by smac » Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:35 pm
by GWW » Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:46 pm
by heater31 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:54 pm
GWW wrote: Didak seems to be an obvious one, but maybe it could be a multi club trade with him back to SA to play with the Crows, apparently his preferred SA club.
by Punk Rooster » Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:57 pm
heater31 wrote:GWW wrote: Didak seems to be an obvious one, but maybe it could be a multi club trade with him back to SA to play with the Crows, apparently his preferred SA club.
I've heard Didak wants to come back to SA and play for the crows also
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Dogwatcher » Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:13 pm
by Blue Boy » Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:15 pm
by stan » Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:42 pm
Blue Boy wrote:That would be a huge story !!!
Is that why the Eagles are still playin him even though he is injured and never rested him !!!
by ORDoubleBlues » Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:57 pm
Blue Boy wrote:
Is that why the Eagles are still playin him even though he is injured and never rested him !!!
by Hondo » Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:00 pm
by blink » Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:55 pm
by Benchwarmer » Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:09 pm
by GWW » Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:05 pm
Benchwarmer wrote:Let's see ...
We have the following rumours:
* He has secretly signed for the Eagles long ago.
* He won't play at the Eagles if Cuz plays next year.
* He will try and move to Fremantle (guess which club's supporters started that ... delusional lot!).
* He won't play for most of next year so that he can rest his ailing body and ensure that his career extends beyond 30.
* He is going to Carlton for $1m per year.
* His gf has signed a deal with a Melbourne network so that a club can attribute a share of her (overstated) salary to ensure that he heads back to Victoria (no club named).
To be honest, I reckon he will stay put for at least one more contract. It's not as if the Eagles are struggling, are they? I am sure that West, Richardson, Fevola, Neitz and Lucas would like to be at a club dubbed "perennial finalists"!
It's a belief over here that they are only playing Judd because they are rolling their last dice. The next man in line may be good but Juddy at even two-thirds rat power can promise more than a "full tank" next option. The problem is that he is only about 30% right at the moment.
Even the most ardent Eagle fan will admit that the airfare they bought for Melbourne on GF weekend back in January will be for two non-WA sides.
This week is the sticking point with who progresses.
North will beat Hawthorn and I want the Eagles to beat the Colliwobbles - some say otherwise (better not happen).
Port will beat North and Geelong will beat Eagles (or the Colliwobbles)
A Geelong-Port GF will be the best option as we SHOULD get a 40-goal game with zip, flair, skill and pizazz ... we hope. At least the Swans cannot turn this one into a humdrum 9 goal to 8 affair.
Bring back the 40-goal, one goal margin GF!
Remember '89!
by sydney-dog » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:14 pm
by McAlmanac » Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:35 pm
sydney-dog wrote:On the GF, a ctas v hawks GF would be a ripper
by Mr66 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:39 pm
Benchwarmer wrote:A Geelong-Port GF will be the best option as we SHOULD get a 40-goal game with zip, flair, skill and pizazz ... we hope. At least the Swans cannot turn this one into a humdrum 9 goal to 8 affair.
Bring back the 40-goal, one goal margin GF!
Remember '89!
by rod_rooster » Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:56 pm
McAlmanac wrote:sydney-dog wrote:On the GF, a ctas v hawks GF would be a ripper
The only ripping would be the Hawks' new one....
by McAlmanac » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:11 am
rod_rooster wrote:McAlmanac wrote:sydney-dog wrote:On the GF, a ctas v hawks GF would be a ripper
The only ripping would be the Hawks' new one....
Of the 3 sides left that can play Geelong the Hawks would not be the worst chance. I'm sure they wouldn't lose by 106 points.
by rod_rooster » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:44 am
McAlmanac wrote:rod_rooster wrote:McAlmanac wrote:sydney-dog wrote:On the GF, a ctas v hawks GF would be a ripper
The only ripping would be the Hawks' new one....
Of the 3 sides left that can play Geelong the Hawks would not be the worst chance. I'm sure they wouldn't lose by 106 points.
As the other sides are 106 point losers Kangaroos and last-start-winners-over-Geelong Port, that is pretty obvious.
The Hawks are closer to the Kangaroos than they are to Port.
by stan » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:09 am
by Drop Bear » Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |