by old moz » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:36 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:56 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by old moz » Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:37 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:00 pm
by Punk Rooster » Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:30 am
old moz wrote:punkrooster, i know it's far fetched but i was only looking at it from a "fair go" thing for the girls involved. our great game should embrace everyone who wants to have a go no matter what size ,shape and ability [and you would know, being involved in local footy, that is what you get at that level],or gender. if they are good enough they will earn their spot. i doubt if they would make it to "senior level" but if they did i'm sure they would've proven themselves many times over before a coach or club would take the "risk".
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by smac » Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:57 am
old moz wrote:punkrooster, i know it's far fetched but i was only looking at it from a "fair go" thing for the girls involved. our great game should embrace everyone who wants to have a go no matter what size ,shape and ability [and you would know, being involved in local footy, that is what you get at that level],or gender. if they are good enough they will earn their spot. i doubt if they would make it to "senior level" but if they did i'm sure they would've proven themselves many times over before a coach or club would take the "risk".
by The Big Shrek » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:47 pm
by Bubbula » Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:31 pm
old moz wrote:just when i thought you were turning our great game into a " girls " game [sorry girls just a footy expression ]. i see on the news tonight thatit is not the case. your organisation in its wisdom has decided that girls of a certain age cannot play against their male counterparts. what a load of rubbish. what of your "Women in Football" policy?, does it not apply to players of any age, or ability just to get out there and have a go if you want respect for women in football start looking at the junior level, not in your 'rarified' air of the "elite level" you will see that girls can compete as well as, and sometimes better than their male counerparts. why exclude these potential future players purely on gender? i admit the chances are low but sometimes a longshot gets up. maybe the Federal Govt Equalities person? should have alook at the setup that the AFL has in place. is it legal? is it fair? can they play at the top level? just give them the chance to go as far as they can
by Bubbula » Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:33 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:I remember Two Wells senior colts having a girl for a captain. The girls, their parents and the club know the risks, let them play. None of the AFL's business.
by The Big Shrek » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:07 pm
Bubbula wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:I remember Two Wells senior colts having a girl for a captain. The girls, their parents and the club know the risks, let them play. None of the AFL's business.
fairs fair Big Shrek. Its not like there being sexest. This rule is based on years of research in the football community. They are only looking out for the girls wellbeings. Personally I dont think they were much chop anyway.
by old moz » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:38 pm
by The Big Shrek » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:44 pm
by Dog_ger » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:50 pm
by rogernumber10 » Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:33 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Did they consider challenging the AFL's decision under the Sex Discrimination Act or an Equal Opportunity Act?
by Punk Rooster » Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:49 am
Does Mrs_Dog_ger know about this post?Dog_ger wrote:Oh Dear....
Women should be home doing the housework after completing 8 hours of work.
Making the man in their lives happy...![]()
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by The Big Shrek » Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:52 am
Punk Rooster wrote:Does Mrs_Dog_ger know about this post?Dog_ger wrote:Oh Dear....
Women should be home doing the housework after completing 8 hours of work.
Making the man in their lives happy...![]()
![]()
by Bubbula » Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:23 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Bubbula wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:I remember Two Wells senior colts having a girl for a captain. The girls, their parents and the club know the risks, let them play. None of the AFL's business.
fairs fair Big Shrek. Its not like there being sexest. This rule is based on years of research in the football community. They are only looking out for the girls wellbeings. Personally I dont think they were much chop anyway.
Can you point me in the direction of this voulme of research? Let the girls and their parents look after the girls' wellbeing.
by Bubbula » Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:25 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Did they consider challenging the AFL's decision under the Sex Discrimination Act or an Equal Opportunity Act?
by Bubbula » Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:26 pm
rogernumber10 wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Did they consider challenging the AFL's decision under the Sex Discrimination Act or an Equal Opportunity Act?
three separate court cases and counting.
by old moz » Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |