by dinglinga » Tue May 16, 2006 1:27 pm
by Blue Boy » Tue May 16, 2006 1:41 pm
dinglinga wrote:i think its about time the afl made some hard decisions... the afl should now tell clubs that require financial assistance that if we( afl) are going to give u money that u either relocate, merge with another club or if u dont do that u can try and survive urself.
it might seem abit harsh but y keep propping up clubs that always need cash ....
by doggies4eva » Tue May 16, 2006 3:38 pm
Blue Boy wrote:dinglinga wrote:i think its about time the afl made some hard decisions... the afl should now tell clubs that require financial assistance that if we( afl) are going to give u money that u either relocate, merge with another club or if u dont do that u can try and survive urself.
it might seem abit harsh but y keep propping up clubs that always need cash ....
They need 16 teams ding or no 780 million dollars.
by Magpiespower » Tue May 16, 2006 3:46 pm
by Mr66 » Tue May 16, 2006 8:43 pm
by stan » Tue May 16, 2006 10:48 pm
Mr66 wrote:Canberra Kangaroos & Gold Coast Bulldogs?
West Sydney Bulldogs??
Hmm.. eh..?
by Magpiespower » Wed May 17, 2006 6:02 am
by PhilG » Wed May 17, 2006 6:31 pm
by stan » Wed May 17, 2006 6:44 pm
PhilG wrote:I disagree about Canberra. I think it can work there. They like their AFL enough - heck the local league marches all over the league in Sydney!
Sydney doesn't have the market for a second team. Thugby is still in charge, and the only place a second Sydney team can draw from is the Swan's base. And that isn't happening!
The Gold Coast could support a team. Southport FC is one of the strongest clubs financially in the country - even stronger than a lot of AFL clubs. There was a rumour that they could make the jump themselves, but there would have to be a collapse in Victoria first.
I agree that nine clubs in Melbourne is way too much.
by Magpiespower » Thu May 18, 2006 1:29 am
PhilG wrote:I disagree about Canberra. I think it can work there. They like their AFL enough - heck the local league marches all over the league in Sydney!
by Punk Rooster » Thu May 18, 2006 5:06 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by PhilG » Thu May 18, 2006 10:51 am
by dinglinga » Thu May 18, 2006 3:11 pm
by Magpiespower » Thu May 18, 2006 4:39 pm
PhilG wrote:The Raiders are a bad example, which in fact backs my point up - because Canberrans are getting sick of thugby (both varieties). The AFL should strike while the iron is hot. Before the advent of the Raiders, the biggest drawing local activity was the ACTAFL. And the fans are still there. I wouldn't go on the current crowds at Manuka. There are only three or four games a year there, so there's no way a proper following could be established. Now if a team actually moved there - that would alter matters entirely.
I lived in Canberra for two years. I umpired locally. Believe me I know. The only thing that would stop it is the lack of lighting at Manuka. But I'm sure the ACT government would fund it in a heartbeat if someone announced they were moving there. And it could be used for cricket as well (I know the ACB were keen on that).
by Rik E Boy » Thu May 18, 2006 4:58 pm
by PhilG » Thu May 18, 2006 6:32 pm
by Magpiespower » Fri May 19, 2006 4:36 am
Alex Jesaulenko and James Hird (both from Eastlake if I recall correctly).
by doggies4eva » Fri May 19, 2006 9:34 am
Magpiespower wrote:For a truly national comp, it would be great to have both Canberra and Tassie in the AFL, but I can't see it happening.
If it were to happen, both teams would need to be heavily subsidised by the AFL.
And we're talking a Sydney/Brisbane style subsidy here.
The AFL were obviously prepared to bite the bullet one those teams because they played in such big markets.
But Canberra and Hobart? Hmmm...
by Magpiespower » Fri May 19, 2006 9:48 am
doggies4eva wrote:
But thats the point Magpiespower. It would have to be subsidised probably for a fair while (say 10 years) but they are subsidising Melbourne teams now and there's no future in it. The Sydney/Brisbane scenarios show that if the plan is stuck to and the new cities develop watchable teams then the support builds. But the fact is the real $s for the game come from TV. Selling a product that is a "National Game" without representation from Tassie and ACT is a bit questionable.
by Booney » Fri May 19, 2006 9:59 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |