Gingernuts wrote:whufc wrote:Gingernuts wrote:whufc wrote:Dont think West Coast would let Hurn go unless he requests a trade.
West Coast see him as a future Captain and is already in the leadership group, highly valued player at WCE.
West Coast don't really need a ruckman at this stage either. I think a deal with Freo for Schammer would be a more likely win win deal for both parties.
would the Crows really want Schammer, has been in the system for many years now, is handy at best, lacks pace and isn't the most highly skilled player going around add to that he is very much one dimensinal, plays on the ball and thats about it really.
Best thing i can say about him is he wins his own ball.
Personally i wouldnt waste my time on Schammer
All your points are true, but I think given that all we have to offer is Griffin (who is also a handy at best player who's been in the system a few years), we can't be too choosy. Adelaide fans always seem to over-inflate the value of their discards at this time of the year - you can't expect to trade boiled lollies and get chocolate in return.
Schammer is definitely a bit of a punt, but I guess I am banking on his form improving with a return to his home state. I think he is an in and under player that would add some toughness, and could play as a small forward if necessary. We are not going to get any better type of player for Griffin I'm afraid, Hurn is no chance IMO.
could there be some kind of three way trade so the crows could end up with Angus Monfries. I personally think he would be alot better value than schammer and could go some way to replacing Knights if he leaves.
I guess then the crows could do a Monfries for Knights swap, i know the crows lose out there but your better of getting something for him than nothing.