smac wrote:Obviously as a result of the keen response on SAFooty.
Stokes got it back out of pawn.

by Booney » Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:29 pm
smac wrote:Obviously as a result of the keen response on SAFooty.
by Wedgie » Mon Jan 23, 2012 5:49 pm
the joker wrote:Selwood has won a lot of games in his first few years. Geelong will probably be alright still this year. But after that selwood is going to have a few hard years of a struggling side
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Strawb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:29 am
by Booney » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:39 am
by Strawb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:42 am
Booney wrote:AFL Premiers 1937 and 1951-52....hmmm, interesting.
by Booney » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:54 am
Strawb wrote:Booney wrote:AFL Premiers 1937 and 1951-52....hmmm, interesting.
All Club premierships in the VFL count towards AFL premierships. Also I choose to list all Geelong Premierships Like on my Bruins Tattoo I have all Stanley Cup Championships.
by Strawb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:57 am
Booney wrote:Strawb wrote:Booney wrote:AFL Premiers 1937 and 1951-52....hmmm, interesting.
All Club premierships in the VFL count towards AFL premierships. Also I choose to list all Geelong Premierships Like on my Bruins Tattoo I have all Stanley Cup Championships.
But not SANFL Premierships.....oh well. Double standards.
by Psyber » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:59 am
by Strawb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:02 am
Psyber wrote:As far as I am concerned there was no "AFL" prior to interstate clubs joining..
The rest is just Victorian arrogance and propaganda.
by Psyber » Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:10 am
Sounds good to me.Strawb wrote:Psyber wrote:As far as I am concerned there was no "AFL" prior to interstate clubs joining..
The rest is just Victorian arrogance and propaganda.
Without the VFL going broke there would be no AFL. So there would be No Power, Crows, No VFL teams really.
by Strawb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:13 am
Psyber wrote:Sounds good to me.Strawb wrote:Psyber wrote:As far as I am concerned there was no "AFL" prior to interstate clubs joining..
The rest is just Victorian arrogance and propaganda.
Without the VFL going broke there would be no AFL. So there would be No Power, Crows, No VFL teams really.
Then SA and WA may have been able to broker a genuine national competition not run by Melbourne.
As it stands even Geelong are barely tolerated because they are not quite a Melbourne team - the media always promote St Kilda or the Bulldogs instead.
by Dirko » Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:37 am
Booney wrote:But not SANFL Premierships.....oh well. Double standards.
by Strawb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:09 pm
SJABC wrote:Booney wrote:But not SANFL Premierships.....oh well. Double standards.
![]()
So using your view point that'll mean North Melbourne or Essendon or Geelong could include the VFA premierships as well....
by Media Park » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:36 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Strawb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:39 pm
Media Park wrote:I think we can play that game, AFL started in 1990:
Collingwood x 2
Hawthorn x 2
West Coast x 3
Essendon x 2
Carlton x 1
North x 2
Adelaide x 2
Brisbane x 3
Port x 1
Sydney x 1
Geelong x 3
West Coast, Brisbane and Geelong rock then...
by Hondo » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:42 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:58 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Strawb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:00 pm
Wedgie wrote:Keep on track please, this topic is about Geelong's 2012 season, not about a competition that simply changed its name in 1990.
Cheers.
by RustyCage » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:23 am
Psyber wrote:As far as I am concerned there was no "AFL" prior to interstate clubs joining..
The rest is just Victorian arrogance and propaganda.
by Mr Beefy » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:19 am
Wedgie wrote:Keep on track please, this topic is about Geelong's 2012 season, not about a competition that simply changed its name in 1990.
Cheers.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |