SA Footy

Just wondering, if anyone has heard the story that it is believed an AFL player has tested positive to drugs for a third time

The thread on that was removed from bigfooty, after they (allegedly) were contacted by someone from the (alleged) club.

At this point we will remove any posts that release details about this. We will have to wait for the AFL to make an official statement, and then it can be discussed.

Thanks

why

no names or players have been mentioned

Largely, Syd, because the AFL are extremely sensitive to media (particularly online) portrayal of the drugs issue in general.

To keep the legal hounds at bay, we have decided to just leave this issue entirely until an official announcement is made by the AFL or a club.

Given this site runs (in a financial sense) by the skin of its bum and (in a HR sense) by part-time volunteers, I'm sure all can understand our decision.

Thanks.

stan wrote:At this point we will remove any posts that release details about this. We will have to wait for the AFL to make an official statement, and then it can be discussed.

Thanks

On a similar issue elsewhere:

Other Forum wrote:Intersting story in the SMH ... http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/whirlpoo ... 78252.html http://www.smh.com.au wrote:
In a move that could set a nasty precedent for Australian website operators and their users, a software firm is suing a community website over comments published on its message board.

I am pretty sure that the company and forum involved in this story are not the first to have this type of legal issue raised

Other Forum wrote:Had a bit of a longer look at this today. Whirlpool have posted the statement of claim, http://tinyurl.com/33yyvn which includes all the comments which have led to the litigation. Makes for interesting reading, and it also means that the aggrieved company has ensured that the negative comments remain available for all to see.

Link: Lawsuit over forum comments withdrawn http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/lawsuit- ... 57140.html

Other Forum wrote:XXXXX sent a letter to Whirlpool last Thursday saying it had withdrawn all proceedings in the matter that was to have been heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland.

In the letter, obtained by smh.com.au, XXXXX accused its competitors of criticising its software on the Whirlpool forums while pretending to be customers. It did not name those competitors.

Other Forum wrote:But as of this morning, despite receiving notification of XXXXX's withdrawal last week, Whirlpool does not appear to have updated its users on the status of the case and is still accepting donations from them.

sydney-dog wrote:why

no names or players have been mentioned

Pretty much exactly what smac said.

If any of this is true I doubt the AFL will release any info until after the GF

CUTTERMAN wrote:If any of this is true I doubt the AFL will release any info until after the GF

The mail I got was it would be announced today (tues) after Brownlow Night

If so, will be interesting to see if its the same team that C7 announced before the AFL's injunction

Yes it will be Hondo. Hypothetically speaking, what if a player tested positive 3 times and was due to play finals or a GF, the AFL would have to announce it and ban the player, surely??? As I said b4, if this is true I don't see how they can't announce it immediately, I can understand why they aren't but surely it sets a precident, how long do they withhold information in the future, what about trade week if another club is looking at the player.
Assuming again this to be true it seems poorly handled.

waiting...... waiting.......waiting....... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

waiting................waiting......................waiting.............zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I reckon the announcement won't happen.

Havnt heard but one can be sure if he from Port it wont be questioned here by our media..

spiderblu wrote:Havnt heard but one can be sure if he from Port it wont be questioned here by our media..

dont u like port

Benchwarmer wrote:I reckon the announcement won't happen.

Meaning the player will disappear without a trace ?Face no penalty at all?Or the whole thing is garbage?

bulldogs wrote:

spiderblu wrote:Havnt heard but one can be sure if he from Port it wont be questioned here by our media..

dont u like port

Can you explain that comment bulldogs I get dont mean what you said

If its the same story as the one C7 showed that then got suppressed then from what I saw there is definitely something in it

WCE wouldn't be the only club parents would be warning their kids off ......

hondo71 wrote:If its the same story as the one C7 showed that then got suppressed then from what I saw there is definitely something in it

WCE wouldn't be the only club parents would be warning their kids off ......

Your wrong hondo WCE is the evil of the afl. They are the only team with problems and the only place in Australia that has drug issues. All the other places are clean and innocent......<insert sarcasim symbol here>