by sydney-dog » Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:20 pm
by redden whites » Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:40 pm
by sydney-dog » Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:55 pm
by sydney-dog » Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:21 am
by am Bays » Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:47 am
by Hondo » Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:51 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:SD difference between Nathan Brown and JAson Torney is that one retired before the end of teh season the other was delisted.
by Blue Boy » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:33 am
sydney-dog wrote:Jason Torney gets delisted, people fire shots and acuse the club as having "No Idea"
however
Nathan Brown also gets delisted after finishes in Melbourne's top 10 in the B&F, and not an eyebrow is raised
both players play HB, both Players finished top 10 in 2007 B&F, both players past 30, both clubs make a decision to move forward by providing young players more scope... however, one club continues to be criticised for the decision
it is time to move on, these hard decisions will continue to be made by all clubs
by Blue Boy » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:34 am
hondo71 wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:SD difference between Nathan Brown and JAson Torney is that one retired before the end of teh season the other was delisted.
Nathan was interviewed on 5AA last night and altho he put a positive spin on it I got the impression it wasn't his choice to stop playing AFL (he said things like 'I can't complain I played 10 years of AFL', etc).
Sounded like new coach, new broom
Maybe it was just my read of it tho ....
by Hondo » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:42 am
Blue Boy wrote:Hey Hondo
I rekon it was your read on it !!!
by JK » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:52 am
Blue Boy wrote:hondo71 wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:SD difference between Nathan Brown and JAson Torney is that one retired before the end of teh season the other was delisted.
Nathan was interviewed on 5AA last night and altho he put a positive spin on it I got the impression it wasn't his choice to stop playing AFL (he said things like 'I can't complain I played 10 years of AFL', etc).
Sounded like new coach, new broom
Maybe it was just my read of it tho ....
Hey Hondo
I rekon it was your read on it !!!
by finn » Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:50 pm
hondo71 wrote:Agree on Bock at CHB too
I have heard Craigy interviewed on Bock and he thinks Bock can develop into one of the elite CHB's in the league so looks like the coach agrees!
by 1Eyed » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:29 pm
by footy_pie » Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:03 pm
GWW wrote:NFC wrote:stan wrote:NFC wrote:Pfeiffer invited to train with the Tigers.
Good stuff Crows.
They'll probably get take him as well. Pfeiffer has a bit to offer in my opinion.
Mate Pfeiffer will be a quality player. He has the athletic ability as well as all the tools to be successful.
Its his off field issues he needs to deal with though. If he can improve that side of things, no reason why he cant make it at another club. Not sure Richmond would be the best side for him to go to though.
by Psyber » Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:18 pm
GWW wrote:NFC wrote: Its his off field issues he needs to deal with though. If he can improve that side of things, no reason why he cant make it at another club. Not sure Richmond would be the best side for him to go to though.
I think Pfeiffer would fit in quite well at Norwood, would be playing along side a good mate, which might be just the thing he needs to pull his head in. The kid has a lot of talent.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |