Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 6:51 amtigerpie wrote:What's Hawkins going to get for looking at his phone or a phone?
Is it that big a deal?
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 7:43 amWedgie wrote:tigerpie wrote:What's Hawkins going to get for looking at his phone or a phone?
Is it that big a deal?
No, players have to have their phones locked up during games and his was.
Players look at authorised devices during a game all the time.
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 9:14 amlocky801 wrote:Wedgie wrote:tigerpie wrote:What's Hawkins going to get for looking at his phone or a phone?
Is it that big a deal?
No, players have to have their phones locked up during games and his was.
Players look at authorised devices during a game all the time.
evidently it was an authorised device, once again the media makin g a fuss over it
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 9:17 amPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 9:22 amPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 9:31 amPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 9:36 amPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 12:18 pmArmchair expert wrote:Standard Geelong get away with murder
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 12:23 pmArmchair expert wrote:Standard Geelong get away with murder
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 12:25 pmBooney wrote:I heard he was looking at a John Butcher highlight package.
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:46 pmPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 7:26 pmMr Beefy wrote:locky801 wrote:Wedgie wrote:tigerpie wrote:What's Hawkins going to get for looking at his phone or a phone?
Is it that big a deal?
No, players have to have their phones locked up during games and his was.
Players look at authorised devices during a game all the time.
evidently it was an authorised device, once again the media makin g a fuss over it
He was apparently looking at the rain radar
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:41 amPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:42 amwhufc wrote:Yep apparently was 100% to do with his farming which is why he has permission.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:44 amPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:46 amBrodlach wrote:Wasn’t his phone and was in his possession for about 4 seconds. Looked at the screen then gave it back.
No big deal IMO
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:48 am
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:49 amBrodlach wrote:Wasn’t his phone and was in his possession for about 4 seconds. Looked at the screen then gave it back.
No big deal IMO
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:50 amMW wrote:Brodlach wrote:Wasn’t his phone and was in his possession for about 4 seconds. Looked at the screen then gave it back.
No big deal IMO
Same thing cost Collingwood $20k
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:51 amBrodlach wrote:MW wrote:Brodlach wrote:Wasn’t his phone and was in his possession for about 4 seconds. Looked at the screen then gave it back.
No big deal IMO
Same thing cost Collingwood $20k
I know of that one but not the actual facts.
Had they not come off for lightning it wouldn’t have occurred.
