LBT wrote:pafc1870 wrote:sydney-dog wrote:Macca19
I would argue that the first qtr was an even contest
Ebert's first goal was a disgraceful decision, it was wet Mattner slid to gather the footy, was pounced upon immediately, holding the ball was paid....
On a wet evening this would of happpend more than 50 times, and they pay about 4 holding the ball's all night
Then, their was Burton's mark, he would need to of had 5 foot long arms for it to be a push in the back, once again cost a goal
The scoreboard flattered the Power at qtr time
The Burton incident, shouldn't have been a free kick, but also wasn't a mark. Actually gotta do more than make contact with the ball to be a mark. He held on to it for a total of 0.5 seconds in three attempts.
Gary Ablett.."Mark of the century thread"
i thought Stephen Smiths mark at the Gabba in 96 was Mark of the Century....???