Page 1 of 2

Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:54 pm
by Thiele
Geelong easy

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:57 pm
by hearts on fire
Geelong by 50+ points.

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:41 pm
by Thiele
B: Michael Pettigrew, Toby Thurstans, Jacob Surjan
HB:Nathan Krakouer, Troy Chaplin, Peter Burgoyne
C: Danny Meyer, Dom Cassisi, Tom Logan
HF: Robert Gray, Warren Tredrea, David Rodan
F: Brett Ebert, Brendon Lade, Justin Westhoff
R: Dean Brogan, Kane Cornes, Danyle Pearce
Interchange from: Josh Carr, Jason Davenport, Alipate Carlile, Nick Lower, Matthew Westhoff, Matthew Broadbent, Paul Stewart
IN: Broadbent, Carlile, Davenport, Krakouer, Lower, P Stewart
OUT: Daniel Motlop (ankle), Marlon Motlop, Steven Salopek (omitted)

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:52 pm
by Thiele
B: Darren Milburn, Matthew Scarlett, Andrew Mackie
HB: Corey Enright, Tom Harley, James Kelly
C: Gary Ablett, Steve Johnson, Travis Varcoe
HF: Jimmy Bartel, Cameron Mooney, Joel Corey
F: Paul Chapman, Tom Hawkins, Shannon Byrnes
Foll: Mark Blake, Cameron Ling, Joel Selwood
I/C (from): Ryan Gamble, David Johnson, Shane Mumford, Max Rooke, Mathew Stokes, Simon Hogan, Harry Taylor

In: Harley, Hogan, Stokes
Out: -

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:52 pm
by wycbloods
Thiele wrote:B: Michael Pettigrew, Toby Thurstans, Jacob Surjan
HB:Nathan Krakouer, Troy Chaplin, Peter Burgoyne
C: Danny Meyer, Dom Cassisi, Tom Logan
HF: Robert Gray, Warren Tredrea, David Rodan
F: Brett Ebert, Brendon Lade, Justin Westhoff
R: Dean Brogan, Kane Cornes, Danyle Pearce
Interchange from: Josh Carr, Jason Davenport, Alipate Carlile, Nick Lower, Matthew Westhoff, Matthew Broadbent, Paul Stewart
IN: Broadbent, Carlile, Davenport, Krakouer, Lower, P Stewart
OUT: Daniel Motlop (ankle), Marlon Motlop, Steven Salopek (omitted)


So it looks like Salopek is the one who is copping the flak for the poor performances of his team mates.

Peter Burgoyne must be doing something very well to keep his spot, i am sure Salopek would like to know what it is.

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:58 pm
by dedja
That 119 points is going to be given a shake ...

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:25 pm
by auto
FFS, I know Salopek hasnt been playing well, but there are others whose heads should have been on the chopping block b4 Salopek. Dont believe Thurstans will start at full back while Carlisle is on the bench. Hopefully Lower, Stewart and Broadbent get a game. If Port can get within Cooeee weve done well. Just wondering what the odds would be on a Port win?

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:29 pm
by auto
Krackhore and Burgoyne on the half back flanks look very dangerous for Port. Esp if Johnson and Chapman line up as the opposing half forwards.

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:34 pm
by GWW
^ Looks very ordinary agree, fortunately these days teams very rarely line up as their named in the press.

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:14 am
by Magpiespower
Cats by 93 points...

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:40 am
by Rik E Boy
Cats by 17 points because we can't be arsed turning up for matches against struggling teams.

regards,

REB

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:55 am
by Booney
Must say, I am really looking forward to this one... :roll:

Geelong will play like carp we'll blitz for 2 quarters, surprise a few people and lose by 70+.

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:04 pm
by amber_fluid
wycbloods wrote:
Thiele wrote:B: Michael Pettigrew, Toby Thurstans, Jacob Surjan
HB:Nathan Krakouer, Troy Chaplin, Peter Burgoyne
C: Danny Meyer, Dom Cassisi, Tom Logan
HF: Robert Gray, Warren Tredrea, David Rodan
F: Brett Ebert, Brendon Lade, Justin Westhoff
R: Dean Brogan, Kane Cornes, Danyle Pearce
Interchange from: Josh Carr, Jason Davenport, Alipate Carlile, Nick Lower, Matthew Westhoff, Matthew Broadbent, Paul Stewart
IN: Broadbent, Carlile, Davenport, Krakouer, Lower, P Stewart
OUT: Daniel Motlop (ankle), Marlon Motlop, Steven Salopek (omitted)


So it looks like Salopek is the one who is copping the flak for the poor performances of his team mates.

Peter Burgoyne must be doing something very well to keep his spot, i am sure Salopek would like to know what it is.



you could put Pettigrew and Pearce in the same boat as Burgoyne............very lucky to hold their spots IMO.

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:22 pm
by Slots It Through
Not sure dropping Salopek is the right move, i agree Burgoyne, Pearce and probably Carr should have been the first to go.

Good move bringing in Broadbent and Stewart.

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:59 pm
by NO-MERCY
How is Ebert still getting a game? :roll:

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:32 pm
by Thiele
Final Teams

Geelong
B: Darren Milburn, Matthew Scarlett, Andrew Mackie
HB: Corey Enright, Tom Harley, James Kelly
C: Gary Ablett, Steve Johnson, Travis Varcoe
HF: Jimmy Bartel, Cameron Mooney, Joel Corey
F: Paul Chapman, Tom Hawkins, Shannon Byrnes
Foll: Mark Blake, Joel Selwood, Cameron Ling
I/C: David Johnson, Shane Mumford, Max Rooke, Harry Taylor
Emg: Ryan Gamble, Mathew Stokes, Simon Hogan

In: Harley
Out: Ryan Gamble

Port Adelaide
B: Michael Pettigrew, Toby Thurstans, Jacob Surjan
HB: Nathan Krakouer, Troy Chaplin, Peter Burgoyne
C: Danny Meyer, Domenic Cassisi, Tom Logan
HF: Robert Gray, Warren Tredrea, David Rodan
F: Brett Ebert, Brendon Lade, Justin Westhoff
Foll: Dean Brogan, Kane Cornes, Danyle Pearce
I/C: Josh Carr, Jason Davenport, Alipate Carlile, Nick Lower
Emg: Matthew Broadbent, Paul Stewart, Matthew Westhoff

In: Carlile, Davenport, Krakouer, Lower
Out: Daniel Motlop (ankle), Marlon Motlop, Steven Salopek, Matthew Westhoff

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:31 pm
by JK
Thought Port took what they had to from the game ... They were competitive for much of the it, and return home with their pride intact.

Obviously would have preferred a win, but in realistic terms I think they'd be quietly happy with yesterdays performance.

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:56 pm
by Footy Smart
Constance_Perm wrote:Thought Port took what they had to from the game ... They were competitive for much of the it, and return home with their pride intact.

Obviously would have preferred a win, but in realistic terms I think they'd be quietly happy with yesterdays performance.


Serious???? Port were not competative in the first half... hardly had the footy when ya did they couldnt go froward and turned it over!!! then in the last Qtr Geelong put the que in the rack looking towards the Saints!!!!!!!! i was expecting them to come out fired up and deliver something but all i got to watch was geelong train for 2.5 quarter

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:09 pm
by Rik E Boy
Constance_Perm wrote:Thought Port took what they had to from the game ... They were competitive for much of the it, and return home with their pride intact.

Obviously would have preferred a win, but in realistic terms I think they'd be quietly happy with yesterdays performance.


LMAO. We were in about second gear nearly all day. At Lemon time Bomber told the boys to take it easy FFS. Geelong were Foxing big time and Port are rank and won't make the eight.

regards,

REB

Re: Geelong vs Port

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:39 pm
by JK
Rik E Boy wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:Thought Port took what they had to from the game ... They were competitive for much of the it, and return home with their pride intact.

Obviously would have preferred a win, but in realistic terms I think they'd be quietly happy with yesterdays performance.


LMAO. We were in about second gear nearly all day. At Lemon time Bomber told the boys to take it easy FFS. Geelong were Foxing big time and Port are rank and won't make the eight.

regards,

REB


LOL Not everything is about your boys, as you should have noticed Reberta, I was commenting on Port ... Seriously, what do you think Port stood to take out of the game?