(I just wish we could WIN one of these close matches

by FD88 » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:17 pm
by JK » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:23 pm
Booney wrote:More so,if Johnson was playing in the middle,sure,give Shirley the job to stop him,but Johnson playing out of the goal square? Kicks the 'Dogs last 3 goals.Really Craigy,it is moves like that which give the critics ammo.
by Westsider » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:26 pm
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:Just think, if the Crows had Huddo and Torney they probably would have won that game comfortably.
Add a few goals from Welsh,and take Shirley off Johnson,they win!
More so,if Johnson was playing in the middle,sure,give Shirley the job to stop him,but Johnson playing out of the goal square? Kicks the 'Dogs last 3 goals.Really Craigy,it is moves like that which give the critics ammo.
by JK » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:30 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:33 pm
FD88 wrote: the Crows are possibly the most competitive unit in the AFL.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by BUZZ » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:37 pm
Wedgie wrote:FD88 wrote: the Crows are possibly the most competitive unit in the AFL.
I would have thought Geelong had been fairly competitive in the last 12 months.
by GWW » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Wedgie wrote:FD88 wrote: the Crows are possibly the most competitive unit in the AFL.
I would have thought Geelong had been fairly competitive in the last 12 months.
by Wedgie » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:44 pm
GWW wrote:Wedgie wrote:FD88 wrote: the Crows are possibly the most competitive unit in the AFL.
I would have thought Geelong had been fairly competitive in the last 12 months.
I presume FD88 is saying that the Crows do more with their squad than what names on paper would indicate they should ie. playing above themselves, compared to Geelong who are clearly the best team in the league.
Not saying i agree with this, but i presume this is what is meant.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by BUZZ » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:44 pm
GWW wrote:Wedgie wrote:FD88 wrote: the Crows are possibly the most competitive unit in the AFL.
I would have thought Geelong had been fairly competitive in the last 12 months.
I presume FD88 is saying that the Crows do more with their squad than what names on paper would indicate they should ie. playing above themselves, compared to Geelong who are clearly the best team in the league.
Not saying i agree with this, but i presume this is what is meant.
by Westsider » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:53 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:04 pm
Westsider wrote:Isn't this 2008? And a crows vs bullsdogs thread?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by the joker » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:11 pm
i think the comment is meant to be taken over the last few years. if you remember back to 06 Geelong had a few hefty losses. to teams like the hawks twice , collingwood and adelaide. and the crows have only had two losses over 5 goals since the start of the 05 season i thinkWedgie wrote:GWW wrote:Wedgie wrote:FD88 wrote: the Crows are possibly the most competitive unit in the AFL.
I would have thought Geelong had been fairly competitive in the last 12 months.
I presume FD88 is saying that the Crows do more with their squad than what names on paper would indicate they should ie. playing above themselves, compared to Geelong who are clearly the best team in the league.
Not saying i agree with this, but i presume this is what is meant.
I would have thought that winning a Grand Final by a record margin of nearly 20 goals that Geelong wouldn't have done a bad job?
Or is a Crows minor round loss equivilent to a Geelong premiership win by 20 goals "competitively"?
Geelong were about 16/1 to win the premiership last year and odds on them having the season they had (with all australians, vfl win, etc) would have been about 500/1. Surely that's playing above yourself a bit better than a team that's always around the middle of the ladder?
Stupid, absolutely stupid but I'd expect nothing less from Rowe. If anything Port are a hell of a lot more competitive and played above themselves in 2007.
Anyway, good luck to the Crows, hopefully young players like McLeod, Edwards and Goodwin can improve as they get older and help the Crows look a bit better on paper. Perhaps one day they'll get the money and facilities that North Melbourne, the Bulldogs, etc get to train with that they'd be so envious of and start to over perform.
by Rushby Hinds » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:13 pm
by Blue Boy » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:19 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:24 pm
Blue Boy wrote:All summer I was waiting and it only took till the first round Shirley in the back pocket with 300 game player Johnson - enough said Mummbles
by Blue Boy » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:35 pm
Rushby Hinds wrote:Blue Boy wrote:All summer I was waiting and it only took till the first round Shirley in the back pocket with 300 game player Johnson - enough said Mummbles
But who was the wag who compared Nathan Bock to Simon Feast?
by Dutchy » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:03 pm
by Mickyj » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:11 pm
Dutchy wrote:Shirley you cant be serious, here is no Doughty there are some players just not up to AFL in the Cows team....
by Dutchy » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:19 pm
Mickyj wrote:Dutchy wrote:Shirley you cant be serious, here is no Doughty there are some players just not up to AFL in the Cows team....
So Dutchy next week when the Eagles play North are you saying Shirley will line up in Eagles colours then ?
by Dirko » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:44 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |