SA Footy

Coach Bombay wrote:Should just be called "comments" nothing special about them. So why do they have Harley, Carey and Richo as well. 4 comments staff for one game FFS

Bays09 would know.

Spargo wrote:

RustyCage wrote:

helicopterking wrote:Leigh Matthews spends all his time defending the umpiring, even when it's a blatant wrong decision, like the Suckling/Waite trip

Obvious trip, if the tackle didn't end up taking out his feet, the Hawk player was off and running down the ground as the "tackle" didn't do much more than ruffle his guernsey

Sorry, but the tackle was legal before slipping to the feet and was in the middle of the player taking a bounce. Unless the rule has changed over night then it was blatantly holding the ball.

If the tackle ends up around his feet, it's not a legal tackle

Spargo wrote:

Coach Bombay wrote:Should just be called "comments" nothing special about them. So why do they have Harley, Carey and Richo as well. 4 comments staff for one game FFS

Bays09 would know.

He got the sack; his posts were utter shite

RustyCage wrote:

Spargo wrote:

RustyCage wrote:

helicopterking wrote:Leigh Matthews spends all his time defending the umpiring, even when it's a blatant wrong decision, like the Suckling/Waite trip

Obvious trip, if the tackle didn't end up taking out his feet, the Hawk player was off and running down the ground as the "tackle" didn't do much more than ruffle his guernsey

Sorry, but the tackle was legal before slipping to the feet and was in the middle of the player taking a bounce. Unless the rule has changed over night then it was blatantly holding the ball.

If the tackle ends up around his feet, it's not a legal tackle

It was holding the ball before it was a trip.

I'm pretty sure that's about 6 kicked on Schoenmakers

helicopterking wrote:Leigh Matthews spends all his time defending the umpiring, even when it's a blatant wrong decision, like the Suckling/Waite trip

Just did it then with McLean's deliberate out of bounds which was never there IMO, he was battling for the ball with a Hawks player, tried to hit it to his advantage but it went out of bounds, nothing in it. Matthews blatantly defended the umpire saying he got that right. WTF was McLean ment to do there?

carey wrote:People can say what they like about him but gee Chris Judd can play.

He's been good tonight but f**k I hate the commentators love affair with him.

Game day reports are an absolute joke, why have them?

Cyril's report will be thrown out, but now Cyril hasnt gone near it, no doubt worrying about the report.

Just leave all reports until Monday FFS

I like the look of Menzel, huge talent!

Watson is a ******* Spud, should of kicked that goal. Carlton have a run on, skipper hits him on the chest and gives him an easy shot on goal. He butchers it, Hawthorn get it down the other end and Sewell kicks a goal to bring the margin back to two points.

Shouldn't be worrying about anything if he did nothing wrong.

daysofourlives wrote:Cyril's report will be thrown out, but now Cyril hasnt gone near it, no doubt worrying about the report.

Cyril doesn't go near it anyway.

Bruce is lost now that Cyril's impact has dropped. Menzel had a breakout match against adelaide and has been pretty consistent since. Solid month from him.

The Dark Knight wrote:I like the look of Menzel, huge talent!

Watson is a ******* Spud, should of kicked that goal. Carlton have a run on, skipper hits him on the chest and gives him an easy shot on goal. He butchers it, Hawthorn get it down the other end and Sewell kicks a goal to bring the margin back to two points.

Menzel reminds me so much of Wingard.

Sam Rowe having a pretty solid night

RustyCage wrote:

helicopterking wrote:Leigh Matthews spends all his time defending the umpiring, even when it's a blatant wrong decision, like the Suckling/Waite trip

Obvious trip, if the tackle didn't end up taking out his feet, the Hawk player was off and running down the ground as the "tackle" didn't do much more than ruffle his guernsey

know the rules at all RC?

carey wrote:

Q. wrote:Umpiring fraternity has lost the plot.

Amazes me how the rules change from week to week. Well in fact the interpretation of the rules anyway.

Completely agree. That was a disgrace tonight. I've been all for the way the game has been umpired tonight but the three umpires seem to run their own agenda to completely stuff up a game of footy.

They succeeded.

gadj1976 wrote:

RustyCage wrote:

helicopterking wrote:Leigh Matthews spends all his time defending the umpiring, even when it's a blatant wrong decision, like the Suckling/Waite trip

Obvious trip, if the tackle didn't end up taking out his feet, the Hawk player was off and running down the ground as the "tackle" didn't do much more than ruffle his guernsey

know the rules at all RC?[/quote]

Sure do. Watch the replay with two eyes next time

Rioli has 87.5 carry over points from the Grand Final, may count against him this week

RustyCage wrote:Rioli has 87.5 carry over points from the Grand Final, may count against him this week

Kidding aren't you?
Wont even make it to the tribunal, should be thrown out immediately

RustyCage wrote:

gadj1976 wrote:

RustyCage wrote:

helicopterking wrote:Leigh Matthews spends all his time defending the umpiring, even when it's a blatant wrong decision, like the Suckling/Waite trip

Obvious trip, if the tackle didn't end up taking out his feet, the Hawk player was off and running down the ground as the "tackle" didn't do much more than ruffle his guernsey

know the rules at all RC?

Sure do. Watch the replay with two eyes next time[/quote]

No, understand what constitutes a tackle and you'll be better off for the exercise.