Footy Smart wrote:The tag 'pretenders' doesn’t sit well with me at all
Each game is a 2 horse race, 1 team wins 1 team looses (or a draw), often the team "tipped" to win, looses.
If this pretender tag is correct then why did the bottom 8 teams continue to play? are they pretenders? why compete at all if that is the case? didn’t St Kilda loose to North Melbourne

Didn’t Adelaide beat Collingwood in round1?
I’m not saying Adelaide are certainties or anything like that, but you have to be in it to win it so the top 8 teams are still 'contenders'
Anything can happen in AFL and that’s what makes the game great, so you can stick you 'pretenders' tag where you like
I can't stick it anywhere as you have totally missed the point of what I was trying to say. How can the bottom eight be pretenders? Who has been rating them? Why compete at all? Surely you jest??
There are contenders and then there are genuine contenders. If the media and some hopeful fans talk them up when they've won 4 out of 11 with no wins over any of the top three sides then I'm sorry pretenders is what you are no matter how much you get talked up by media pundits and fellow Blackbirds fans.
Of course you don't like the term 'pretenders' because that means I don't rate your side, but park the emotions and open yourself to logic. This is not 1998 - lose this week (which you won't) like you did to Melbourne in that first final 11 years ago then you are out on your arse. Since the introduction of the current final eight set up most top four sides hit back from a Qualifying Final loss to appear in the Preliminary Final. Then there is Neil Craig, a man with an impeccable minor round record with a diabolical major round record not just for the Crows but for my beloved Redlegs as well.
I reckon there will be four and twenty two Blackbirds baked by the Pies in the semi final next weekend.
regards,
REB