SA Footy

daysofourlives wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:How many weeks for Greene?

Fine at worst

Agreed, it was no different to Lachie Neale's last year.
But with Toby Tax he'll get 2

Agreed. Should be the same categories that were ticked off.

Armchair expert wrote:Just give the Dees the cup now

Yep, they win from here…. Feck off Port.

What, no motor bike…

Lions need to start running

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk

Just saw green v ump, gone for sure. How can he say that wasn't intentional, never gonna hurt the ump but a shocking look, seeya next year at rnd 3 i reckon.

Bandit wrote:Just saw green v ump, gone for sure. How can he say that wasn't intentional, never gonna hurt the ump but a shocking look, seeya next year at rnd 3 i reckon.

Totally agree

Bandit wrote:Just saw green v ump, gone for sure. How can he say that wasn't intentional, never gonna hurt the ump but a shocking look, seeya next year at rnd 3 i reckon.

Hope so but i reckon they will just fine him because of the finals aspect, poor if thats the case though

Any contact that is demonstrative or aggressive has to be deemed intentional, he's given the umpire a spray then chested him, he has to go.

Booney wrote:Any contact that is demonstrative or aggressive has to be deemed intentional, he's given the umpire a spray then chested him, he has to go.

Massive TG fan, but he's gotta be in strife, and either he somehow gets off or cops plenty, dont think there can be much middle ground.

Thats where footy is wrong these days, Andrews goes back with eyes solely for the ball and only makes contact in the marking contest and gives away a goal .. If thats more a "front on" free than what Rozee should have had last night, then somethings wrong

JK wrote:Thats where footy is wrong these days, Andrews goes back with eyes solely for the ball and only makes contact in the marking contest and gives away a goal .. If thats more a "front on" free than what Rozee should have had last night, then somethings wrong

Its razor ray what do you expect from that muppett

Harris Andrews has looked stoned all match

Enjoying seeing another club pay Joe a fortune to run around half arsed and shanking kicks

Cant see Melbourne losing it, most impressive team of the weekend, as long as their forward line fires they win it.
More midfield depth than Port, probably the better defence and they are on a par for forwards

daysofourlives wrote:Cant see Melbourne losing it, most impressive team of the weekend, as long as their forward line fires they win it.
More midfield depth than Port, probably the better defence and they are on a par for forwards

Have to agree with your there. Dees look he goods. Should be able to account for Port whoever else from here.

daysofourlives wrote:Cant see Melbourne losing it, most impressive team of the weekend, as long as their forward line fires they win it.
More midfield depth than Port, probably the better defence and they are on a par for forwards

I dunno, dont think they were put under enough pressure, still reserving judgement

JK wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Cant see Melbourne losing it, most impressive team of the weekend, as long as their forward line fires they win it.
More midfield depth than Port, probably the better defence and they are on a par for forwards

I dunno, dont think they were put under enough pressure, still reserving judgement

Yep I'm with you, i think unfortunately that Port have the side to match it with them, of course thats if they both get there

I don't think Ken will have any sleepless nights on what he saw tonight from Melbourne, they certainly showed cracks in the 3rd and for a while in the last when Brisbane put the pressure on and ran more, Port are a running team and have pretty mobile forwards who will trouble the likes of May and Lever

locky801 wrote:

JK wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Cant see Melbourne losing it, most impressive team of the weekend, as long as their forward line fires they win it.
More midfield depth than Port, probably the better defence and they are on a par for forwards

I dunno, dont think they were put under enough pressure, still reserving judgement

Yep I'm with you, i think unfortunately that Port have the side to match it with them, of course thats if they both get there

I don't think Ken will have any sleepless nights on what he saw tonight from Melbourne, they certainly showed cracks in the 3rd and for a while in the last when Brisbane put the pressure on and ran more, Port are a running team and have pretty mobile forwards who will trouble the likes of May and Lever

Lol Dixon is neither mobile nor will he trouble anyone, he is tall though.
But yes apart from him i dont think Goodwin is losing sleep over Marshall or Ladhams.
Which leaves us with the smalls, we know Motlop will go missing so they just have to keep in check Gray and Rozzee. Is Fantasia out? Melbournes backline is outstanding and more than enough to handle the majority of these plodders

daysofourlives wrote:Cant see Melbourne losing it, most impressive team of the weekend, as long as their forward line fires they win it.
More midfield depth than Port, probably the better defence and they are on a par for forwards

They have to get past us in the Prelim yet.

Bum Crack wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Cant see Melbourne losing it, most impressive team of the weekend, as long as their forward line fires they win it.
More midfield depth than Port, probably the better defence and they are on a par for forwards

They have to get past us in the Prelim yet.

Spot on.
They aren't getting past us...again

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk