Page 18 of 19
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:20 pm
by Q.
What's the actual probability of a grand final actual going to 'golden point'?
Don't reckon I'll see it in my lifetime.
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:34 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
What a joke with no more replays...
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:46 pm
by stan
Q. wrote:What's the actual probability of a grand final actual going to 'golden point'?
Don't reckon I'll see it in my lifetime.
Been a pain the 3 times its happened in the last 70 years............
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:55 pm
by Q.
stan wrote:Q. wrote:What's the actual probability of a grand final actual going to 'golden point'?
Don't reckon I'll see it in my lifetime.
Been a pain the 3 times its happened in the last 70 years............
Yes, 3 in 70 years a draw at full time, but the probability of it again being a draw after extra time would be incredibly low
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:56 pm
by stan
Q. wrote:stan wrote:Q. wrote:What's the actual probability of a grand final actual going to 'golden point'?
Don't reckon I'll see it in my lifetime.
Been a pain the 3 times its happened in the last 70 years............
Yes, 3 in 70 years a draw at full time, but the probability of it again being a draw after extra time would be incredibly low
Yes I agree. Unless nobody could score because with the reduced cap the players were so completely ******.
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:12 pm
by bennymacca
That's a good point, do they get an extra quota of interchange rotations?
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:19 pm
by heater31
bennymacca wrote:That's a good point, do they get an extra quota of interchange rotations?
It's 5 minutes each end.....probably not!
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:21 pm
by bennymacca
Would suck for the guys that got benched with 1 minute left having to sit out the rest of the extra time!
Actually, thinking about it more, the interchanges at the quarter breaks are free and above the 90 as it is, so they will surely get to change at the breaks as they normally do.
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 12:24 am
by Jim05
bennymacca wrote:Would suck for the guys that got benched with 1 minute left having to sit out the rest of the extra time!
Actually, thinking about it more, the interchanges at the quarter breaks are free and above the 90 as it is, so they will surely get to change at the breaks as they normally do.
Except there is no break of play at the end of extra time, not even a siren. Once the 10 minutes is up its straight into golden point.
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 12:26 am
by Gozu
Never understood draws in footy. Both sides supporters leave deflated a drawn GF and making them all come back the next week is so antiquated to be laughable in this day and age. Always liked that with basketball, overtime.
Just play an extra 10 mins with two 5 minute halves.
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 8:25 am
by bennymacca
Jim05 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Would suck for the guys that got benched with 1 minute left having to sit out the rest of the extra time!
Actually, thinking about it more, the interchanges at the quarter breaks are free and above the 90 as it is, so they will surely get to change at the breaks as they normally do.
Except there is no break of play at the end of extra time, not even a siren. Once the 10 minutes is up its straight into golden point.
Was talking about at the end of the game and after 5 mins there is another break.
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:08 am
by JK
heater31 wrote:bennymacca wrote:That's a good point, do they get an extra quota of interchange rotations?
It's 5 minutes each end.....probably not!
15 rotations for the 10 mins of extra time apparently
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:08 am
by bennymacca
That makes sense
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:11 am
by JK
LaughingKookaburra wrote:JK wrote:DoublebluTiger wrote:Like others it should be first goal wins if scores still level after both extra periods and not a behind.
You could imagine the outcry though if one end was favoured by a 5 goal breeze.
I kinda get both arguments on it, but imho I'd keep it as is. As has been said the instances of drawn GF's show how uncommon it is
In the last 10 years has there ever been a game at the MCG where 1 end is truly favoured by wind, let alone one that is worth 5 goal?
It's a paddock surrounded entirely with massive grand stands and there is no space for the wind to get through. It sure does swirl, but I can't remember it truly favouring 1 end recently.
You might be right, but Im sure theres been instances of one end being the favoured scoring end, at all grounds in some matches. I guess my point is that if we're going to change the rules surely they should cover every (presently) conceivable aspect?
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:01 pm
by Dutchy
Apparently it is golden point instead of golden goal because if a team kicks 7 points before the opposition kicks a goal they will have a higher score but lose the GF. If a team kics 7 points in a row they don;t deserve the flag!!!
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:04 pm
by stan
Dutchy wrote:Apparently it is golden point instead of golden goal because if a team kicks 7 points before the opposition kicks a goal they will have a higher score but lose the GF. If a team kics 7 points in a row they don;t deserve the flag!!!
Yep. Bad kicking is bad football.
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:20 pm
by bennymacca
Dutchy wrote:Apparently it is golden point instead of golden goal because if a team kicks 7 points before the opposition kicks a goal they will have a higher score but lose the GF. If a team kics 7 points in a row they don;t deserve the flag!!!
That makes sense though. Would be a farce if they had a higher score but lost, no matter how many goes at winning they had
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:41 pm
by LaughingKookaburra
Seriously, how hard would it be to say first team to 6 points.... There fore you cover both sides of that argument.
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:42 pm
by The Bedge
Seriously, how many draws are we expecting?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: Round 4 discussion
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Posted:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:55 pm
by gossipgirl
Seriously who's going to draw against hawthorn