SA Footy

bennymacca wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Out of curiosity, if Carlton sacked Malthouse and paid him out, would it matter where they got the money from to pay him out?

Given there is no cap on football department spending just yet, no

Wont ever be a cap and nor should there be.
May be a luxury tax but thats about it.

well they are talking about it

Will probably end up being a luxury tax but im dead against capping spending. Collingwood has shown that spending squillions doesnt guarantee success.
If a club chooses to waste its money on stuff that appears as overkill good luck to them

Like the bombers and their spending on their supplements program?

bennymacca wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Out of curiosity, if Carlton sacked Malthouse and paid him out, would it matter where they got the money from to pay him out?

Given there is no cap on football department spending just yet, no

Wont ever be a cap and nor should there be.
May be a luxury tax but thats about it.

well they are talking about it

because they don't want clubs sacking coaches.

Mr Beefy wrote:Like the bombers and their spending on their supplements program?

Yeah we must of got the wrong stuff, clearly the stuff doesnt work

Jim05 wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:Like the bombers and their spending on their supplements program?

Yeah we must of got the wrong stuff, clearly the stuff doesnt work

after about round 13 it seems to wear of

woodublieve12 wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:Like the bombers and their spending on their supplements program?

Yeah we must of got the wrong stuff, clearly the stuff doesnt work

after about round 13 it seems to wear of

What happened last year then lol

Jim05 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:Like the bombers and their spending on their supplements program?

Yeah we must of got the wrong stuff, clearly the stuff doesnt work

after about round 13 it seems to wear of

What happened last year then lol

should have finished top 4...

Sellers into MM on AFL 360, reckons its a disgrace how he is the face of the club and acting the way he does at press conferences. members and sponsors deserve better

Agree 100% with him ...

I love Sellers... tells it like it is and exactly what I'm thinking...

Sent from my XT925 using Tapatalk

So get ready for some big news on Monday gadj?

Ted E Bear wrote:So get ready for some big news on Monday gadj?

Monday? I can't wait that long.

Please, PLEASE, PLEASE get rid of the old codger!

I'm going to start a facebook campaign to raise some money to boot the old fart out of the club.

Where's Turbo? MIA?
Just because one part of your tag team is barred, shouldn't stop you from posting champ.

He wants a coaching extension. WTF ?

Ted E Bear wrote:He wants a coaching extension. WTF ?

How can we oust the old fart from the club?

Truck full of chicken livers on the doorstep perhaps?

I watched the presser from Mick. Bit more subdued this week. Supported the playing group, even to say they lacked confidence. BUT, no questions were asked about Waite, Garlett etc when we are unable to kick a winning score. IMO no better way to gain confidence than playing your best side against the bottom (or close to) side to gain some major confidence, when we desperately needed it.

Spargo wrote:Where's Turbo? MIA?
Just because one part of your tag team is barred, shouldn't stop you from posting champ.

Haha, unban Squids...pleeeeeeeeeease

Should Stix leave before the end of the year?

Q. wrote:

Spargo wrote:Where's Turbo? MIA?
Just because one part of your tag team is barred, shouldn't stop you from posting champ.

Haha, unban Squids...pleeeeeeeeeease

regards,

REB

Hehe. He's a bigger moron than squids, REB

Ted E Bear wrote:Should Stix leave before the end of the year?

well this is happening under his watch.