by Booney » Wed Oct 16, 2024 9:29 am
by am Bays » Wed Oct 16, 2024 9:31 am
Booney wrote:We've lost Houston and next years first round pick.
With lots of academy and f/son picks next year in a weaker draft it's likely that pick would be in the late teens perhaps early 20's and as such wouldn't be valued too highly. If the 2025 draft is weak and compromised and 2027 will see the first of Tasmania's picks we've got this year and 2026 to get some youth into the club.
With Lukosius and Richards coming in, two players we were after along with 13, 29, 36 and 50 when we only had 39 and 58 is sound list management.
We'll turn 36 and 50 into something in the 20's and where we had nothing inside 30 we'll have 3. This years draft from 10-30 is rated highly and very even meaning we're every chance to get someone we really want.
Cut back the layers and we've played the longer game. Be stronger with Houston in 2025 and compromise the list going forward to keep moving.
by whufc » Wed Oct 16, 2024 9:39 am
by wenchbarwer » Wed Oct 16, 2024 9:45 am
Jim05 wrote:I think you will keep 50 to use on Benny if a bid comes in around the 40 mark for himBooney wrote:We've lost Houston and next years first round pick.
With lots of academy and f/son picks next year in a weaker draft it's likely that pick would be in the late teens perhaps early 20's and as such wouldn't be valued too highly. If the 2025 draft is weak and compromised and 2027 will see the first of Tasmania's picks we've got this year and 2026 to get some youth into the club.
With Lukosius and Richards coming in, two players we were after along with 13, 29, 36 and 50 when we only had 39 and 58 is sound list management.
We'll turn 36 and 50 into something in the 20's and where we had nothing inside 30 we'll have 3. This years draft from 10-30 is rated highly and very even meaning we're every chance to get someone we really want.
Cut back the layers and we've played the longer game. Be stronger with Houston in 2025 and compromise the list going forward to keep moving.
by am Bays » Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:07 am
whufc wrote:Help me understand.
Why would a team trade a top 30 pick for 36 and 50???
A top 30 pick in a deep draft could be pretty decent, at 36 and 50 realistically it's just diamonds in the rough type stuff.
I dont understand the points scenario, but could that be at play.
by Bob Loblaw » Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:10 am
whufc wrote:Help me understand.
Why would a team trade a top 30 pick for 36 and 50???
A top 30 pick in a deep draft could be pretty decent, at 36 and 50 realistically it's just diamonds in the rough type stuff.
I dont understand the points scenario, but could that be at play.
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:19 am
I wouldn’t be surprised if he was bid on so I don’t think he will get to the rookie draftwenchbarwer wrote:Jim05 wrote:I think you will keep 50 to use on Benny if a bid comes in around the 40 mark for himBooney wrote:We've lost Houston and next years first round pick.
With lots of academy and f/son picks next year in a weaker draft it's likely that pick would be in the late teens perhaps early 20's and as such wouldn't be valued too highly. If the 2025 draft is weak and compromised and 2027 will see the first of Tasmania's picks we've got this year and 2026 to get some youth into the club.
With Lukosius and Richards coming in, two players we were after along with 13, 29, 36 and 50 when we only had 39 and 58 is sound list management.
We'll turn 36 and 50 into something in the 20's and where we had nothing inside 30 we'll have 3. This years draft from 10-30 is rated highly and very even meaning we're every chance to get someone we really want.
Cut back the layers and we've played the longer game. Be stronger with Houston in 2025 and compromise the list going forward to keep moving.
Benny Barrett? I reckon they'd be able to rookie list him
by wenchbarwer » Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:25 am
Jim05 wrote:I wouldn’t be surprised if he was bid on so I don’t think he will get to the rookie draftwenchbarwer wrote:Jim05 wrote:I think you will keep 50 to use on Benny if a bid comes in around the 40 mark for himBooney wrote:We've lost Houston and next years first round pick.
With lots of academy and f/son picks next year in a weaker draft it's likely that pick would be in the late teens perhaps early 20's and as such wouldn't be valued too highly. If the 2025 draft is weak and compromised and 2027 will see the first of Tasmania's picks we've got this year and 2026 to get some youth into the club.
With Lukosius and Richards coming in, two players we were after along with 13, 29, 36 and 50 when we only had 39 and 58 is sound list management.
We'll turn 36 and 50 into something in the 20's and where we had nothing inside 30 we'll have 3. This years draft from 10-30 is rated highly and very even meaning we're every chance to get someone we really want.
Cut back the layers and we've played the longer game. Be stronger with Houston in 2025 and compromise the list going forward to keep moving.
Benny Barrett? I reckon they'd be able to rookie list him
by bertiebeatle1 » Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:45 am
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:05 am
wenchbarwer wrote:
I've seen a bit of Barrett over the years, and he looks like he peaked at 16 and has plateaued since then. Happy to be proven wrong though.
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:08 am
Booney wrote:Richmond now have 1, 10,11,18, 20, 24, 51, 61, 70, 76
And will add 6 and 23 for Rioli.
by mal » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:16 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:35 am
Booney wrote:Richmond now have 1, 10,11,18, 20, 24, 51, 61, 70, 76
And will add 6 and 23 for Rioli.
by wenchbarwer » Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:58 am
Dutchy wrote:wenchbarwer wrote:
I've seen a bit of Barrett over the years, and he looks like he peaked at 16 and has plateaued since then. Happy to be proven wrong though.
He still has plenty of upside, didn't really show much until he was 14ish. Did a hamstring just before the state champs this year which is why he wasn't on show, he is small but has some AFL attributes - his speed and agility is elite.
IMO he is the best FS/NGA prospect Port have.
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 16, 2024 12:09 pm
wenchbarwer wrote:Dutchy wrote:wenchbarwer wrote:
I've seen a bit of Barrett over the years, and he looks like he peaked at 16 and has plateaued since then. Happy to be proven wrong though.
He still has plenty of upside, didn't really show much until he was 14ish. Did a hamstring just before the state champs this year which is why he wasn't on show, he is small but has some AFL attributes - his speed and agility is elite.
IMO he is the best FS/NGA prospect Port have.
As in the current crop for 2024? If so, it's a very shallow pool, more so a damp spot on the concrete
He fell off a bit in 2023, some of the SANFL U18 games I saw he was barely involved.
by wenchbarwer » Wed Oct 16, 2024 12:17 pm
Dutchy wrote:Correct, played Reserves late in the year.
by Armchair expert » Wed Oct 16, 2024 2:06 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 16, 2024 3:09 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Richmond will be destroyed for 20 years if this years draft crop is a total flop
by heater31 » Wed Oct 16, 2024 3:56 pm
Well they at least played finals.......wenchbarwer wrote:Dutchy wrote:Correct, played Reserves late in the year.
I wouldn't be telling too many people about playing ressies at Souf in 2024! [emoji38] [emoji38]
by amber_fluid » Wed Oct 16, 2024 4:07 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Richmond will be destroyed for 20 years if this years draft crop is a total flop
And they will still be more successful over a 30 year period than most clubs.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |