Dissident wrote:I thought the rule was changed from being a 3rd round pick, to being the NEXT pick you have AFTER a club who bids (from that pick) - I don't think it was ever "they bid a first round so you have to as well"
This.
by Lance's brother » Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:47 pm
Dissident wrote:I thought the rule was changed from being a 3rd round pick, to being the NEXT pick you have AFTER a club who bids (from that pick) - I don't think it was ever "they bid a first round so you have to as well"
by Perfect Drug » Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:14 pm
Lance's brother wrote:Dissident wrote:I thought the rule was changed from being a 3rd round pick, to being the NEXT pick you have AFTER a club who bids (from that pick) - I don't think it was ever "they bid a first round so you have to as well"
This.
by Booney » Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:17 pm
Perfect Drug wrote:Lance's brother wrote:Dissident wrote:I thought the rule was changed from being a 3rd round pick, to being the NEXT pick you have AFTER a club who bids (from that pick) - I don't think it was ever "they bid a first round so you have to as well"
This.
Aye.
This was my understanding too Booney. Surely you don't think Melbourne should have to use their pick three, for the son of a former club great, if Sydney had nominated him for their first round pick (22 I think)??
by Rik E Boy » Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:31 pm
Booney wrote:Strawb wrote:Damien Barrett says Geelong are very close and confident in getting all three of Caddy, Rivers and McIntosh.
Well, well, well. Wont this test "He plays for Geelong so he's a superstar" theory, REB?
by Johno6 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:00 pm
by Squids » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:26 pm
by SDK » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:41 pm
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:02 pm
SDK wrote:The father son rule really goes back to cover former VFL stars so why does not it apply to SANFL and WAFL ?
The VFL is now the AFL with interstate sides but founded and run by Victorians. Victorians do not recognise other states as contributors to football and arrogantly devised a rule just for Victorians not South Australians and Western Australians.
The non Victorian Clubs should band together and seek change or not play until it is resolved. How would a court case go ?
by Pup » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:09 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Big deal about Pick 17's history. Wellingham is still shite as you'll find out soon enough. All that research and all you could have posted was 'I rate him'. but you didn't. And in twelve months time I'm tipping you wont either.
More worried about his hairstyle.
regards,
REB
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:32 pm
by daysofourlives » Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:24 pm
Jim05 wrote:SDK wrote:The father son rule really goes back to cover former VFL stars so why does not it apply to SANFL and WAFL ?
The VFL is now the AFL with interstate sides but founded and run by Victorians. Victorians do not recognise other states as contributors to football and arrogantly devised a rule just for Victorians not South Australians and Western Australians.
The non Victorian Clubs should band together and seek change or not play until it is resolved. How would a court case go ?
They knew the rules when they joined, they are more than welcome to leave
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:28 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:SDK wrote:The father son rule really goes back to cover former VFL stars so why does not it apply to SANFL and WAFL ?
The VFL is now the AFL with interstate sides but founded and run by Victorians. Victorians do not recognise other states as contributors to football and arrogantly devised a rule just for Victorians not South Australians and Western Australians.
The non Victorian Clubs should band together and seek change or not play until it is resolved. How would a court case go ?
They knew the rules when they joined, they are more than welcome to leave
That would fix Essendon's traveling record, heck they might even win a final
by daysofourlives » Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:37 pm
Jim05 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:SDK wrote:The father son rule really goes back to cover former VFL stars so why does not it apply to SANFL and WAFL ?
The VFL is now the AFL with interstate sides but founded and run by Victorians. Victorians do not recognise other states as contributors to football and arrogantly devised a rule just for Victorians not South Australians and Western Australians.
The non Victorian Clubs should band together and seek change or not play until it is resolved. How would a court case go ?
They knew the rules when they joined, they are more than welcome to leave
That would fix Essendon's traveling record, heck they might even win a final
we have to make them first
by the joker » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:32 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:35 pm
by heater31 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:58 pm
the joker wrote:Rumours floating that big announcement about bulldogs coming. 5aa said it could be fev will be drafted, or could be cooney may be forced to retire with his knee
by overloaded » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:06 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:What's Didak's situation at Collingwood? Has he signed?
Currently at Mawson Lakes Hotel. Probably home visiting family but any trip to Adelaide at this time of year is bound to prompt queries...
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:34 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Unless you happen to bottom out during expansion years!
by test » Wed Oct 10, 2012 9:14 pm
the joker wrote:Rumours floating that big announcement about bulldogs coming. 5aa said it could be fev will be drafted, or could be cooney may be forced to retire with his knee
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |