by Rik E Boy » Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:52 pm
by mick » Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:31 pm
by GWW » Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:56 pm
by Newman » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:18 pm
by Interceptor » Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:11 pm
Newman wrote:None so more evident than in Robert Walls commentary of the Power Roos Prelim on the weekend. His biased views on Port Adelaide was a disgrace. I always thought that being a national coverage commentators should stay neutral but the way he was talking that Port cannot beat Geelong not once but numerous times bought the telecast which was terrible to begin with to a all time low. I hope the power win even its just to stick it up walls backside.
by Pup » Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:30 pm
by smac » Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:32 pm
by devilsadvocate » Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:52 pm
Newman wrote:None so more evident than in Robert Walls commentary of the Power Roos Prelim on the weekend. His biased views on Port Adelaide was a disgrace. I always thought that being a national coverage commentators should stay neutral but the way he was talking that Port cannot beat Geelong not once but numerous times bought the telecast which was terrible to begin with to a all time low. I hope the power win even its just to stick it up walls backside.
by Strawb » Mon Sep 24, 2007 5:02 pm
by stan » Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:16 pm
Interceptor wrote:Newman wrote:None so more evident than in Robert Walls commentary of the Power Roos Prelim on the weekend. His biased views on Port Adelaide was a disgrace. I always thought that being a national coverage commentators should stay neutral but the way he was talking that Port cannot beat Geelong not once but numerous times bought the telecast which was terrible to begin with to a all time low. I hope the power win even its just to stick it up walls backside.
He's paid to offer his opinions, not to be boring and sit on the fence.
In his opinion Port are inferior to Geelong. Get over it.
by Psyber » Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:34 pm
Newman wrote:None so more evident than in Robert Walls commentary of the Power Roos Prelim on the weekend. His biased views on Port Adelaide was a disgrace. I always thought that being a national coverage commentators should stay neutral but the way he was talking that Port cannot beat Geelong not once but numerous times bought the telecast which was terrible to begin with to a all time low. I hope the power win even its just to stick it up walls backside.
by Mr66 » Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:35 pm
GWW wrote:According to the Victorian media, its HOW FAR: GEELONG.
Its just a case of state bias.
by Wedgie » Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:42 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Mr66 » Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:47 pm
Wedgie wrote:I got the Advertiser today and found I could only read about Port.
I got the Age and the Herald Sun also today and could read bout both Port and Geelong. Even had a VFL picture on the front page of the Herald Sun, I hope the Advertiser does the same after our Grand Final in the SANFL.
The state bias carp only goes so far, its not half as bad with the Victorians and you can always read about 16 clubs in their paper or hear about 16 clubs on their radio unlike here.
Both states are parochial but a hell of a lot of South Australians have a chip on their shoulder that the Victorians don't.
Robert Walls is a certified sit on the fence compared to some of the morons over here like Rucci.
I won't even bring up 5AA.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |