people will look at it ;)

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:55 am
by Ian
stan wrote:Rucci's top 50 always has a few controversal selections.


Attention seaker looking for a reaction, would do much better as a writer doing fiction novels

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:41 pm
by stan
Ian wrote:
stan wrote:Rucci's top 50 always has a few controversal selections.


Attention seaker looking for a reaction, would do much better as a writer doing fiction novels


yeah agree with that. Ive never met the bloke so Im not sure what hes like, so this is nothing personal but his writing is terrible. I love the way he turns on all teams so very quickly.

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:44 pm
by Dutchy
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Has to be the most laughable Top 50 list ever.

Bernie Vince at 10.
Luke Ball at 19. Still plays for St kilda apparently.
Robbie Gray at 47.

But the biggest laugh was Nic Naitanui at 48.


Gray and Boak in the Top 50, give me a break :roll:

No room for Brent Harvey or Drew Petrie?

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:01 pm
by rogernumber10
I thought you could find a spot for Scott Pendlebury, Marc Murphy, Brett Deledio and Joel Corey somewhere? And maybe Steve Johnson too?

On entertainment value, Johnson, Murphy and Deledio certainly stack up, but I'm not sure how Luke Ball does.

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:01 pm
by Ruben Carter
Dutchy wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Has to be the most laughable Top 50 list ever.

Bernie Vince at 10.
Luke Ball at 19. Still plays for St kilda apparently.
Robbie Gray at 47.

But the biggest laugh was Nic Naitanui at 48.


Gray and Boak in the Top 50, give me a break :roll:

No room for Brent Harvey or Drew Petrie?

Dutchy - are you serious? Both Gray and Boak are destined for greatness. Harvey was good in his day and Petrie gets a bit of it - move with the times ... can't believe you haven't mentioned Mick Nolan and Xavier Tanner as well :roll: . We'll all know how correct Rucci is by the end of 2010 - right now everything is speculative and subject to discussion & opinion. I can't believe he left out Daniel Rich... another potential superstar !!! and Marc Murphy also..

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:07 pm
by Q.
Ruben Carter wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Gray and Boak in the Top 50, give me a break :roll:

No room for Brent Harvey or Drew Petrie?

Dutchy - are you serious? Both Gray and Boak are destined for greatness. Harvey was good in his day and Petrie gets a bit of it - move with the times ...


Surely you are also having a lend...

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:12 pm
by Dutchy
so just cause you think they are "destined for greatness" they are in the top 50 footy players in the land?

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:30 am
by Wedgie
I was destined for greatness when I was 7, where am I in the list? Rucc and Ruben have to be having a lend. Either player would be struggling to make my top 250 let alone 50.

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:48 am
by Bum Crack
Rucci is a peanut. I saw Roo's Top 50 today and that is a lot more realistic.

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:45 pm
by Swervyn
Bum Crack wrote:Rucci is a peanut. I saw Roo's Top 50 today and that is a lot more realistic.


K. Tippet is no.10 haha think he forgot to add another 0

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:54 pm
by OnSong
I reckon he would be attracting a contract offer in the top 10.

Re: Rucci's Top 50

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:12 pm
by Booney
All the experts on here should do a Top 50 and then we can pick them apart and laugh at them.

Get 50 people to do Top 50's and you'd have 50 different lists.

You blokes must be jealous. I think its because Rucci gets paid for writing crap and you blokes dont. :lol: