Re: 2017 AFL Season
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:06 am
MW wrote:or hide him for hours so he can sober up and not get a DUI charge. good culture at Port
Again, you seen to know his blood alcohol level. Clever guy.
MW wrote:or hide him for hours so he can sober up and not get a DUI charge. good culture at Port
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:MW wrote:or hide him for hours so he can sober up and not get a DUI charge. good culture at Port
Lachie Whitfield anyone?
GWS got sanctioned, will Port?
Are you serious?
Whitfield hid from ASADA, who the AFL are aligned with for testing purposes. I'm pretty sure SAPOL will handle the criminal matter and it has **** all to do with the AFL. Coupled with the fact all clubs must lodge the fine they are imposing with the AFL and AFLPA it's pretty much got nothing to do with the AFL from here on.
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:Didn't Krackour get five games just for drinking and get into a punch-up?
Surely a hit and run isn't 1/5th as bad?
Was allowed some personal leave to head home to see family in WA while going through rehab from surgery. It was 3am, outside a known hot spot.
Booney wrote:MW wrote:or hide him for hours so he can sober up and not get a DUI charge. good culture at Port
Again, you seen to know his blood alcohol level. Clever guy.
marbles wrote:what would you do? when youre parro (drunk) after doing that? stand there and call the police on yourself?
marbles wrote:what would you do? when youre parro (drunk) after doing that? stand there and call the police on yourself?
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:MW wrote:or hide him for hours so he can sober up and not get a DUI charge. good culture at Port
Lachie Whitfield anyone?
GWS got sanctioned, will Port?
Are you serious?
Whitfield hid from ASADA, who the AFL are aligned with for testing purposes. I'm pretty sure SAPOL will handle the criminal matter and it has **** all to do with the AFL. Coupled with the fact all clubs must lodge the fine they are imposing with the AFL and AFLPA it's pretty much got nothing to do with the AFL from here on.
And Port hid Impey from the Police after an accident.
Which is worse?
C'mon lets get real with this.
Booney wrote:
In reality it actually has nothing to do with the PAFC. If I did it my employer would have no involvement. So what does it have to do with the AFL?
amber_fluid wrote:The club has committed a crime by assisting him in not going to the police straight away after an accident.
I'm sure big brother(AFL) can impose any sanction they want if they deem it necessary.
amber_fluid wrote:You don't think the AFL can ask Port for a please explain on their handling of the events?
I'm sure they will.
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:You don't think the AFL can ask Port for a please explain on their handling of the events?
I'm sure they will.
You don't think they already have?
Booney wrote:MW wrote:or hide him for hours so he can sober up and not get a DUI charge. good culture at Port
Again, you seen to know his blood alcohol level. Clever guy.
am Bays wrote:Isn't it punishment enough for Impey that he's playing for Port in the first place???
am Bays wrote:Isn't it punishment enough for Impey that he's playing for Port in the first place???
Dogwatcher wrote:Booney wrote:MW wrote:or hide him for hours so he can sober up and not get a DUI charge. good culture at Port
Again, you seen to know his blood alcohol level. Clever guy.
Then why not take him straight to the police, or go straight to the police, like he should have?
If this was a regular Joe Blow, we'd all be condemning the bloke for doing a runner and saying what a disgraceful human he is, just as many are with Impey - he just has advisors who can help guide him through the situation and they just made some bad decisions.