by Barto » Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:01 am
by NFC » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:28 pm
OnSong wrote:NFC wrote:They have some of the best young kids in the comp, and I was saying that last year.
Hill will be a top 10 AFL player IF he continues to work hard and develop.
Hill, Suban, Morabito, Broughton, Ballantyne (both a bit older), Mayne, Clarke and PALMER! They've got some rippers!
Alex Silvagni looks the goods too.
Don't think Suban will make it, and they need to delist Ryan Crowley.
Other than that, looks OK.
by NFC » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:09 pm
by Voice » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:31 pm
NFC wrote:SUBAN.![]()
![]()
Freo on the other hand, magnificent win. Stephen Hill will win a Brownlow.
by Barto » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:38 pm
by NFC » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:46 pm
by Mop Up » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:47 pm
by mal » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:49 pm
by the wonder elephant » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:49 pm
by the wonder elephant » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:56 pm
mal wrote:2.08 on the clock left
SUBAN writhing in agony over the wing boundary
A stretcher is required
And this happened
FR player takes the free kick
no stretcher yet
He kicks it out on the full
no stretcher yet
44 for GE kicks across ground to Steve Johnson in the back pocket
AS 44 kicks it the stretcher comes on to the field
Johnson kicks it to half back where a team mate gains possesion, and would have turned and kicked it perhaps to the wing or whatever
The game is stopped for the stretcher
The ball is to be rekicked by Johnson
Suban is carried off
Eventually Johnson kicks to where FR have zoned off, FR than gain possession and scored 1-3 to 0-1 in the last 2 minutes and 8 seconds of play
The rule is as I believe
as soon as the stretcher comes on, the next break in play the game is stopped
Common sense should have been hold the game up and get the stretcher on b4 the FR free kick was taken on the wing
Instead it was done when GE had the flow , and this severley diisadvantaged GE
QUESTION
Could there be collusion ?
That FR player takes the free kick AND :
A FR player had marked and a team mate was free up field
Would the FR stretcher been delayed ....
Would not happen if the game was stopped in the first place
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:37 pm
by gadj1976 » Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:38 pm
by MatteeG » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:04 pm
NFC wrote:Not sure how that is, his knee was trapped underneath.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by BZB27 » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:33 pm
by Voice » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:39 am
mal wrote:2.08 on the clock left
SUBAN writhing in agony over the wing boundary
A stretcher is required
And this happened
FR player takes the free kick
no stretcher yet
He kicks it out on the full
no stretcher yet
44 for GE kicks across ground to Steve Johnson in the back pocket
AS 44 kicks it the stretcher comes on to the field
Johnson kicks it to half back where a team mate gains possesion, and would have turned and kicked it perhaps to the wing or whatever
The game is stopped for the stretcher
The ball is to be rekicked by Johnson
Suban is carried off
Eventually Johnson kicks to where FR have zoned off, FR than gain possession and scored 1-3 to 0-1 in the last 2 minutes and 8 seconds of play
The rule is as I believe
as soon as the stretcher comes on, the next break in play the game is stopped
Common sense should have been hold the game up and get the stretcher on b4 the FR free kick was taken on the wing
Instead it was done when GE had the flow , and this severley diisadvantaged GE
QUESTION
Could there be collusion ?
That FR player takes the free kick AND :
A FR player had marked and a team mate was free up field
Would the FR stretcher been delayed ....
Would not happen if the game was stopped in the first place
by Voice » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:42 am
CK wrote:Honestly hard to make a case for anything above bottom four. Simply, far too much rests upon Pavlich and Sandilands, and to a lesser extent, McPharlin (being thrown to either end of the ground each game). May pinch the odd MCG game, where they seem to play okay at times, but not enough away wins in them.
Also need to really re-assess the policy of luring ex-Essendon players across. A couple have been good, others questionable. Jury will be out on McPhee for a while though, he may well be an exception in his second stint there.
by Voice » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:45 am
Barto wrote:stan wrote:Any talk about Chris Mayne this season.
Saw Chris last Saturday, fit and raring to go. Rhys Palmer returns in 4-5 weeks.
Top 4
by Voice » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:56 am
Booney wrote:Barto wrote:overloaded wrote:While everyone has been laughing at Freo..... we have been winning premierships. Theres a little difference I reckon![]()
You make it sound like you've won everything. Why the plural?
If you're going to talk about the butt of jokes, I'd like to remind you about 2007 which you seem to have forgotten.
I have a theory of why Port fans are quick to jump onto anything about Freo, they're probably jealous that a club that has won nothing is more marketable, has more supporters, is financially viable and not begging to merge with one of the WAFL teams.
Haha, your intense hatred of Port Adelaide makes your mind play tricks with itself, doesn't it?![]()
Why would Port Adelaide be jealous of Fremantle? Two clubs had to merge to create the Dockers, they have won nothing, have no real identity ( you will argue neither do we, but by arguing about it you at least acknowledge we do have one ) and are the butt of many jokes. Sure, we lost a GF by 119 points but Im sure the purple people in Perth would kill for the chance to even get there. We have been regular finalists and have won day and night Premierships.
I didnt think you liked the AFL anyway?
by Rik E Boy » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:24 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:32 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |