Round 4 v Carlton

Talk on the national game

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Booney » Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:09 am

Regardless of results from here on in the real heat must be placed on Adelaide's list managment decisions at the end of 09.

The retention of McLeod ( who appears to be paving a way to injury free retirement ) Goodwin ( who tries as he always has but seems to be needed everywhere ) Burton ( who will have glimpses of brilliance, as he can ) Edwards ( who is now running on the spot )and Hentschel ( who must be admired for coming back from where he has but you cant pick guys on admiration alone ) seriously needs to be questioned.

As Connie says above. McLeod,Edwards,Goodwin and Burton gone at years end along with Doughty,Hentschel and you would think Griffen. That's at least 7 players and over 1200 games experience to be shed in the draft many people suspect will be the weakest in many years after the GC17 take who they want.

Last years decisions will put Adelaide back for another 5 years now IMO.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61654
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8201 times
Been liked: 11936 times

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Psyber » Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:29 am

Add to the above the fact that both Rutten and Bock seem to have recurring injuries.
And there must be more going on with Stevens than just the usual after effects of a concussion after this long - usually anything serious shows up quickly or the person is fine in a short time.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Punk Rooster » Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:13 am

Booney wrote:Regardless of results from here on in the real heat must be placed on Adelaide's list managment decisions at the end of 09.

The retention of McLeod ( who appears to be paving a way to injury free retirement ) Goodwin ( who tries as he always has but seems to be needed everywhere ) Burton ( who will have glimpses of brilliance, as he can ) Edwards ( who is now running on the spot )and Hentschel ( who must be admired for coming back from where he has but you cant pick guys on admiration alone ) seriously needs to be questioned.

As Connie says above. McLeod,Edwards,Goodwin and Burton gone at years end along with Doughty,Hentschel and you would think Griffen. That's at least 7 players and over 1200 games experience to be shed in the draft many people suspect will be the weakest in many years after the GC17 take who they want.

Last years decisions will put Adelaide back for another 5 years now IMO.

what type of impact will this (along with GC17) have on SANFL playing stocks?
Potentially, that could have an extra 40 of the states top footballing talent exiting, on top of what is normally drained...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Gingernuts » Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:30 am

Some great writing by Jesper Fjeldstad in the Sunday Mail today. Both is match report and his 'comment' on pg 46 (don't think they've put it online yet otherwise I'd post a link). Right on the money.
User avatar
Gingernuts
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:34 am

Gingernuts wrote:Some great writing by Jesper Fjeldstad in the Sunday Mail today. Both is match report and his 'comment' on pg 46 (don't think they've put it online yet otherwise I'd post a link). Right on the money.


You picked a bloody good year to go OS Gingernuts. You are now where my mob was back in 1999. ENJOY! ;)

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Gingernuts » Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:35 am

Rik E Boy wrote:
Gingernuts wrote:Some great writing by Jesper Fjeldstad in the Sunday Mail today. Both is match report and his 'comment' on pg 46 (don't think they've put it online yet otherwise I'd post a link). Right on the money.


You picked a bloody good year to go OS Gingernuts. You are now where my mob was back in 1999. ENJOY! ;)

regards,

REB


I know. To think I was worried that I'd be missing some decent footy. Pfft.
User avatar
Gingernuts
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:40 am

I don't think you controlled as much of yesterday's game as you think. The latter part of the first quarter and about half of the last. The third quarter was shocking by both sides. You are in trouble if you make Carlton look good because they are shithouse.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Gingernuts » Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:44 am

Rik E Boy wrote:I don't think you controlled as much of yesterday's game as you think. The latter part of the first quarter and about half of the last. The third quarter was shocking by both sides. You are in trouble if you make Carlton look good because they are shithouse.

regards,

REB


True, but my point was more that if we actually would've kicked straight we could've built some momentum from those periods, what we ended up with was zero return for effort. Already low confidence sinks even lower = result we ended up with.
User avatar
Gingernuts
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Whitelinefever » Sun Apr 18, 2010 11:01 am

Regarding comments regarding Petrenko being a gutsy player,not wanting to be too hard on the guy,but if anyone watched Dangerfield getting crunched by 3 demons last week,watch his effort again,He got tackled by 2 ,Petrenko sat 2 metres away sitting there like a stunned mullet,and watched the 3rd come in and really sink him down.
just sat there like a stunned mullet,let Dangerfield get poleaxed,and alsoRiley sat there and watched as well.
No sheperd,no help for their mate,no reminstration...nothing.
Its all well and good learning how to cover a zone,run like the wind,get heart rate monitors strappen on and gps ect that say you covered 16ks,big deal,how about down crowland they get back to doing the hard things like protecting your team mates being fierce at the contest,these things are non existent at the moment and seem to be a fair bit of the problem.
I watched the 1985 grand final on footy flashbacks this morning and it made the garbage witnessed crows/carlton look like nancy garbage,sure enough it wasnt as quick ect,but the hard basics were there which was actually entertainig in itself. :roll:
User avatar
Whitelinefever
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby NFC » Sun Apr 18, 2010 4:50 pm

Felch wrote:Plenty of flack is being copped by Burton, Tippett, and Walker up forward, but IMO one of the biggest let-downs has been Porplyzia. He looks slow and dis-interested. Knights been terrible too, but is obviously under-done.

Maric and Mackay our best 2 players the last fortnight, and Goodwin has showed that he will still put his body in harms way - unlike a certain other bloke of a similar vintage.

Knights was one of our best yesterday. :?
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Felch » Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:11 pm

NFC wrote:
Felch wrote:Plenty of flack is being copped by Burton, Tippett, and Walker up forward, but IMO one of the biggest let-downs has been Porplyzia. He looks slow and dis-interested. Knights been terrible too, but is obviously under-done.

Maric and Mackay our best 2 players the last fortnight, and Goodwin has showed that he will still put his body in harms way - unlike a certain other bloke of a similar vintage.

Knights was one of our best yesterday. :?


When it was all over. He fumbled and looked out-of-sorts when the heat was on. As i said though, he is underdone.
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby White Line Fever » Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:54 pm

I'm seriously thinking about jumping onboard the Gold Coast ~x(
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby The Dark Knight » Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:55 pm

tiger07andbeyond wrote:I would send Walker back to Norwood, he riminds me of that Mark Williams from Essendon.... a complete show pony


Yep good call, he hasn't done anything this year. But if he goes back to norwood he'll kick a bag and then come back up and continue to do nothing. so the crows should let him stay in the sanfl for a while and let him gain some form and confidence and then when he's ready bring him back.
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
 
Posts: 35664
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 pm
Location: Gotham City
Has liked: 11825 times
Been liked: 1670 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby Psyber » Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:54 am

The Dark Knight wrote:
tiger07andbeyond wrote:I would send Walker back to Norwood, he riminds me of that Mark Williams from Essendon.... a complete show pony
Yep good call, he hasn't done anything this year. But if he goes back to norwood he'll kick a bag and then come back up and continue to do nothing. so the crows should let him stay in the sanfl for a while and let him gain some form and confidence and then when he's ready bring him back.
Watching him, on TV admittedly, I get the impression he is used to being the go to player and waits for it to happen, and is also not used to having to give it off and hesitates too long.
He has potential, but has a lot to learn at this level, and I suspect is not yet earning his place.
But I think he'll stay in because of the injury list.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Round 4 v Carlton

Postby JK » Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:27 pm

Psyber wrote:
The Dark Knight wrote:
tiger07andbeyond wrote:I would send Walker back to Norwood, he riminds me of that Mark Williams from Essendon.... a complete show pony
Yep good call, he hasn't done anything this year. But if he goes back to norwood he'll kick a bag and then come back up and continue to do nothing. so the crows should let him stay in the sanfl for a while and let him gain some form and confidence and then when he's ready bring him back.
Watching him, on TV admittedly, I get the impression he is used to being the go to player and waits for it to happen, and is also not used to having to give it off and hesitates too long.
He has potential, but has a lot to learn at this level, and I suspect is not yet earning his place.
But I think he'll stay in because of the injury list.


Walker is clearly not adjusting to the AFL system in the timeframe that would have been hoped for ... He looks slow, limited in gut running, struggles to take a contested mark and not judging the pace of the game - No doubt his confidence would be well down like many Crows and that's always a barrier on output.

I think IF he's to make it at this level (and that is still a big if at this stage), given the development he's had to undertake and still has to undertake, his best is a couple of years away still, and dependent upon his role.

I can really only see him having a chance to succeed if he's used primarily between the goalsquare and 70 metres out, but to pay your way in a role like that you would need an output that's Fevola-like in this day and age of required versatility.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Previous

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |