SA Footy

Both teams are on 14 points at the arse end of the table.
Is there anything for either team to play for???
Interesting to see who you've tipped, Melbourne look the strongest, but will the players just toss a coin, and head to the pub??

Yeah for Carlton...number one draft pick...That is something to "lose" for..
If Richmond somehow beat the Saints the loser of this game will get the spoon !

Would that explain the 3.20 offered on Carlton, or are they just so shit??

silicone skyline wrote:Would that explain the 3.20 offered on Carlton, or are they just so s***t??

Correct...the 3.20 bit that is, plus we are s##t...

So the bookies are betting Carlton deliberately lose, but would melbourne be looking to lose too?

silicone skyline wrote:So the bookies are betting Carlton deliberately lose, but would melbourne be looking to lose too?

I believe Melbourne are only on their first shit year, whereas Carlton are on their seoncd (unde the new priority pick rules). Will stand corrected on that though.

I think this is how it goes...
Carlton...If they win they will get pick 3 finish 14th. If they lose they will get pick 1 & 3.
Richmond...If they win they will get pick 2 finish 15th. If they lose they will get pick 2 finish 16th IF CARLTON LOSE. If Carlton win then they get pick 1.
Melbourne...If they win they will get pick 4 finish 14th. If they lose they will get pick 2 finish 15th. This assumes Richmond finish bottom. If Richmond WIN, and Carlton WIN then Melbourne will get pick 1 and finish 16th...

Carlton get Sticks cloned as they are in their 6th shit year ha ha. If they tank for four more years they'll clone Big Nick and draft him in. In the meantime the real Big Nick will lead the Blues rucks till the tank period ends...gotta be a better bet than Ackland ha ha.

regards,

REB

Only another 38 sh*t years REB and they get to match Geelongs record.

smithy wrote:Only another 38 sh*t years REB and they get to match Geelongs record.

GOLD !!


REB, If we could have a team of Sticks' I'd be in heaven ! Big Nic, now HE was a good ruckman !

smithy wrote:Only another 38 sh*t years REB and they get to match Geelongs record.

Did I miss something,has Geelongs run ended?

Booney wrote:

smithy wrote:Only another 38 sh*t years REB and they get to match Geelongs record.

Did I miss something,has Geelongs run ended?

Nah just the time since the last premiership...

it's crap wait till next year and the AFL will change the draft rules. It will make clubs play harder and not tank game because i find it F**ked that a club will lose for draft picks.

Strawb07 wrote:it's crap wait till next year and the AFL will change the draft rules. It will make clubs play harder and not tank game because i find it F**ked that a club will lose for draft picks.

What is F##ked is that this is the first year that the word "tank" has been used. Look back at the drafts in previous years i.e Collingwood & St Kilda when they had their lean runs. They both lost games, just like Carlton, yet no word was bandied around re tanking etc etc. The system has been abused since day one, and that is no fault of Carlton's, St Kilda's or Collingwood. It is the AFL at fault and no one else...

agreed SJABC and the AFL needs to do something about it because it will always be abused. I want to see my team fight and not win a spoon for draft picks the AFL needs some moral Fiber in the code.

Strawb07 wrote:agreed SJABC and the AFL needs to do something about it because it will always be abused. I want to see my team fight and not win a spoon for draft picks the AFL needs some moral Fiber in the code.

Winning the spoon seems to have lost the image in once had. Now its like got the spoon, bah who cares we got the number one pick.

My solution would be to scrap the priority pick altogether

Getting the no 1 draft pick is enough - no need to reward repeated mediocrity further

I don't think players tank on the day but possibly clubs deliberately don't name their best team / rest important players for next season. ie, the Administration's care factor about losing this year is lower and their minds are on next season - that's about as close to tanking as it gets.

The 22 guys that run out on the field would always give their 100% to win I reckon

hondo71 wrote:My solution would be to scrap the priority pick altogether

Getting the no 1 draft pick is enough - no need to reward repeated mediocrity further

I don't think players tank on the day but possibly clubs deliberately don't name their best team / rest important players for next season. ie, the Administration's care factor about losing this year is lower and their minds are on next season - that's about as close to tanking as it gets.

The 22 guys that run out on the field would always give their 100% to win I reckon

I tend to agree with that. I mean earlier in the week I heard that Carlton were going to rest Scottland due to general soreness. Last game of the season and they would consider that. Now please tell me thats flop. But if its not then yeah you are spot on. I have no doubt in my mind that the players give everything when they are out there and want to win. But the admin....thats a different story. At this stage the carlton admin would be happy, being competative without winning.

is this game on FTA or foxtel?

Perhaps the title of this thread should read 'something to not play for'