by JK » Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:55 am
by Blue Boy » Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:57 am
finn wrote:i get nervous when i hear craig talking about moran as a long term chb becuase that to me means that bock will be played forward when his natural position is chb.
no problem with the delistings but i'd keep on eye on pfeiffer and if he's better than anything at #59 redraft him.
however, going down a youth path and keeping honest triers like doughty seems a tad silly. seems like torney lost out to adelaide's 30 yo rule however.
have a feeling that 2008 could bbe make or break year for craig with regards to longetivity - he may have to release the handbrake a bit or face the same thing that happened at norwood where the intense defensive aspects overrode the innate pleasure of playing footer.
by Shirtfront » Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:06 pm
Blue Boy wrote:finn wrote:i get nervous when i hear craig talking about moran as a long term chb becuase that to me means that bock will be played forward when his natural position is chb.
no problem with the delistings but i'd keep on eye on pfeiffer and if he's better than anything at #59 redraft him.
however, going down a youth path and keeping honest triers like doughty seems a tad silly. seems like torney lost out to adelaide's 30 yo rule however.
have a feeling that 2008 could bbe make or break year for craig with regards to longetivity - he may have to release the handbrake a bit or face the same thing that happened at norwood where the intense defensive aspects overrode the innate pleasure of playing footer.
You are on the money with Bock @ CHB - he has his best games there and we seem to look more attacking when he is there !!!
by NFC » Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:20 pm
finn wrote:i get nervous when i hear craig talking about moran as a long term chb becuase that to me means that bock will be played forward when his natural position is chb.
by Hondo » Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:07 pm
by Sojourner » Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:38 pm
by Booney » Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:48 pm
by am Bays » Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:09 pm
Booney wrote:So Craig and his cohorts have come to the conclusion the list is tired and needs freshening up.2 years too late IMHO,while the core group of 2006 was flying,the players who were not able to force their way into selection calculation then have been so far behind in their development its too late for them.Even when going well,Brisbane,WCE,Sydney and Port gave younger players some time to develop.Craigs reliance on 24-5 players has been to the detriment of the rest of the list.IMO anyway.
All good news.
by NFC » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:38 pm
by stan » Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:56 pm
NFC wrote:Pfeiffer invited to train with the Tigers.
Good stuff Crows.
by NFC » Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:49 pm
stan wrote:NFC wrote:Pfeiffer invited to train with the Tigers.
Good stuff Crows.
They'll probably get take him as well. Pfeiffer has a bit to offer in my opinion.
by GWW » Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:01 pm
NFC wrote:stan wrote:NFC wrote:Pfeiffer invited to train with the Tigers.
Good stuff Crows.
They'll probably get take him as well. Pfeiffer has a bit to offer in my opinion.
Mate Pfeiffer will be a quality player. He has the athletic ability as well as all the tools to be successful.
by Psyber » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:45 pm
GWW wrote:NFC wrote:stan wrote:NFC wrote:Pfeiffer invited to train with the Tigers.
Good stuff Crows.
They'll probably get take him as well. Pfeiffer has a bit to offer in my opinion.
Mate Pfeiffer will be a quality player. He has the athletic ability as well as all the tools to be successful.
Its his off field issues he needs to deal with though. If he can improve that side of things, no reason why he cant make it at another club. Not sure Richmond would be the best side for him to go to though.
by heater31 » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:51 pm
Psyber wrote:
I still remember what Jonathon Ross might have been if he'd ever been sober! Talent is useless if you don't have the head to use it.
by Hondo » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:56 pm
by NFC » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:59 pm
hondo71 wrote:If Darren is such a hot prospect how come the no-one traded with the Crows for him??
NFC - I thought he was going to be in the Power's starting 18 next year? Why isn't he training with them?
Lots of questions there
by NFC » Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:00 pm
heater31 wrote:Psyber wrote:
I still remember what Jonathon Ross might have been if he'd ever been sober! Talent is useless if you don't have the head to use it.
sadly I think Darren is in the mould of Jonathon. A bloke I know saw him out on the town the day he got delisted surely you would be too embarrassed to step outside of your house.
by heater31 » Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:07 pm
NFC wrote:heater31 wrote:Psyber wrote:
I still remember what Jonathon Ross might have been if he'd ever been sober! Talent is useless if you don't have the head to use it.
sadly I think Darren is in the mould of Jonathon. A bloke I know saw him out on the town the day he got delisted surely you would be too embarrassed to step outside of your house.
He would've known before that though...
by sydney-dog » Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:07 pm
by NFC » Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:11 pm
sydney-dog wrote:NFC
Mate, Pfeiffer, had his opportunities, he got sent back to Norwood because he was not training at AFL standards, he was presenting himself at training in an unfit manner, finally he found himself in couple of off-field incidents..
this kid has no one to blame but himself, 1000 lads would like the opportunity he had, potential or no potential he did not give it a crack, and his attitude let him down...
I hope the lad learns from the experience, however the club can not be blamed for losing patience
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |