Page 1 of 7

Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:48 pm
by NFC
Tonight's result makes you wonder...

IMO yes they are, and by a fair way.

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:50 pm
by Dutchy
you dickhead

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:52 pm
by NFC
Dutchy wrote:you dickhead

I stand by my post.

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:53 pm
by Dutchy
so if the Hawks had won tonight you would have said the same thing?

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:54 pm
by sydney-dog
NFC

your comments are very short sighted

the Roo's prove that talent alone does not drive results, a team needs to be honest, work extremely hard for each other, play to the team rules and game plan 100%

when the Kanga's do this, they are a very difficult team to beat, and often beat teams that have more talent, but lower work ethic and levels of discipline

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:57 pm
by Hondo
That's a harsh call and a bit unnecessary probably

Ignoring that, I do have to say that the standard of 3 of the 4 finals so far this season (apart from the Cats) has been a tad alarming to me - this is when it is meant to move up a gear yet I've seen 3 fairly average standard games.

The 4 remaining teams are 8th and lower ranked teams from last season that would have to be one of the biggest turnarounds from 1 year to the next in history?

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:57 pm
by Mr66
'97,'98 Crows and '99 Carlton were worse.
STK in '05 not far behind the Roos

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:58 pm
by NFC
Dutchy wrote:so if the Hawks had won tonight you would have said the same thing?

The Hawks were the exact same story of the Bulldogs in 2006. Young team, unexpected win in the EF, only to come out flat the next week.

The Roos will not make the finals next year.

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:58 pm
by Hondo
Mr66 wrote:'97,'98 Crows


:shock: :shock: :shock:

Here we go ...... why did we ever start this it will end in tears?????

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:59 pm
by sydney-dog
Mr 66

so the crows must be the worse Premiers ever

this thread is shite

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:01 pm
by Dutchy
NFC wrote:
Dutchy wrote:so if the Hawks had won tonight you would have said the same thing?

The Hawks were the exact same story of the Bulldogs in 2006. Young team, unexpected win in the EF, only to come out flat the next week.

The Roos will not make the finals next year.


PM me and Ill have a sizeable bet on that with you....

BTW answer the question

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:01 pm
by NFC
sydney-dog wrote:Mr 66

so the crows must be the worse Premiers ever

this thread is shite

Hey, I made a truthful comment; don't knock the thread because of one fool. :wink:

Fact: Everyone is thinking along the lines of the thread title.

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:02 pm
by Hondo
sydney-dog wrote:this thread is shite


I'd be happy for a Mod to lock it up we are not going achieve anything

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:03 pm
by NFC
Dutchy wrote:
NFC wrote:
Dutchy wrote:so if the Hawks had won tonight you would have said the same thing?

The Hawks were the exact same story of the Bulldogs in 2006. Young team, unexpected win in the EF, only to come out flat the next week.

The Roos will not make the finals next year.


PM me and Ill have a sizeable bet on that with you....

BTW answer the question

I did. The Hawks are the better team who happened to have too many unfit players and being a young team came out so flat after the highs of last week.

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:04 pm
by Mr66
sydney-dog wrote:Mr 66

so the crows must be the worse Premiers ever
this thread is shite


Yep.
If 1 loss makes you a great premiership team (Ess 2000) then 9 (1997)
and 10(1998) makes you LUCKY.
Don't tell me that a team that loses 10 matches deserves to be called the best team
of the whole year. :roll:

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:05 pm
by NFC
hondo71 wrote:
sydney-dog wrote:this thread is shite


I'd be happy for a Mod to lock it up we are not going achieve anything

Oh yes, freedom of speech not allowed these days.

I think the Roos are a mediocre team with very few good players. Sure they work as a team but it’s a sad state when a team of ‘workers’ can win through to the Prelim.

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:06 pm
by NFC
Mr66 wrote:Don't tell me that a team that loses 10 matches deserves to be called the best team
of the whole year. :roll:

Using that logic, why not just give the premiership cup to the minor premier then?

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:06 pm
by sydney-dog
Hondo

what is alarming for me is this finals we are finally seeing the affect of the rule changes to our great game,

new interpertation to the out of bounds, hands in the back, holding the ball, other rules, not to mention the kick in's, have made the game quicker, removing a lot of the one on one contests.

this has had a huge impact on the traditional type of finals footy

personally, I am missing the hard ball contests, the game has become too technical, the whistle blows and the viewer / supporters have no idea which way it will go, especially marking and ruck contests

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:07 pm
by spell_check
The only reasoning behind North Melbourne being the worst PF team ever was last week, I'm guessing.

But three things:
Geelong at the moment look unbeatable - which is not necessarily true of course

Every team deserves the spot they play in because they earnt it - saying that they were lucky is crap

And basing comments like the Crows being the Worst Premiers ever is also crap - it's the whole team that wins matches, not superstar names. Malcolm Blight has said before along the lines that he thought that some players went missing come the 1992 Grand Final, and that's the main reason why they (Geelong) lost.

Teams win matches.

Re: Are the Roos the worst PF team ever?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:07 pm
by Dutchy
your arguement falls flat on the fact that Collingwood are in the PF also and have won less games thans the Roos with travelling outside Melbourne 4 times compared to the Roos 10....still waiting for the PM