Page 1 of 3

Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:47 pm
by hearts on fire
who are the bigger chokers?

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:54 pm
by Booney
Not a great poll lad.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:56 pm
by Jimmy_041
You forgot the both option

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:24 pm
by Hondo
Terrible thread / poll

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:26 pm
by RoosterMarty
I voted for HOF.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:41 pm
by silicone skyline
I voted for Port. Why would I choose Adelaide? Lol

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:14 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
I voted for the SANFL trying to provide a concise Magarey Medal update service.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:57 pm
by Thiele
I voted who cares

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:22 pm
by Voice
They can both choke eachother for all I care. I'm off to choke the chicken 8)

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:09 pm
by stan
Adelaide Hawk wrote:I voted for the SANFL trying to provide a concise Magarey Medal update service.


Man I didnt even realise it was on, and then bang in the paper the winners.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:27 am
by Rik E Boy
Not your finest work hof.

regards,

REB

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:21 am
by Psyber
Looks like HOF has voted 9 times himself. ;)
Port 64% [ 16 ]
Crows 36% [ 9 ]

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:47 pm
by redden whites
The Crows...fairly obvious I would have thought!!

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:14 pm
by gossipgirl
i would have thought collingwood are the real chokers of the AFL, only winning 1 premiership since the AFL started, considering the dream draws they have each year, rarely have to travel and being the richest club around. hopefully they stay on only 1 permiership as well not that i am bitter or twisted :roll:

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:41 pm
by stan
gossipgirl wrote:i would have thought collingwood are the real chokers of the AFL, only winning 1 premiership since the AFL started, considering the dream draws they have each year, rarely have to travel and being the richest club around. hopefully they stay on only 1 permiership as well not that i am bitter or twisted :roll:


You do have a point. Although except for 2003 it was really the only GF they were probably close to favourites in.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:04 pm
by Punk Rooster
gossipgirl wrote:i would have thought collingwood are the real chokers of the AFL, only winning 1 premiership since the AFL started, considering the dream draws they have each year, rarely have to travel and being the richest club around. hopefully they stay on only 1 permiership as well not that i am bitter or twisted :roll:

Ok, I'm gonna be honest here- Collingwood should wear the chokers tag, as in the 70's it was apt.
The early 80's, I believe they came up against superior sides (correct me if wrong).
The 90's, well they won there first flag (as underdogs ).
In 1995, they travelled to Perth for an unwinnable final- they got within 5pts.
After a period out of finals action, they return, & in 2002, travel to Adelaide coming off a 50pt thumping from the Bulldogs, to play red-hot favourites, Port Power. Collingwood win aginst the odds, Paul Licuria picking up 38 odd touches whilst stopping Josh Francou.
They then beat the Crow's at the G, & won the right to lose to the rampaging Brisbane Lions- albeit by a very honourable 9pts (in terrible conditions)
Next year, a juiced up Brisbane side (thanks to their Medical Staff) thrash a helpless Collingwood- no choke here, the Lions are 3 time Premiers.
In 2007, the Pies travel to Perth & win a blockbuster game in extra time- only to back up to eventual Premiers Geelong, but not before giving them an almighty scare (losing by 7pts).
Last week, the Crows are red-hot favourites & up by 41 pts- yet Collingwood win.

Collingwood are not chokers, & left that tag behind in the 80's- winning the 1990 Premiership was the cure for that disease.

As for current chokers, we have Port Power (early 2000's prior to their Premiership), but should St Kilda miss a GF, that would be be considered a choke.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:27 pm
by stan
Punk Rooster wrote:
gossipgirl wrote:i would have thought collingwood are the real chokers of the AFL, only winning 1 premiership since the AFL started, considering the dream draws they have each year, rarely have to travel and being the richest club around. hopefully they stay on only 1 permiership as well not that i am bitter or twisted :roll:

Ok, I'm gonna be honest here- Collingwood should wear the chokers tag, as in the 70's it was apt.
The early 80's, I believe they came up against superior sides (correct me if wrong).
The 90's, well they won there first flag (as underdogs ).
In 1995, they travelled to Perth for an unwinnable final- they got within 5pts.
After a period out of finals action, they return, & in 2002, travel to Adelaide coming off a 50pt thumping from the Bulldogs, to play red-hot favourites, Port Power. Collingwood win aginst the odds, Paul Licuria picking up 38 odd touches whilst stopping Josh Francou.
They then beat the Crow's at the G, & won the right to lose to the rampaging Brisbane Lions- albeit by a very honourable 9pts (in terrible conditions)
Next year, a juiced up Brisbane side (thanks to their Medical Staff) thrash a helpless Collingwood- no choke here, the Lions are 3 time Premiers.
In 2007, the Pies travel to Perth & win a blockbuster game in extra time- only to back up to eventual Premiers Geelong, but not before giving them an almighty scare (losing by 7pts).
Last week, the Crows are red-hot favourites & up by 41 pts- yet Collingwood win.

Collingwood are not chokers, & left that tag behind in the 80's- winning the 1990 Premiership was the cure for that disease.

As for current chokers, we have Port Power (early 2000's prior to their Premiership), but should St Kilda miss a GF, that would be be considered a choke.


The lions Limped into that GF. Also should I remind you that you beat the lions at the MCG in the Qualifying final. So I would say you had the chance then.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:41 am
by Punk Rooster
Yes we beat the Lions in the QF, but we did not go in as red-hot fav's.
Geelong of last year was more of a "choke", yet I would not label it such, as both the Cats & the Hawks were standouts for the year.
Collingwood came up against an extremely dominant outfit in Brisbane, who were good enough to win 3 i a row.
As for limping into that GF, why do you think the I paid kudos to the medical staff?
The Lions had more jabs in the butt than a group of private school boys.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:03 am
by the big bang
Punk Rooster wrote:
gossipgirl wrote:i would have thought collingwood are the real chokers of the AFL, only winning 1 premiership since the AFL started, considering the dream draws they have each year, rarely have to travel and being the richest club around. hopefully they stay on only 1 permiership as well not that i am bitter or twisted :roll:

Ok, I'm gonna be honest here- Collingwood should wear the chokers tag, as in the 70's it was apt.
The early 80's, I believe they came up against superior sides (correct me if wrong).
The 90's, well they won there first flag (as underdogs ).
In 1995, they travelled to Perth for an unwinnable final- they got within 5pts.
After a period out of finals action, they return, & in 2002, travel to Adelaide coming off a 50pt thumping from the Bulldogs, to play red-hot favourites, Port Power. Collingwood win aginst the odds, Paul Licuria picking up 38 odd touches whilst stopping Josh Francou.
They then beat the Crow's at the G, & won the right to lose to the rampaging Brisbane Lions- albeit by a very honourable 9pts (in terrible conditions)
Next year, a juiced up Brisbane side (thanks to their Medical Staff) thrash a helpless Collingwood- no choke here, the Lions are 3 time Premiers.
In 2007, the Pies travel to Perth & win a blockbuster game in extra time- only to back up to eventual Premiers Geelong, but not before giving them an almighty scare (losing by 7pts).
Last week, the Crows are red-hot favourites & up by 41 pts- yet Collingwood win.

Collingwood are not chokers, & left that tag behind in the 80's- winning the 1990 Premiership was the cure for that disease.

As for current chokers, we have Port Power (early 2000's prior to their Premiership), but should St Kilda miss a GF, that would be be considered a choke.



rekon it was 5 points. less than a kick.

Re: Who are the real chokers? Port or Crows?

PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:49 pm
by CoverKing
Punk Rooster wrote:
gossipgirl wrote:i would have thought collingwood are the real chokers of the AFL, only winning 1 premiership since the AFL started, considering the dream draws they have each year, rarely have to travel and being the richest club around. hopefully they stay on only 1 permiership as well not that i am bitter or twisted :roll:

Ok, I'm gonna be honest here- Collingwood should wear the chokers tag, as in the 70's it was apt.
The early 80's, I believe they came up against superior sides (correct me if wrong).
The 90's, well they won there first flag (as underdogs ).
In 1995, they travelled to Perth for an unwinnable final- they got within 5pts.
After a period out of finals action, they return, & in 2002, travel to Adelaide coming off a 50pt thumping from the Bulldogs, to play red-hot favourites, Port Power. Collingwood win aginst the odds, Paul Licuria picking up 38 odd touches whilst stopping Josh Francou.
They then beat the Crow's at the G, & won the right to lose to the rampaging Brisbane Lions- albeit by a very honourable 9pts (in terrible conditions)
Next year, a juiced up Brisbane side (thanks to their Medical Staff) thrash a helpless Collingwood- no choke here, the Lions are 3 time Premiers.
In 2007, the Pies travel to Perth & win a blockbuster game in extra time- only to back up to eventual Premiers Geelong, but not before giving them an almighty scare (losing by 7pts).
Last week, the Crows are red-hot favourites & up by 41 pts- yet Collingwood win.

Collingwood are not chokers, & left that tag behind in the 80's- winning the 1990 Premiership was the cure for that disease.

As for current chokers, we have Port Power (early 2000's prior to their Premiership), but should St Kilda miss a GF, that would be be considered a choke.


Change the facts to suit your arguement??