SA Footy

Disgraceful, gutless act by Kangaroos players.
You thought Nathan Bock's issues with women were disgraceful, take a look at how the North Melbourne players perceive them:

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/comm ... 01,00.html

BTW, just why did the chicken cross the road?

Meh....

*ahem*

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=21334

*ahem*

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=21464

Anyway DW, good pick up...

Showing some chicken...er I mean ShinBoner spirit.

Officially: Disgraceful!!!!
Unofficially: Hilarious!!!

Apart from being made public I cant see what was wrong with it? its a chook not a human FFS!

Dutchy wrote:Apart from being made public I cant see what was wrong with it? its a chook not a human FFS!

Exactly- one cock usually services many hens...

an edited version is here.
http://www.triplem.com.au/melbourne/sho ... -3igi.html
Now i see it as funny and wrong it should have been kept in house

Mr66 wrote:Officially: Disgraceful!!!!
Unofficially: Hilarious!!!

Spot on. $10 000 'fine'? You've got to be joking.

I reckon Nathan Bock Bock Bock is probably also involved.

regards,

REB

I just saw the video on the Adelaide Now website,
Do AFL players have too much time on their hands?
This would be something I'd expect a bunch of teenagers to put together.

Dutchy wrote:Apart from being made public I cant see what was wrong with it? its a chook not a human FFS!

It does convey an implicit abusive and demeaning attitude to sex and women in it, even to the background sound "Move Bitch". One player admitted his wife was "devastated" by his involvement.
http://au.sports.yahoo.com/news/article ... d-facebook

A Mum wrote:I just saw the video on the Adelaide Now website,
Do AFL players have too much time on their hands?
This would be something I'd expect a bunch of teenagers to put together.

A lot of AFL listed players are teenagers.

What's the outrage here? Was the chicken not organically grown free-range?

silicone skyline wrote:What's the outrage here? Was the chicken not organically grown free-range?

Sick of being the butt of tired gags in prop comedy, a rubber chicken goes in search of love. The cold reality is that, due to the stigma surrounding rubber chickens, the only love he can find is from a dead chicken. This hard truth and the graphic depiction of chicken necrophilia has the conservative lobbies up in arms, unable to appreciate the confronting piece of art that has been created.

It was a gripping drama. I actually can relate to Boris in many ways aside from the chicken sex. It looked like one of those foreign dramas on SBS after 10pm.

If you look past the chicken sex, you really begin to appreciate the dichotomy being presented. Rubber chickening is a livelihood, but at the same time it is a livelihood that real chickens don't take seriously. How can Boris live and be loved at the same time? Finding refuge in a dead chicken is both heartbreaking and heartwarming. Truly a touching piece of imagery.

IMO, he was a lonely rubber chicken, frowned upon in the chicken fraternity. Outcast, he searched for deeper meaning to his life. He formed a relationship, but she wanted to much. It was only once she died that he actually realised how much he loved her.

Ahh yes, but in her death Boris can then have her forever! Clearly the writer's have been influenced by Robert Browning's poem Porphyria's Lover. They have created a masterpiece!

I'm giving this one 4 out of 5 starts, what about you Margaret?