Page 1 of 1

van Berlo v Surjan

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:24 pm
by NFC
Now, who was it saying about this time last year that they would rather Surjan? :?

I bet they're feeling pretty stupid now. VB 40 possessions, only 22 years of age and has played 71 games including 50 on the trot. And well Surjan spent time at the Magpies this year and his disposal is average and he is too unaccountable to ever be a quality small defender.

VB by an absolute mile.

Re: van Berlo v Surjan

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:29 pm
by Dutchy
Hey NFC hit this - viewtopic.php?f=33&t=16879

:lol:

Re: van Berlo v Surjan

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:13 pm
by Hondo
I searched old posts to find which Port supporters were carrying on about Surgan .... but could only find this .... from one of our own! :shock: :D

Blue Boy wrote:Surjan is pretty hard at it and would be easily ahead of Van Berlo - IMO


I argued for VB last year and 12 months on I am more sure