SA Footy

So much discussion, so little predictions...

Adelaide
Geelong
Sydney
Richmond
Hawthorn
Port
Bulldogs
GWS

Melbourne
Essendon
West Coast
St Kilda
Collingwood
Brisbane
Fremantle
Gold Coast
Carlton
North

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

My predictor had me as the following:

Adelaide 72
GWS 68
Richmond 68
Geelong 64
Sydney 60
Melbourne 60
Port 56
Bulldogs 52
West Coast 48
Essendon 44
Hawthorn 40
Collingwood 40
St. Kilda 36
Fremantle 32
Brisbane 16
Carlton 16
Gold Coast 12
North Melb 8


I'll do another one next week. see how much it changes LOL.

The predictor I found was pretty rank so I should wait for the AFL one to be available unless anyone else knows where to find one?

Booney wrote:

morell wrote:You always know someone has NFI when you hear
"Just kick it!!!"
Or
"Bloody sideways chippy rubbish"

In reality you have NFI either.

In reality neither do you. Neither does anyone.

If anyone did, there would be no point in playing the game.

morell wrote:

Booney wrote:

morell wrote:You always know someone has NFI when you hear
"Just kick it!!!"
Or
"Bloody sideways chippy rubbish"

In reality you have NFI either.

In reality neither do you. Neither does anyone.

If anyone did, there would be no point in playing the game.

No, I'm referring to how the game is played, what goes on behind the scenes with analytics, structures, team rules etc.

We all know why we play the game, it's the greatest game in the world, but to mock someone else by saying they have "NFI" about the above mentioned when I/you/we don't either comes across as a bit.....*multisyllabic word here*.

Dude you went to a conference, that's nice, but it doesn't make the people presenting that material that you're sucking off 100% correct 100% of the time, either.

Those on the stage are in charge of a club that finished 8th last year and has failed time and time again for seasons on end.

This is why I like data. It doesn't lie.

Can't we all just be friends?! I don't like when mummy fights with daddy!

morell wrote:Dude you went to a conference, that's nice, but it doesn't make the people presenting that material that you're sucking off 100% correct 100% of the time, either.

Those on the stage are in charge of a club that finished 8th last year and has failed time and time again for seasons on end.

This is why I like data. It doesn't lie.

I agree data does not lie, nor does it tell the full story.

morell wrote:Dude you went to a conference, that's nice, but it doesn't make the people presenting that material that you're sucking off 100% correct 100% of the time, either.

Those on the stage are in charge of a club that finished 8th last year and has failed time and time again for seasons on end.

This is why I like data. It doesn't lie.

Not referring to that at all, a few hours of listening to some presentations hasn't given me anything but a small insight into what goes on, a very small insight.

But you standing there mocking someone's understanding because they're frustrated at "chippy chippy sideways" is so unbelievably high and mighty it's almost as frustrating as the "chippy chippy sideways" stuff itself, but you've got data to back it up so hey, you must be right.

Also, don't ever refer to me as "dude", ever, and as for "sucking someone off" I'd suggest that's probably not something I'd do, nor would I think it's something you can say I would.

morell wrote:Dude you went to a conference, that's nice, but it doesn't make the people presenting that material that you're sucking off 100% correct 100% of the time, either.

Those on the stage are in charge of a club that finished 8th last year and has failed time and time again for seasons on end.

This is why I like data. It doesn't lie.

I think you're missing the point to what Booney is trying to tell you

Nah I'm sick of nice. Fire up ****!!

Booney wrote:

morell wrote:Dude you went to a conference, that's nice, but it doesn't make the people presenting that material that you're sucking off 100% correct 100% of the time, either.

Those on the stage are in charge of a club that finished 8th last year and has failed time and time again for seasons on end.

This is why I like data. It doesn't lie.

Not referring to that at all, a few hours of listening to some presentations hasn't given me anything but a small insight into what goes on, a very small insight.

But you standing there mocking someone's understanding because they're frustrated at "chippy chippy sideways" is so unbelievably high and mighty it's almost as frustrating as the "chippy chippy sideways" stuff itself, but you've got data to back it up so hey, you must be right.

Also, don't ever refer to me as "dude", ever, and as for "sucking someone off" I'd suggest that's probably not something I'd do, nor would I think it's something you can say I would.

This is pure unadulterated claptrap. Utter garbage, in fact.

There are degrees of knowledge, different levels of understanding. You're reducing that into a simplistic binary world which doesn't exist, and nor should it.

Honestly, I cannot stand that style of thinking. It's tantamount to never questioning anything and is inherently unhealthy. And very not Port Adelaide, might I add.

morell wrote:it doesn't make the people presenting that material that you're sucking off 100% correct 100% of the time, either.

This comment irks me. You regularly present yourself as an Elitist and are quite condescending on here, seldom wrong and when challenged enjoy beating down people with your facts or then taking cheap swipes at their level of intelligence with a constant display of degradation, yet you have the audacity to then highlight that a person - likely a specialist in their field, with data and research to support THEIR beliefs - who is presenting material in THEIR specialist field, as unlikely to be correct 100% correct, 100% of the time.

Everyone knows that no one can be correct 100% of the time, and no one knows everything... everyone except you it seems.

The Bedge wrote:

morell wrote:it doesn't make the people presenting that material that you're sucking off 100% correct 100% of the time, either.

This comment irks me. You regularly present yourself as an Elitist and are quite condescending on here, seldom wrong and when challenged enjoy beating down people with your facts or then taking cheap swipes at their level of intelligence with a constant display of degradation, yet you have the audacity to then highlight that a person - likely a specialist in their field, with data and research to support THEIR beliefs - who is presenting material in THEIR specialist field, as unlikely to be correct 100% correct, 100% of the time.

Everyone knows that no one can be correct 100% of the time, and no one knows everything... everyone except you it seems.

I enjoy keynote speakers, forums, conferences, presentations etc - not because I necessarily take everything as gospel, but I enjoy the insight it gives me into a world that i'm interested in that I probably would never be involved in. If I pick up learnings or ideals that I could use in other facets of sport or life then it's a bonus.

Take them for what they are.

The Bedge wrote:

morell wrote:it doesn't make the people presenting that material that you're sucking off 100% correct 100% of the time, either.

This comment irks me. You regularly present yourself as an Elitist and are quite condescending on here, seldom wrong and when challenged enjoy beating down people with your facts or then taking cheap swipes at their level of intelligence with a constant display of degradation, yet you have the audacity to then highlight that a person - likely a specialist in their field, with data and research to support THEIR beliefs - who is presenting material in THEIR specialist field, as unlikely to be correct 100% correct, 100% of the time.

Everyone knows that no one can be correct 100% of the time, and no one knows everything... everyone except you it seems.

Nah get ******.

If someone doesn't understand that moving the ball to the other side of the ground to find space can be advantageous then they don't understand the game. Which is fine, I don't care if someone doesn't understand that, why would I.

But Booney was inferring that my knowing that fact, somehow puts me in the position that I'm elitist or above people.

It's bullshit anti-intellectual rubbish and I'm not putting up with it.

Boon v Morell in court.

We've secured some actual footage of Boon graciously accepting the victory over the high and mighty Morell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAULvXryp3E

Morell, Booney's argument is you should not label all pundits who yell "just kick it long" as incorrect or having NFI. That was it.
Not sure why it's come to this!

mots02 wrote:Boon v Morell in court.

We've secured some actual footage of Boon graciously accepting the victory over the high and mighty Morell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAULvXryp3E

Learn to embed the clip nuffy

mots02 wrote:Boon v Morell in court.

We've secured some actual footage of Boon graciously accepting the victory over the high and mighty Morell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAULvXryp3E

Didn't even need to open the clip and had a fair idea what it was gonna be haha!! Great movie